Original Article
Modern Pathology (2008) 21, 1394–1402; doi:10.1038/modpathol.2008.142; published online 12 September 2008
Erythroid-predominant myelodysplastic syndromes: enumeration of blasts from nonerythroid rather than total marrow cells provides superior risk stratification
Sa A Wang1,2, Guilin Tang1, Oluwole Fadare3, Suyang Hao1, Azra Raza4, Bruce A Woda1 and Robert P Hasserjian5
- 1Department of Pathology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA
- 2Department of Hematopathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- 3Department of Pathology, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland AFB, San Antonio, TX, USA
- 4Myelodysplastic Syndrome Program, St. Vincent's Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- 5Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
Correspondence: Dr SA Wang, MD, Department of Hematopathology, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 72, Houston, Texas 77030-4009, USA. E-mail: swang5@mdanderson.org
Received 10 March 2008; Revised 15 May 2008; Accepted 12 June 2008; Published online 12 September 2008.
Abstract
In the FAB (French–American–British) and WHO (World Heath Organization) classifications, the blasts in erythroleukemia (M6a) are enumerated from the marrow nonerythroid rather than the total-nucleated cells. However, the method for blast calculation in erythroid-predominant myelodysplastic syndrome (erythroblasts
50%) is not specified either in the FAB or WHO classifications. We retrieved the files of 74 erythroid-predominant myelodysplastic syndrome patients (17% of all myelodysplastic syndrome) and 192 myelodysplastic syndrome controls (erythroblasts<50%). In erythroid-predominant myelodysplastic syndrome, by enumerating blasts from marrow nonerythroid cells rather than from total nucleated cells, 41 of 74 (55%) cases would be upgraded, either by disease subcategory or International Prognostic Scoring System. Importantly, the patients with <5% blasts demonstrated a superior survival to patients with
5% blasts (P=0.002); this distinction was lost when blasts were calculated from total-nucleated cells. Of cases with
5% blasts, cytogenetics rather than blast count correlated with survival. We conclude that in erythroid-predominant myelodysplastic syndrome, blast calculation as a proportion of marrow nonerythroid rather than total nucleated cells can better stratify patients into prognostically relevant groups.
Keywords:
myelodysplastic syndrome, erythroid precursors, blasts enumeration, prognosis, survival
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
Erythroid and megakaryocytic transformation
Oncogene Review
Drug Insight: emerging new drugs in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes
Nature Clinical Practice Oncology Review (01 Jul 2005)
Drug Insight: emerging new drugs in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes
Nature Clinical Practice Oncology Review (01 Jul 2005)
NEWS AND VIEWS
Hematology Azacitidine improves survival in myelodysplastic syndromes
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology News and Views (01 Sep 2009)

