Original Article

Modern Pathology (2006) 19, 115–121. doi:10.1038/modpathol.3800489

Keratin expression in schwannoma; a study of 115 retroperitoneal and 22 peripheral schwannomas

The opinions and assertions contained herein are the expressed views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or Department of Defense. Presented in part at the USCAP in San Francisco, CA, March 1999, published in part as an abstract: Fanburg-Smith JC, Miettinen M Keratin reactivity in retroperitoneal schwannoma: a study of 90 cases. Modern Pathology 1999;12(1):abstract # 39.

Julie C Fanburg-Smith1, Mourad Majidi1 and Markku Miettinen1

1Department of Soft Tissue Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC, USA

Correspondence: Dr JC Fanburg-Smith, MD, Department of Soft Tissue Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 6825 16th Street, N.W, Building 54, Rm G090 Washington, DC 20306-6000, USA. E-mail: Fanburg@afip.osd.mil

Received 13 April 2005; Revised 30 June 2005; Accepted 2 August 2005.

Top

Abstract

Schwannomas have been variably observed to be glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) and occasionally keratin positive, with antibodies reacting with multiple keratins (pankeratins, keratin cocktail (CK), but specific keratin polypeptides (K) have not been examined for in schwannoma. Since we observed CK positivity in retroperitoneal schwannomas, we wanted to study a large group of retroperitoneal and peripheral schwannomas with GFAP, CK and Ks to explore the frequency and biologic background of this finding.We immunohistochemically evaluated a large number of retroperitoneal (n=115) and peripheral schwannomas (n=22) for GFAP, 16 individual K and AE1/AE3 keratin cocktail. The great majority (104/115, 90%) of retroperitoneal schwannomas were positive for GFAP, and 72/104 (69%) cases were positive for AE1/AE3, often extensively. Both markers highlighted the cellular Antoni A areas, particularly adjacent to the capsule, myxoid or degenerative areas, and perivascularly. Most cases 87/104 (84%) stained for both AE1/AE3 and GFAP at least focally. No tumors stained for keratins that were GFAP negative. None of the immunostains for individual K showed positivity comparable to that obtained with AE1/AE3 CK. However, 62% were focally positive for high molecular weight K1 and 8/61 (13%) for K7. None of the retroperitoneal schwannomas were positive for other keratins including K2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10 and K14-20. Peripheral schwannomas showed GFAP-positivity in only three of 22 cases (14%), and all were negative for keratins, both cocktail and individual K. We conclude that crossreactivity of AE1/AE3 with other intermediate filament proteins, such as GFAP, as previously observed in brain and glioma tissue, probably accounts for the extensive keratin-positivity seen in some retroperitoneal schwannomas. However, focal expression of K1 and K7 cannot be ruled out. Keratin-positive schwannomas should not be confused with other keratin-positive tumors, such as sarcomatoid carcinoma, mesothelioma, and synovial sarcoma.

Keywords:

schwannoma, keratin, GFAP, cross-reaction, immunohistochemistry, retroperitoneum, soft tissue

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated

NEWS AND VIEWS

The mojo of methylation

Nature Genetics News and Views (01 Sep 1999)

Focus on filaments: embryology to pathology

Nature News and Views (19 Aug 1982)

Extra navigation

.

naturejobs

ADVERTISEMENT