Home
Editorial
Milestones
Library
Advisors
Sponsors
Nature Milestones
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Development @nature.com
 
Links
Developmental Biology
Sinauer Associates
PubMed
Entrez Gene
Milestone 19 (1989)download digital edition
1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15|16|17|18|19|20|21|22|23|24|

1 July 2004 | doi:10.1038/nrn1467

Chasing the elusive inducer

Annette Markus, Associate Editor, Nature Neuroscience



The Xenopus experiments that demonstrated the default model of neural induction
For more than six decades, scientists around the world searched for the molecular basis of neural-plate induction, without much luck. Back in 1924, Spemann and Mangold had shown that a speck of tissue from the dorsal lip of the early newt gastrula could induce a second neural plate when transplanted into an ectopic site. This group of dorsal lip cells, the 'organizer', developed into mesodermal notochord and induced neural fates in the overlying ectoderm (see Milestone 1).

The standard hypothesis, arising from this and subsequent experiments, postulated that the organizer and resulting notochord, through secreted soluble molecules, instruct neural-plate differentiation in the overlying ectoderm. This straightforward idea took a few knocks over the years as it became apparent that a bewildering array of substances, and even physical manipulation of early embryos, could induce ectopic neural differentiation, and none of these were even remotely plausible candidates for an organizer signal. Nevertheless, this hypothesis reigned into the 1980s.

Then, in 1989, Grunz and Tacke published a surprising observation. It was known that isolated early ectoderm explants differentiated into epidermal tissue in vitro, but what if normal cell–cell interactions were disrupted? If the cells were dissociated then randomly reaggregated immediately, the result was again epidermis. But if reaggregation was delayed for an hour or more, neural markers began to be expressed, and if dissociated ectodermal cells were kept in suspension for 5 hours before reaggregation, they differentiated into neural tissue exclusively. This indicated that the absence, not the presence, of an intercellular signal was necessary for neural differentiation. Neural fate might indeed be the 'default' fate of ectodermal cells.

It was time for molecular biologists to step into the fray. Smith and Harland developed an assay to identify mRNAs that coded for proteins that could induce a neural plate in ventralized Xenopus embryos. They generated and systematically screened a library of mRNAs derived from hyperdorsalized gastrula-stage embryos. In 1992, they isolated noggin, a novel mRNA that could not only induce a neural plate (and complete dorso–ventral axis) without requiring the presence of mesoderm, but also was expressed appropriately in the dorsal lip and in the notochord. However, the mechanism of how noggin caused neural-plate formation, and how it fitted into the new 'default hypothesis', remained obscure.

The default hypothesis was bolstered by Hemmati-Brivanlou and Melton, who reported in 1994 that inhibition of the activin II receptor could, by itself, induce neural differentiation in the absence of the notochord.

In 1995, at last, the concept of a neural inducer and the idea of neural phenotype as the default outcome of ectodermal differentiation came together. De Robertis and colleagues identified chordin, another new dorsal lip protein that could directly induce a neuraxis. They also showed that bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP4), a growth factor related to activin, inhibited the neuralizing activity of both chordin and noggin in Xenopus embryos. The same group soon found that chordin directly binds and inactivates BMP4, and Harland and colleagues reported a similar function for noggin.

So, the default hypothesis seemed finally to stand on solid genetic and biochemical ground. It was proposed that neural induction requires the inhibition — by noggin, chordin or other molecules — of the epidermis-inducing, anti-neural BMP4 signal. The search for neural-plate instructive signalling molecules had lasted for seven decades and ended with the recognition that the instructive signal as such did not exist.

This is not the end of the story, however. Recent findings indicate that the neural ectoderm is specified in the blastula, before the Spemann organizer even forms. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling is required at this stage to enable later neural differentiation. In Xenopus at least, the anterior — but not the posterior — neural ectoderm is specified at the blastula stage, through a mechanism that already involves noggin and chordin. These and other studies are now elucidating the genesis of the 'default' state.


REFERENCES

ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPERS
Grunz, H. & Tacke, L. Neural differentiation of Xenopus laevis ectoderm takes place after disaggregation and delayed reaggregation without inducer. Cell Diff. Dev. 28, 211–218 (1989) Article
Smith, W.C. & Harland, R. M. Expression cloning of noggin, a new dorsalizing factor localized to the Spemann organizer in Xenopus embryos. Cell 70, 829–840 (1992) Article PubMed
Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. & Melton, D. A. Inhibition of activin receptor signaling promotes neuralization in Xenopus. Cell 77, 273–281 (1994) Article PubMed
Sasai, Y. et al. Regulation of neural induction by the Chd and Bmp-4 antagonistic patterning signals in Xenopus. Nature 376, 333–336 (1996) Article
Piccolo, S. et al. Dorsoventral patterning in Xenopus: inhibition of ventral signals by direct binding of chordin to BMP-4. Cell 86, 589–598 (1996) Article PubMed
Zimmermann, L. B. et al. The Spemann organizer signal noggin binds and inactivates bone morphogenetic protein-4. Cell 86, 599–606 (1996) Article PubMed
Streit, A. et al. Initiation of neural induction by FGF signalling before gastrulation. Nature 406, 74–78 (2000) Article PubMed
Kuroda, H. et al. Neural induction in Xenopus: requirement for ectodermal and endomesodermal signals via Chordin, Noggin, beta-Catenin and Cerberus. PLoS Biol. 2, 624–634 (2004)
 
FURTHER READING
Muñoz-Sanjuán, I. & Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. Neural induction, the default model and embryonic stem cells. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 3, 271–280 (2002) Article PubMed
De Robertis, E. M. & Sasai, Y. A common plan for dorsoventral patterning in Bilateria. Nature 380, 37–40 (1996) PubMed
Gilbert, S. F. Developmental Biology 7th edn: 327–337; 362–363 (2004) FREE
 

MILESTONE
Previous | Next
Milestones index
Printer version
Send to a friend
milestones in development digital edition - download your free copy here

SPONSORS

march of dimes

national institute of child health and human development (nichd)

juvenile diabetes research foundation international

ADVERTISEMENT
 

nature milestones
Home | Editorial | Milestones | Library | Advisors | Sponsors | Nature Milestones
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works © 2005 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy