1. ¹Department of Pathology, UMass Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
2. ²University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
3. ³Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

Correspondence: Dr M Mahalingam, MD, PhD, FRCPath, Dermatopathology Section, Department of Dermatology, Skin Pathology Laboratory, Boston University School of Medicine, 609 Albany Street, J-308, Boston, MA 02118, USA. E-mail: mahalinm@bu.edu

Received 31 May 2007; Revised 18 July 2007; Accepted 1 August 2007; Published online 21 September 2007.

Abstract

More recent techniques to characterize the genetic profile of soft-tissue tumors include the use of gene arrays. Using this technique, Apolipoprotein D (Apo D), a 33-kDa glycoprotein component of high-density lipoprotein, has been found to be highly expressed in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. To corroborate these results, we sought to ascertain the utility of Apo D by investigating its sensitivity and specificity in a variety of CD34-positive and CD34-negative cutaneous neoplasms including superficial acral fibromyxoma, sclerotic fibromas, and cellular dermatofibromas. Of interest, we found absence of Apo D expression in all four cases of superficial acral fibromyxoma. Of the remaining CD34-positive lesions, Apo D expression was noted in 35/36 (97%) cases of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, 3/5 (60%) giant-cell fibroblastomas, 4/4 (100%) sclerotic fibromas, 8/8 (100%) neurofibromas, and 1/1 (100%) solitary fibrous tumor. Of the CD34-negative lesions, Apo D expression was noted in 2/22 (9%) regular dermatofibroma, 23/45 (51%) cellular dermatofibroma, 10/10 (100%) malignant fibrous histiocytoma, 9/10 (90%) atypical fibroxanthoma, 7/8 (86%) cellular neurothekeoma, 9/9 (100%) malignant melanoma, 8/8 (100%) melanocytic nevi (100%), 0/2 superficial angiomyxoma, 0/15 fibromatosis, 0/1 nodular fasciitis, and 1/2 (50%) desmoplastic fibroblastomas. In summary, our findings indicate that Apo D expression is not specific to dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Its principal use as an immunohistochemical adjunct lies in its utility in differentiating superficial acral fibromyxoma from dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Although strong positive staining of Apo D in a markedly atypical fibrohistiocytic lesion is suggestive of atypical fibroxanthoma and/or malignant fibrous histiocytoma, further studies with the inclusion of other atypical spindled cell neoplasms are required to conclusively prove the same.