Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The heritability of general cognitive ability increases linearly from childhood to young adulthood

Abstract

Although common sense suggests that environmental influences increasingly account for individual differences in behavior as experiences accumulate during the course of life, this hypothesis has not previously been tested, in part because of the large sample sizes needed for an adequately powered analysis. Here we show for general cognitive ability that, to the contrary, genetic influence increases with age. The heritability of general cognitive ability increases significantly and linearly from 41% in childhood (9 years) to 55% in adolescence (12 years) and to 66% in young adulthood (17 years) in a sample of 11 000 pairs of twins from four countries, a larger sample than all previous studies combined. In addition to its far-reaching implications for neuroscience and molecular genetics, this finding suggests new ways of thinking about the interface between nature and nurture during the school years. Why, despite life's ‘slings and arrows of outrageous fortune’, do genetically driven differences increasingly account for differences in general cognitive ability? We suggest that the answer lies with genotype–environment correlation: as children grow up, they increasingly select, modify and even create their own experiences in part based on their genetic propensities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spearman C . ‘General intelligence,’ objectively determined and measured. Am J Psychol 1904; 15: 201–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carroll JB . Human Cognitive Abilities. Cambridge University Press: New York, 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Jensen AR . The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability. Praeger: Westport, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Neisser U, Boodoo G, Bouchard Jr TJ, Boykin AW, Brody N, Ceci SJ et al. Intelligence: knowns and unknowns. Am Psychol 1996; 51: 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deary IJ, Whiteman MC, Starr JM, Whalley LJ, Fox HC . The impact of childhood intelligence on later life: following up the Scottish mental surveys of 1932 and 1947. J Pers Soc Psychol 2004; 86: 130–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gottfredson LS . Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence 1997; 24: 79–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmidt FL, Hunter J . General mental ability in the world of work: occupational attainment and job performance. J Pers Soc Psychol 2004; 86: 162–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bouchard Jr TJ, McGue M . Familial studies of intelligence: a review. Science 1981; 212: 1055–1059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Deary IJ, Spinath FM, Bates TC . Genetics of intelligence. Eur J Hum Genet 2006; 14: 690–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Plomin R, Spinath FM . Intelligence: genetics, genes, and genomics. J Pers Soc Psychol 2004; 86: 112–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Plomin R, DeFries JC, McClearn GE, McGuffin P . Behavioral Genetics, 5th edn. Worth: New York, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chipuer HM, Rovine MJ, Plomin R . LISREL modeling: genetic and environmental influences on IQ revisited. Intelligence 1990; 14: 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Devlin B, Daniels M, Roeder K . The heritability of IQ. Nature 1997; 388: 468–471.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Loehlin JC, Horn JM, Willerman L . Modeling IQ change: evidence from the Texas Adoption Project. Child Dev 1989; 60: 993–1004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McGue M, Bouchard Jr TJ, Iacono WG, Lykken DT . Behavioral genetics of cognitive ability: a life-span perspective. In: Plomin R, McClearn GE (eds). Nature, Nurture, and Psychology. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, 1993, pp 59–76.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Plomin R . Development, Genetics, and Psychology. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson W, Nijenhuis J, Bouchard TJ . Still just 1 g: consistent results from five test batteries. Intelligence 2008; 36: 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Spearman C . The Abilities of Man: Their Nature and Measurement. Macmillan: New York, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Petrill SA, Deater-Deckard K, Thompson LA, Schatschneider C, DeThorne LS, Vandenbergh DJ . Longitudinal genetic analysis of early reading: The Western Reserve Reading Project. Reading and Writing 2007; 20: 127–146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Thorndike RL, Hagen EP, Sattler JM . Guide for Administering and Scoring the Fourth Edition: Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. Riverside: Chicago, IL, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Oliver BR, Plomin R . Twins Early Development Study (TEDS): a multivariate, longitudinal genetic investigation of language, cognition and behavior problems from childhood through adolescence. Twin Res Hum Genet 2007; 10: 96–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kovas Y, Haworth CMA, Dale PS, Plomin R . The genetic and environmental origins of learning abilities and disabilities in the early school years. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 2007; 72: vii-160.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Price TS, Freeman B, Craig IW, Petrill SA, Ebersole L, Plomin R . Infant zygosity can be assigned by parental report questionnaire data. Twin Res 2000; 3: 129–133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Haworth CMA, Harlaar N, Kovas Y, Davis OSP, Oliver BR, Hayiou-Thomas ME et al. Internet cognitive testing of large samples needed in genetic research. Twin Res Hum Genet 2007; 10: 554–563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wechsler D . Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Third Edition UK (WISC-IIIUK) Manual. The Psychological Corporation: London, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Raven JC, Court JH, Raven J . Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Raven JC, Court JH, Raven J . Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices. HK Lewis: London, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Davis OSP, Haworth CMA, Plomin R . Learning abilities and disabilities: generalist genes in early adolescence. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2009 (in press).

  29. Iacono WG, McGue M, Krueger RF . Minnesota Center for Twin and Family Research. Twin Res Hum Genet 2006; 9: 978–984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Iacono WG, Carlson SR, Taylor J, Elkins IJ, McGue M . Behavioral disinhibition and the development of substance-use disorders: findings from the Minnesota Twin Family Study. Dev Psychopathol 1999; 11: 869–900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wechsler D . Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III. The Psychological Corporation: New York, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wechsler D . WISC-III. The Psychological Corporation: San Antonio, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wechsler D . Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Revised. Revised edn. Psychological Corporation: New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nichols RC, Bilbro WC . The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genetica 1966; 16: 265–275.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rhea SA, Gross AA, Haberstick BC, Corley RP . Colorado Twin Registry. Twin Res Hum Genet 2006; 9: 941–949.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. DeFries JC . Colorado reading project. In: Gray DB, Kavanagh JF (eds). Biobehavioral Measures of Dyslexia. York Press: Parkton, MD, 1985, pp. 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  37. DeFries JC, Olson RK, Pennington RF, Smith SD . Colorado Reading Project: An update. In: Duane DD, Gray DB (eds.). The Reading Brain: The Biological Basis of Dyslexia. York Press: Parkton, MD, 1991, pp 53–87.

    Google Scholar 

  38. DeFries JC, Filipek PA, Fulker DW, Olson RK, Pennington BF, Smith SD et al. Colorado learning disabilities research center. Learn Disabil Q 1997; 8: 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Luciano M, Wright MJ, Smith GA, Geffen GM, Geffen LB, Martin NG . Genetic covariance between processing speed and IQ. In: Plomin R, DeFries JC, Craig IW, McGuffin P (eds). Behavioral Genetics in the Postgenomic Era. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, 2003, pp 163–181.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Wright MJ, Martin NG . Brisbane Adolescent Twin Study: outline of study methods and research projects. Aust J Psychol 2004; 56: 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nyholt DR . On the probability of dizygotic twins being concordant for two alleles at multiple polymorphic loci. Twin Res Hum Genet 2006; 9: 194–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jackson DN . Multidimensional Aptitude Battery II: Manual. Sigma Assessment Systems: Port Huron, MI, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wechsler D . Examiner's Manual: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: Revised. The Psychological Corporation: New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Luciano M, Wright MJ, Geffen GM, Geffen LB, Smith GA, Evans DM et al. A genetic two-factor model of the covariation among a subset of Multidimensional Aptitude Battery and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised subtests. Intelligence 2003; 31: 589–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Boomsma DI, De Geus EJC, Vink JM, Stubbe JH, Distel MA, Hottenga JJ et al. Netherlands Twin Register: from twins to twin families. Twin Res Hum Genet 2006; 9: 849–857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Boomsma DI, van Beijsterveld TCEM, Beem AL, Hoekstra RA, Polderman TJC, Bartels M . Intelligence and birth order in boys and girls. Intelligence 2008; 36: 630–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Polderman TJC, Gosso MF, Posthuma D, van Beijsterveldt TC, Heutink P, Verhulst FC et al. A longitudinal twin study on IQ, executive functioning, and attention problems during childhood and early adolescence. Acta Neurol Belg 2006; 106: 191.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bartels M, Rietveld MJ, van Baal GC, Boomsma DI . Genetic and environmental influences on the development of intelligence. Behav Genet 2002; 32: 237–249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Rijsdijk FV, Vernon PA, Boomsma DI . Application of hierarchical genetic models to Raven and WAIS subtests: a Dutch twin study. Behav Genet 2002; 32: 199–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Posthuma D, Mulder E, Boomsma DI, De Geus EJC . Genetic analysis of IQ, processing speed and stimulus-response incongruency effects. Biol Psychol 2002; 61: 157–182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rietveld MJH, van der Valk JC, Bongers IL, Stroet TM, Slagboom PE, Boomsma DI . Zygosity diagnosis in young twins by parental report. Twin Res Hum Genet 2000; 3: 134–141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Shrout PE, Fleiss J . Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420–428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Rijsdijk FV, Sham PC . Analytic approaches to twin data using structural equation models. Brief Bioinform 2002; 3: 119–133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Neale MC, Maes HM . Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families. Kluwer Academic Publishers BV: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Neale MC, Boker SM, Xie G, Maes H . Mx: Statistical Modeling, 7th edn., VCU Box 900126 Department of Psychiatry: Richmond, VA, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  56. McGue M, Bouchard Jr TJ . Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex. Behav Genet 1984; 14: 325–343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Mascie-Taylor CGN . Spouse similarity for IQ and personality and convergence. Behav Genet 1989; 19: 223–227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Watkins MP, Meredith W . Spouse similarity in newlyweds with respect to specific cognitive abilities, socioeconomic status, and education. Behav Genet 1981; 11: 1–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Butcher LM, Davis OSP, Craig IW, Plomin R . Genome-wide quantitative trait locus association scan of general cognitive ability using pooled DNA and 500 K single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays. Genes Brain Behav 2008; 7: 435–446.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Plomin R, Spinath FM . Genetics and general cognitive ability (g). Trends Cogn Sci 2002; 6: 169–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kovas Y, Plomin R . Generalist genes: implications for cognitive sciences. Trends Cogn Sci 2006; 10: 198–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Wallace GL, Eric Schmitt J, Lenroot R, Viding E, Ordaz S, Rosenthal MA et al. A pediatric twin study of brain morphometry. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2006; 47: 987–993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Fulker DW, Cherny SS, Cardon LR . Continuity and change in cognitive development. In: Plomin R, McClearn GE (eds). Nature, Nurture, and Psychology. Psychological Association: Washington, DC, 1993, pp 77–97.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  64. Petrill SA, Lipton PA, Hewitt JK, Plomin R, Cherny SS, Corley R et al. Genetic and environmental contributions to general cognitive ability through the first 16 years of life. Dev Psychol 2004; 40: 805–812.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Rietveld MJ, Dolan CV, van Baal GC, Boomsma DI . A twin study of differentiation of cognitive abilities in childhood. Behav Genet 2003; 33: 367–381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Bouchard Jr TJ, Lykken DT, Tellegen A, McGue M . Genes, drives, environment, and experience: EPD theory revisited. In: Benbow CP, Lubinski D (eds). Intellectual Talent: Psychometric and Social Issues. John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, 1996, pp 5–43.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Plomin R . Genetics and Experience: The Interplay Between Nature and Nurture. Sage Publications Inc.: Thousand Oaks, California, 1994.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  68. Scarr S, McCartney K . How people make their own environments: a theory of genotype --> environmental effects. Child Dev 1983; 54: 424–435.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Harris JR . The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do. The Free Press: New York, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The GHCA consortium is supported by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation (no. 13575). The opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation. We thank Andrew McMillan for his support with data management. Support obtained for the GHCA consortium members’ twin studies are as follows. Western Reserve Reading Project (Ohio): US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD038075 and HD046167). Twins Early Development Study (United Kingdom): UK Medical Research Council (G0500079) and the US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD044454 and HD046167). Minnesota Twin Family Study (USA): USPHS grants AA009367, R01 DA005147 and R01 DA013240. Colorado Twin Studies (USA)—LTS: HD19802, HD010333, HD18426, MH043899 and the MacArthur Foundation; CTS: VA1296.07.1629B and DA011015; CLDRC: HD11681 and HD027802. Twin Cognition Study (Australia): Australian Research Council (A7960034, A79906588, A79801419, DP0212016 and DP0343921) and The Human Frontier Science Program (RG0154.1998-B). Netherlands Twin Register: Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO 051.02.060, NWO 480-04-004, NWO 575-25-012 and NWO/SPI 56-464-14192) and Human Frontiers of Science Program (RG0154/1998-B). D Posthuma is supported by NWO/MaGW VIDI-016-065-318.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Plomin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Molecular Psychiatry website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haworth, C., Wright, M., Luciano, M. et al. The heritability of general cognitive ability increases linearly from childhood to young adulthood. Mol Psychiatry 15, 1112–1120 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2009.55

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2009.55

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links