Original Article
Modern Pathology (2009) 22, 50–57; doi:10.1038/modpathol.2008.141; published online 19 September 2008
Utility of the World Health Organization classification criteria for the diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis in bone marrow
Malisha R Johnson1, Srdan Verstovsek2, Jeffrey L Jorgensen1, T Manshouri2, Raja Luthra1, Dan M Jones1, Carlos E Bueso-Ramos1, L Jeffrey Medeiros1 and Yang O Huh1
- 1Department of Hematopathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- 2Department of Leukemia, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Correspondence: Dr YO Huhz, MD, Department of Hematopathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 72, Houston, TX 77030, USA. E-mail: yhuh@mdanderson.org
Received 13 June 2008; Revised 7 August 2008; Accepted 7 August 2008; Published online 19 September 2008.
Abstract
In the World Health Organization classification, one major and four minor criteria are specified for the diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis. We report our experience using these criteria to diagnose systemic mastocytosis involving bone marrow. A total of 59 patients with clinically suspected systemic mastocytosis underwent comprehensive bone marrow examination, including immunophenotyping by immunohistochemistry and/or flow cytometry and molecular studies for KIT exon 17 mutations. Serum tryptase levels were also assessed. Of these 59, 53 (90%) patients met the diagnostic criteria for systemic mastocytosis. In these patients, multifocal dense infiltrates of mast cells, the major criterion, was observed in 36 (68%) patients. Atypical mast cell morphology was observed in 53 (100%), an aberrant immunophenotype was identified in 50 of 52 (96%), KIT mutation was present in 33 of 44 (75%), and an elevated serum tryptase (>20 ng/ml) was detected in 44 of 52 (85%). In the six patients in which bone marrow examination could not confirm systemic mastocytosis, one had systemic mastocytosis involving spleen, one patient had chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis, and four had no specific diagnosis, but systemic mastocytosis was still considered most likely. Of these six patients, atypical mast cell morphology was identified in five, aberrant immunophenotype in five, KIT mutation in two, and elevated serum tryptase in two. None of these cases met the major criteria. We conclude that the World Health Organization criteria are useful for the diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis in bone marrow specimens. The results also show the relative values of traditional morphologic criteria (ie, major criterion) and the results of ancillary testing (ie, minor criteria). However, as illustrated by the case of splenic systemic mastocytosis as well as the patient with chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis, the current World Health Organization system is neither completely sensitive nor specific for systemic mastocytosis.
Keywords:
systemic mastocytosis, bone marrow, tryptase, WHO criteria
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
Myeloproliferative neoplasms: contemporary diagnosis using histology and genetics
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology Review (01 Nov 2009)
RESEARCH
The stromal composition of mast cell aggregates in systemic mastocytosis
Modern Pathology Original Article
Frequent TET2 mutations in systemic mastocytosis: clinical, KITD816V and FIP1L1-PDGFRA correlates
Leukemia Original Article
Leukemia Original Article
Bone Marrow Transplantation Original Article

