Original Article
Modern Pathology (2006) 19, 218–224. doi:10.1038/modpathol.3800520; published online 23 December 2005
Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase as a marker in the differential diagnosis of metanephric adenoma
Presented in part at the 93rd Annual Meeting of USCAP, March 2004, Vancouver, Canada.
Semra Olgac1, Brian Hutchinson1, Satish K Tickoo1 and Victor E Reuter1
1Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Correspondence: Dr VE Reuter, MD, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA. E-mail: reuterv@mskcc.org
Received 24 June 2005; Revised 18 October 2005; Accepted 18 October 2005; Published online 23 December 2005.
Abstract
Metanephric adenoma (MA), a well-described renal neoplasm, usually behaves in a benign fashion. It may have areas that are morphologically similar to papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) type, or epithelial (tubular predominant) type Wilms' tumor. Prior immunohistochemical studies of MA have reported variable staining patterns. Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), a molecular marker for prostate carcinoma, has subsequently been found to be overexpressed in breast, colorectal and ovarian cancers, among others. Recent microarray analysis of renal tumors has shown an increase of AMACR mRNA levels in papillary RCC but not in other subtypes. We investigated the utility of immunohistochemical staining for AMACR, cytokeratin 7(CK7), CD57 and WT1 to differentiate between the above-mentioned three neoplasms. Immunohistochemical stains were performed on paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 25 papillary RCC, 10 MAs and eight Wilms' tumors. AMACR was positive in one (10%) of 10 MAs and 24 (96%) of 25 papillary RCC, while it was negative in all Wilms' tumors. CK7 was positive in 20 of 25 papillary RCCs, focally positive in one Wilms' tumor and was negative in all MAs. CD57 was positive in all six MAs that were stained, focally positive in one of 25 papillary RCC and one of eight Wilms' tumors. WT1 was positive in seven of 10 MAs, three of 25 papillary RCCs and all eight Wilms' tumors. In conclusion, diffuse and strong immunoreactivity for AMACR may be useful in differentiating papillary RCC from MA but a panel which includes AMACR, CK7 and CD57 is better in this differential diagnosis. AMACR is not helpful in differentiating MA from Wilms' tumor, but CD57 is helpful in this differential diagnosis. WT1 may be useful in separating Wilms' tumor from MA and papillary RCC but is not helpful in differentiating MA from papillary RCC.
Keywords:
metanephric adenoma, papillary renal cell carcinoma, Wilms' tumor, racemase
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
Nature Clinical Practice Urology Review (01 Jun 2007)
RESEARCH
Identification of IGFBP-6 as an effector of the tumor suppressor activity of SEMA3B
Oncogene Original Article
CD10 is expressed in a subset of chromophobe renal cell carcinomas
Modern Pathology Original Article
The diagnostic and prognostic utility of claudin expression in renal cell neoplasms
Modern Pathology Original Article
Modern Pathology Original Article

