Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Genome-wide association studies establish that human intelligence is highly heritable and polygenic

Abstract

General intelligence is an important human quantitative trait that accounts for much of the variation in diverse cognitive abilities. Individual differences in intelligence are strongly associated with many important life outcomes, including educational and occupational attainments, income, health and lifespan. Data from twin and family studies are consistent with a high heritability of intelligence, but this inference has been controversial. We conducted a genome-wide analysis of 3511 unrelated adults with data on 549 692 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and detailed phenotypes on cognitive traits. We estimate that 40% of the variation in crystallized-type intelligence and 51% of the variation in fluid-type intelligence between individuals is accounted for by linkage disequilibrium between genotyped common SNP markers and unknown causal variants. These estimates provide lower bounds for the narrow-sense heritability of the traits. We partitioned genetic variation on individual chromosomes and found that, on average, longer chromosomes explain more variation. Finally, using just SNP data we predicted 1% of the variance of crystallized and fluid cognitive phenotypes in an independent sample (P=0.009 and 0.028, respectively). Our results unequivocally confirm that a substantial proportion of individual differences in human intelligence is due to genetic variation, and are consistent with many genes of small effects underlying the additive genetic influences on intelligence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carroll JB . Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor Analytic Studies. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson W, te Nijenhuis J, Bouchard TJ . Still just one g: consistent results from five test batteries. Intelligence 2008; 32: 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deary IJ, Johnson W, Houlihan LM . Genetic foundations of human intelligence. Human Genet 2009; 126: 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gottfredson L . Why g matters: the complexity of everyday life. Intelligence 1997; 24: 79–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Batty GD, Deary IJ, Gottfredson LS . Premorbid (early life) IQ and later mortality risk: systematic review. Ann Epidemiol 2007; 17: 278–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deary IJ, Penke L, Johnson W . The neuroscience of human intelligence differences. Nat Rev Neurosci 2010; 11: 201–211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jung RE, Haier RJ . The parieto-frontal integration theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: converging neuroimaging evidence. Behav Brain Sci 2007; 30: 135–154; discussion 154–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Neubauer AC, Fink A . Intelligence and neural efficiency. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2009; 33: 1004–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Salthouse TA . Localizing age-related individual differences in a hierarchical structure. Intelligence 2004; 32: 541–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Craik FIM, Bialystok E . Cognition through the lifespan: mechanisms of change. Trends Cogn Sci 2006; 10: 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Visscher PM, Hill WG, Wray NR . Heritability in the genomics era: concepts and misconceptions. Nat Rev Genet 2008; 9: 255–266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacquard A . Heritability: one word, three concepts. Biometrics 1983; 39: 465–477.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kempthorne O . Logical, epistemological and statistical aspects of nature-nurture data interpretation. Biometrics 1978; 34: 1–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Deary IJ, Whalley LJ, Starr JM . A Lifetime of Intelligence: Follow-up Studies of the Scottish Mental Surveys of 1932 and 1947. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Deary IJ, Whiteman MC, Starr JM, Whalley LJ, Fox HC . The impact of childhood intelligence on later life: following up the Scottish Mental Surveys of 1932 and 1947. J Pers Soc Psychol 2004; 86: 130–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Deary IJ, Gow AJ, Taylor MD, Corley J, Brett C, Wilson V et al. The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936: a study to examine influences on cognitive ageing from age 11 to age 70 and beyond. BMC Geriatrics 2007; 7: 28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rabbitt PMA, McInnes L, Diggle P, Holland F, Bent N, Abson V et al. The University of Manchester longitudinal study of cognition in normal healthy old age, 1983 through 2003. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 2004; 11: 245–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scottish Council for Research in Education. The Intelligence of Scottish Children: A National Survey of an Age-group. University of London Press: London, UK, 1933.

  19. Raven JC, Court JH, Raven J . Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. HK Lewis: London, UK, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW . Neuropsychological Assessment, 4th edn. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wechsler D . Wechsler Memory Scale–Revised. Psychological Corporation: San Antonio, TX, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nelson HE, Willison JR . National Adult Reading Test (NART) Test Manual, 2nd edn. NFER-Nelson: Windsor, UK, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Scottish Council for Research in Education. The Trend of Scottish Intelligence. University of London Press: London, UK, 1949.

  24. Wechsler D . WAIS-III UK Administration and Scoring Manual. Psychological Corporation: London, UK, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wechsler D . Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. Psychological Corporation: New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 2007; 81: 559–575.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu JZ, McRae AF, Nyholt DR, Medland SE, Wray NR, Brown KM et al. A versatile gene-based test for genome-wide association studies. Am J Hum Genet 2010; 87: 139–145.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, Gordon S, Henders AK, Nyholt DR et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat Genet 2010; 42: 565–569.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Visscher PM, Yang J, Goddard ME . A commentary on “Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height” by Yang et al. (2010). Twin Res Hum Genet 2010; 13: 517–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, Goddard ME . Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet Res 2009; 91: 47–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM . GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am J Hum Genet 2010; 88: 76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wray NR, Goddard ME, Visscher PM . Prediction of individual genetic risk to disease from genome-wide association studies. Genome Res 2007; 17: 1520–1528.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. The International Schizophrenia Consortium. Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Nature 2009; 460: 748–752.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wisdom NM, Callahan JL, Hawkins KA . The effects of apolipoprotein E on non-impaired cognitive functioning: a meta-analysis. Neurobiol Aging 2011; 32: 63–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Deary IJ, Whiteman MC, Pattie A, Starr JM, Hayward C, Wright AF et al. Cognitive change and the APOE e4 allele. Nature 2002; 418: 932.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee T, Henry JD, Trollor JN, Sachdev PS . Genetic influences on cognitive functions in the elderly: a selective review of twin studies. Brain Res Rev 2010; 64: 1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ho HY, Rohatgi R, Lebensohn AM, Le Ma, Li J, Gygi SP et al. Toca-1 mediates CDC42-dependent actin nucleation by activating the N-WASP-WIP complex. Cell 2004; 118: 203–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Goddard ME, Wray NR, Verbyla K, Visscher PM . Estimating effects and making predictions from genome-wide marker data. Statist Sci 2009; 24: 517–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Heath SC, Gut IG, Brennan P, McKay JD, Bencko V, Fabianova E et al. Investigation of the fine structure of European populations with applications to disease association studies. Eur J Hum Genet 2008; 16: 1413–1429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ et al. Finding the missing heritability in complex diseases. Nature 2009; 461: 747–753.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang J, Weedon MN, Purcell S, Lettre G, Estrada K, Willer CJ et al. Genomic inflation factors under polygenic inheritance. Eur J Hum Genet 2011; 19: 807–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Visscher PM . Whole genome approaches to quantitative genetics. Genetica 2009; 136: 351–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the cohort participants who contributed to these studies. Genotyping of the CAGES cohorts and the analyses conducted here were supported by the UK's Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC). Phenotype collection in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921 was supported by the BBSRC, The Royal Society and The Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government. Phenotype collection in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 was supported by Research Into Ageing (continues as part of Age UK's The Disconnected Mind project). Phenotype collection in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort 1936 was supported by BBSRC, the Welcome Trust and the Alzheimer's Research trust. Phenotype collection in the Manchester and Newcastle Longitudinal Studies of Cognitive Aging cohorts was supported by Social Science Research Council, Medical Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Research Into Ageing, Wellcome Trust and Unilever plc. Phenotype collection and genotyping in the Norwegian Cognitive Neuro-Genetics sample was supported by the Research Council of Norway (the FUGE program), the University of Bergen and the Bergen Research Foundation (Bergens Forskingsstiftelse, BFS). The Australian-based researchers acknowledge support from the Australian Research Council and the National Health and Medical Research Council. ML is a Royal Society of Edinburgh/Lloyds TSB Foundation for Scotland Personal Research Fellow. The work was undertaken in the University of Edinburgh Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, part of the cross council Lifelong Health and Wellbeing Initiative (G0700704/84698). Funding from the BBSRC, EPSRC, ESRC and MRC is gratefully acknowledged. This work was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, The Royal Society, The Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government, Research Into Ageing, Age UK, the Wellcome Trust, the Alzheimer's Research trust, Social Science Research Council, Medical Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Unilever plc, Research Council of Norway, the University of Bergen, Bergen Research Foundation, Australian Research Council, the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, Royal Society of Edinburgh/Lloyds TSB Foundation and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to P M Visscher or I J Deary.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Molecular Psychiatry website

Supplementary information

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, G., Tenesa, A., Payton, A. et al. Genome-wide association studies establish that human intelligence is highly heritable and polygenic. Mol Psychiatry 16, 996–1005 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2011.85

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2011.85

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links