Original Article

Modern Pathology (2005) 18, 903–911. doi:10.1038/modpathol.3800366 Published online 14 January 2005

Invasion patterns in stage I endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinomas: a clinicopathologic analysis emphasizing favorable outcomes in carcinomas without destructive stromal invasion and the occasional malignant course of carcinomas with limited destructive stromal invasion

Shirley Chen1, Mario M Leitao2, Carmen Tornos1 and Robert A Soslow1

  1. 1Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
  2. 2Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

Correspondence: Dr RA Soslow, MD, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, C-524 New York, NY 10021, USA. E-mail: soslowr@mskcc.org

Received 25 August 2004; Revised 17 November 2004; Accepted 19 November 2004; Published online 14 January 2005.

Top

Abstract

Stage I, low-grade endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinomas have an excellent prognosis. Published data have suggested that destructive stromal invasion, a relatively uncommon finding in these tumors, is a poor prognostic factor. We investigated this by studying all FIGO stage I, grades 1 and 2 (of 3) endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinomas that were surgically staged at the Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center from 1980 to 2000. We undertook a careful review of all available slides using current diagnostic criteria and correlated histopathologic indices with clinical outcome data. Cases studied included 13 endometrioid ovarian carcinomas (stage IA, eight; stage IC, five) and six intestinal mucinous ovarian carcinomas (stage IA, three; stage IC, three). All of the tumors contained areas of expansile invasion, greater than that acceptable for microinvasion, and were thus diagnosed as carcinomas instead of borderline tumors. Nevertheless, nearly all demonstrated borderline tumor (noninvasive) components. Six tumors contained at least one focus of destructive stromal invasion (two endometrioid and four mucinous ovarian carcinomas). Four additional cases showed a focus suspicious for but not diagnostic of destructive invasion ('indeterminate for destructive invasion') (two endometrioid and two mucinous ovarian carcinomas). Follow-up data were available for 17 patients. The median follow-up was 81 months (range, 9–161 months). In all, 14 patients were alive with no evidence of disease (expansile invasion alone, eight; destructive stromal invasion, four; and indeterminate for destructive invasion, two). Three patients died of their disease (destructive stromal invasion, two; and indeterminate for destructive invasion, one). The size, number, and nuclear grade of destructive stromal invasion foci did not appear to have an impact on survival in this relatively limited number of patients. Outcome data in patients with stage I, low-grade endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinomas without destructive stromal invasion indicate that these tumors have a very limited malignant potential. The literature has not documented recurrences in this setting when the staging has been complete, the sampling adequate, and the cytologic features no more than grade 2, and metastasis to the ovary has been excluded. In contrast, carcinomas harboring even limited foci of destructive stromal invasion, although frequently cured surgically, can pursue a malignant clinical course.

Keywords:

endometrioid, mucinous, ovary, ovarian carcinoma, invasion, expansile invasion, destructive invasion

Extra navigation

.

naturejobs

ADVERTISEMENT