Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:

Nature and nurture in novelty seeking

Abstract

A sample of children (n=92), derived from a representative population sample of healthy young Finns (n=2149), was studied from childhood to adulthood over 14 years to determine whether the childhood environment moderated the effect of dopamine receptor gene (DRD4) polymorphism on novelty seeking (NS). A significant interaction between the DRD4 alleles and environmental variables was observed. When the childhood-rearing environment was more hostile (emotionally distant, low tolerance of the child's normal activity, and strict discipline), the participants carrying any two- or five-repeat alleles of the DRD4 gene had a significantly greater risk of exhibiting NS scores that were above the 10th percentile on a population distribution of 2149 adult Finnish women and men. The genotype had no effects on NS when the childhood environment was more favorable. Although the results are preliminary, pending replication, they nevertheless provide important information on the long-term effects of nurture and nature on NS temperament.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Plomin R, Owen MJ, McGuffin P . The genetic basis of complex human behaviors. Science 1994; 264: 1733–1739.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Benjamin J, Ebstein RP, Belmaker RH (eds) Molecular Genetics and the Human Personality. American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.: Washington, DC, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caspi A, McClay J, Moffitt TE, Mill J, Martin J, Craig IW et al. Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science 2002; 297: 851–854.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR . A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50: 975–990.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cloninger CR . A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: a proposal. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987; 44: 573–588.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Benjamin J, Li L, Patterson C, Greenberg BD, Murphy DL, Hamer DH . Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of novelty seeking. Nat Genet 1996; 12: 81–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ebstein RP, Novick O, Umansky R, Priel B, Osher Y, Blaine D et al. Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of novelty seeking. Nat Genet 1996; 12: 78–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebstein RP, Nemanov L, Klotz I, Gritsenko I, Belmaker RH . Additional evidence for an association between the dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III repeat polymorphism and the human personality trait of Novelty Seeking. Mol Psychiatry 1997; 2: 472–477.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Noble EP, Ozkaragoz TZ, Ritchie TL, Zhang X, Belin TR, Sparkes RS . D2 and D4 dopamine receptor polymorphisms and personality. Am J Med Genet 1998; 81: 257–267.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Strobel A, Wehr A, Michel A, Brocke B . Association between the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) exon III polymorphism and measures of novelty seeking in a German population. Mol Psychiatry 1999; 4: 378–384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tomitaka M, Tomitaka S, Otuka Y, Kim K, Matuki H, Sakamoto K et al. Association between novelty seeking and dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) exon III polymorphism in Japanese subjects. Am J Med Genet 1999; 88: 469–471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Benjamin J, Osher Y, Kotler M, Gritsenko I, Nemanov L, Belmaker RH et al. Association between tridimensional personality questionnaire (TPQ) traits and three functional polymorphisms: dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4), serotonin transporter promoter region (5-HTTLPR) and catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT). Mol Psychiatry 2000; 5: 96–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Malhotra AK, Virkkunen M, Rooney W, Eggert M, Linnoila M, Goldman D . The association between the dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) 16 amino acid repeat polymorphism and novelty seeking. Mol Psychiatry 1996; 1: 388–391.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gelernter J, Kranzler H, Coccaro E, Siever L, New A, Mulgrew CL . D4 dopamine-receptor (DRD4) alleles and novelty seeking in substance-dependent, personality-disorder, and control subjects. Am J Hum Genet 1997; 61: 1144–1152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ono Y, Manki H, Yoshimura K, Muramatsu T, Mizushima H, Higuchi S et al. Association between dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism and novelty seeking in Japanese subjects. Am J Med Genet 1997; 74: 501–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Herbst J, Zonderman A, McCrae R, Costa P . Do the dimensions of the temperament and character inventory map a simple genetic architecture? Evidence from molecular genetics and factor analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157: 1285–1291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ekelund J, Lichtermann D, Järvelin M-R, Peltonen L . Association between novelty seeking and the type 4 dopamine receptor gene in a large Finnish cohort sample. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 1453–1455.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Keltikangas-Järvinen L, Elovainio M, Kivimäki M, Ekelund J, Lichtermann D, Peltonen L . Association between the type 4 dopamine receptor gene polymorphism and novelty seeking. Psychosom Med 2003; 65: 471–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kluger AN, Siegfried Z, Ebstein RP . A meta-analysis of the association between DRD4 polymorphism and novelty seeking. Mol Psychiatry 2002; 7: 712–717.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rothbart MK, Ahadi SA, Evans DE . Temperament and personality: origins and outcomes. J Pers Soc Psychol 2000; 78: 122–135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Åkerblom HK, Uhari M, Pesonen E, Dahl M, Kaprio EA, Nuutinen EM et al. Cardiovascular risk in young Finns. Ann Med 1991; 23: 35–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lichter JB, Barr CL, Kennedy JL, Van Tol HH, Kidd KK, Livak KJ . A hypervariable segment in the human dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene. Hum Mol Genet 1993; 2: 767–773.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Makkonen T, Ruoppila I, Rönkä T ‘Operation family ’. Child Report 34. Mannerheim League of Child Welfare: Helsinki, Finland, 1981.

  24. Schaefer ES . A circumplex model for maternal behavior. J Abnormal Soc Psychol 1959; 59: 226–335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Räikkönen K, Keltikangas-Järvinen L . Childhood hyperactivity and the mother–child relationship as predictors of risk Type A behaviour in adolescence: a six year follow-up. Personality Indiv Differences 1992; 13: 321–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hesselbrock MN, Hesselbrock VM . Relationship of family history, antisocial personality disorder and personality traits in young men at risk for alcoholism. J Stud Alcohol 1992; 53: 619–625.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zaninelli RM, Porjesz B, Begleiter H . The tridimensional personality questionnaire in males at high and low risk for alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1992; 16: 68–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bulik CM, Sullivan PF, Weltzin TE, Kaye WH . Temperament in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 1995; 17: 251–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Krebs H, Weyers P, Janke W . Validation of the German version of Cloninger's TPQ: replication and correlations with stress coping, mood measures and drug use. Personality Indiv Difference 1998; 24: 805–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wills TA, Sandy JM, Yaeger A . Temperament and adolescent substance use: an epigenetic approach to risk and protection. J Personality 2000; 68: 1127–1151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chess S, Thomas A . Temperament in Clinical Practice. The Guilford Press: New York, 198; 205–206.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Scarr S, McCartney K . How people make their own environments: a theory of genotype greater then environment effects. Child Dev 1983; 54: 424–435.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Keltikangas-Järvinen L . Psychology and the risk for cardiovascular disorder: a developmental perspective. In: Bäckman L, von Hofsten C (eds). Psychology At the Turn of the Millenium, Vol. 1 Psychology Press: Hove, 2002; 335–353.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bates JE . Temperament in Infancy. In: Osofsky JD (ed). Handbook of Infant Development. Wiley: New York, 198; 1011–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Harris JR . The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do. Free Press: New York, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  36. McCrae RR, Costa Jr PT, Ostendorf F, Angleitner A, Hrebickova M, Avia MD et al. Nature over nurture: temperament, personality, and life span development. J Pers Soc Psychol 2000; 78: 173–186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L Keltikangas-Järvinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keltikangas-Järvinen, L., Räikkönen, K., Ekelund, J. et al. Nature and nurture in novelty seeking. Mol Psychiatry 9, 308–311 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001433

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001433

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links