FIGURE 6c
FROM:
Large-scale mapping of human protein–protein interactions by mass spectrometry
Rob M Ewing, Peter Chu, Fred Elisma, Hongyan Li, Paul Taylor, Shane Climie, Linda McBroom-Cerajewski, Mark D Robinson, Liam O'Connor, Michael Li, Rod Taylor, Moyez Dharsee, Yuen Ho, Adrian Heilbut, Lynda Moore, Shudong Zhang, Olga Ornatsky, Yury V Bukhman, Martin Ethier, Yinglun Sheng, Julian Vasilescu, Mohamed Abu-Farha, Jean-Philippe Lambert, Henry S Duewel, Ian I Stewart, Bonnie Kuehl, Kelly Hogue, Karen Colwill, Katharine Gladwish, Brenda Muskat, Robert Kinach, Sally-Lin Adams, Michael F Moran, Gregg B Morin, Thodoros Topaloglou & Daniel Figeys
doi:10.1038/msb4100134
BACK TO ARTICLE
(C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing both baits and preys) for selected groups of baits. Nodes are colored according to cellular component or biological process as indicated on each figure. Baits are shown as large, labeled oval shapes, preys as small, labeled oval shapes. Arrow direction indicates a bait–prey relationship and line thickness indicates the interaction confidence score (see legend in panel C). Preys are grouped according to the baits with which they were identified (except panel E where they are grouped according to interaction confidence score). (C) Proteasome baits (corresponds to bait–bait cluster B (panel iv)). (D) Sumoylation pathway (corresponds to bait-bait cluster B (panel vi)). (E) Nek6. (F) Translation initiation and elongation (corresponds to bait–bait cluster B (panel iii)).
