Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works NATURE.COM NATURE NEWS NATUREJOBS NATUREEVENTS ABOUT NPG
Help Nature.com site index  
Leukemia
SEARCH     advanced search my account e-alerts subscribe register
Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
For authors
For referees
Contact editorial office
About the journal
For librarians
Subscribe
Advertising
naturereprints
Contact NPG
Customer services
Site features
NPG Subject areas
Access material from all our publications in your subject area:
Biotechnology Biotechnology
Cancer Cancer
Chemistry Chemistry
Dentistry Dentistry
Development Development
Drug Discovery Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology Evolution & Ecology
Genetics Genetics
Immunology Immunology
Materials Materials Science
Medical Research Medical Research
Microbiology Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience Neuroscience
Pharmacology Pharmacology
Physics Physics
Browse all publications
 
September 2002, Volume 16, Number 9, Pages 1603-1608
Table of contents    Previous  Article  Next   [PDF]
Review
CD34+ or CD34-: which is the more primitive?
M Engelhardt, M Lübbert and Y Guo

University of Freiburg Medical Center, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Freiburg, Germany

Correspondence to: M Engelhardt, University of Freiburg Medical Center Department of Hematology/Oncology, Hugstetterstr 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany; Fax: 49-761-270-3206

Abstract

Remarkable progress has been achieved in the characterization and isolation of primitive hematopoietic stem cells (HSC). HSC represent a very small subset of hematopoietic cells and provide self-renewal, possess differentiation capacity and allow a constant supply of the entire hematopoietic cell spectrum. Until recently, CD34 has been used as a convenient marker for HSC, since CD34+ cells have been shown to possess colony-forming potential in short-term assays, maintain long-term colony-forming potential in in vitro cultures and allow the expression and differentiation of blood cells from different hematopoietic lineages in in vivo models. Clinical and experimental protocols have targeted CD34+ cells enriched by a variety of selection models and have readily used these for transplantation, purging and gene therapies and targets for future organ replacement. Recent studies in murine and human models, however, have indicated that CD34- HSC exist as well, which possess engraftment potential and distinct HSC characteristics. These studies challenge the dogma that HSC are uniformly found in the CD34+ subset, and question whether primitive HSC are CD34+ or CD34-. In this review, results on murine and human CD34+ and CD34- HSC, differences between them and their possible interactions are examined.

Leukemia (2002) 16, 1603-1608. doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2402620

Keywords

hematopoietic stem cells (HSC); CD34+; CD34- cells

Introduction

Among billions of bone marrow (BM) cells a small fraction of primitive hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) exists that provide self-renewal, differentiation capacity and a constant supply of the whole cell spectrum of all hematopoietic lineages throughout our life. HSC are an ideal target for autologous and allogeneic transplantation, purging strategies, gene transfer and - with recent results on the plasticity of HSC - for organ replacement therapies. The understanding of mechanisms underlying their extensive proliferative capacity, their multilineage differentiation and self-renewal and their further characterization are keenly pursued. Since specific markers of the unique functional properties of HSC have not yet been identified, their detection and enumeration require the use of retrospective assays.

The cell surface sialomucin-like adhesion molecule CD34 has been used as a convenient marker for HSC.1,2,3 The CD34 antigen is expressed on 1-5% of mononuclear BM cells, on a subpopulation of hematopoietic cells, both HSC and early committed progenitors.3 CD34+ cells have been shown to possess colony-forming potential in short-term assays,1 maintain long-term colony forming potential in in vitro cultures4 and allow the differentiation of blood cell lineages in immunocompromised mice.5

Apart from cell surface markers for isolation of HSC, numerous other assays that measure the stem cell activity have been exploited.6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25 Clonal analyses using limiting dilution assays in Dexter-like cultures have been used (quality analysis), however, these are time-consuming due to the number of flasks that have to be analyzed.26,27 In the past, HSC have been characterized with respect to their ability to form spleen colonies in irradiated mice (CFU-S). Within various CFU-S types, most primitive HSC show marrow repopulating ability (MRA), resistance to 5-FU, low retention of the supravital fluorochrome rhodamine-123 (Rh-123) and are defined as pre-CFU-S.26,28 HSC have also been isolated by means of stroma-dependent long-term bone marrow cultures (LTBMC), either by weekly assessment of cobblestone area-forming cells (CAFC)26,29,30 or clonogenic cell output (determined by assessment of 5-8-week-old cultures; LTC-IC).31 In these frequency analyses, early CAFC were found to be highly sensitive to 5-FU, whereas week 5-8 CAFC were observed in the CD34+ Rh-123dull HLA-DRlow fraction.26,29,30

More recently, in vivo long-term marrow repopulating assays have been exploited in which the capacity of cells to reconstitute the hematopoietic system of host animals are measured. Of these, the sheep in utero transplantation system is used, in which human HSC are transferred into the sheep fetus in utero and are followed for the presence or absence of human blood cells after the sheep is born.32 Nevertheless, the human sheep xenograft model has limitations: it is not readily accessible, laborious, restricted to few institutions and therefore has not been useful clinically. A popular alternative for investigating the phenotype of human HSC is the nonobese diabetic mice with severe combined immunodeficiency disease (NOD/SCID) assay.33 This model is more accessible and allows detection of myeloid and lymphoid progeny within 6 weeks and at high efficiency. Limiting dilution analyses in this model have shown that the human cell engraftment is quantitative, independent of exogenous cytokine administration, and attributable almost exclusively to the CD38- subset of CD34+ cells.5,34,35 Nevertheless, CD34- human HSC capable of repopulating NOD/SCID mice34,36,37 and fetal sheep38 have also been detected.

Historical data and results from CD34 positive hematopoietic stem cell research

From early experimental results it became apparent that BM can be used to rescue lethally irradiated mice, and that BM-derived HSC form splenic nodules in irradiated recipients and allow hematopoietic reconstitution after radiation-induced hematopoietic failures.27,39

HSC were later discovered to represent only a fraction of hematopoietic cells of BM, mobilized peripheral blood (mPB) or umbilical cord blood (CB). Initial characterization of HSC was done on the basis of Rh-123 exclusion26,27 or lectin affinity and showed that CFU-S-8, CFU-S-12 and marrow repopulating cells or pre-CFU-S were physically largely separable.26,27,28,29 In addition, HSC were characterized using their expression of specific surface markers, such as in the mouse with the complete absence of hematopoietic lineage markers, the expression of the stem cell antigen (Sca-1) and low expression of Thy-1.6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13

After the successful hematopoietic reconstitution of baboons with selected CD34+ BM, CD34+ cells became the hallmark of murine and human HSC.40 Donnelly et al41 supported this, demonstrating that murine CD34+ long-term repopulating cells (LRC) are more than 100 times more abundant than CD34- LRC, and that CD34+ cells, not CD34- LRC could be maintained in suspension culture. Although Lin-CD34+ and Lin-CD34- cells contained LRC, he postulated that both constitute two functionally distinct populations, where in competitive repopulation experiments Lin-CD34+ cells could provide both short- and long-term engraftment, whereas Lin-CD34- cells were only capable of long-term engraftment.41

Human HSC are currently defined as Lin-CD34+DR- based on results of LTC-IC and various other assays.42,43,44,45,46 With use of the human fetal sheep xenogenic transplantation model, CD34+, Lin-CD34+CD38- and CD34+Thy1+Rh123low cells of BM and fetal liver (FL) have been shown to establish multilineage hematopoietic engraftment and can be transferred to secondary and tertiary recipients.5,24,42,47 Directly comparing CD34+ and CD34- cells, Gao et al have demonstrated that human CD34+ rather than CD34- cells provide the major contribution to hematopoietic engraftment in NOD/SCID mice (Table 1).48

CD34 negative hematopoietic stem cells

Recent data reveal the presence of highly purified Lin-CD34- subpopulations and suggest the absence of long-term reconstitution potential in the CD34+ fraction. This contrasts with former results on CD34+ HSC, the use of CD34 as a marker for HSC and the long-term effects of CD34+ selection in human transplant settings.49,50,51,52,53

Recently, selection of cells based on the rapid efflux of the fluorescent DNA-binding dye Hoechst 33342 (HO) has allowed the identification of a distinct cell population with long-term repopulating activity termed side-population (SP).53,54 The SP phenotype is due to the selective expression of ABC-G2/BCRP on HSC, which like the MDR/P-glycoprotein is a verapamil-sensitive member of the ABC transporter family. SP cells have long-term repopulating activity in mice, and largely lack CD34 expression.53,54 In an attempt to characterize SP cells further, we and others found that human SP cells are mostly CD34- and CD38-, as well as negative for CD3, CD14, glycophorin A, AC133 or CD90. In CFU assays, we did not observe highly increased colony-forming potential.55 In this context, Liu and Verfaillie56 has reported that CB SP cells are depleted of colony-forming cells (CFC) as compared with CD34+ non-SP cells. Of interest is that with further subfractioning, CB CD34+ SP cells have been shown to have a high clonogenic potential similar to that of CB Lin cells, whereas Lin-CD34- SP cells are nearly depleted of a CFU potential.57 It has also been demonstrated that common lymphocyte progenitors are present within the CB SP population.57 These may dilute the CFC in the human SP population, thereby leading to the low CFU readout. The most likely reason for the low CFU potential, however, is the immature SP phenotype, which does not allow these cells to grow in methylcellulose without prior differentiation in short-term suspension culture. Suspension culture leads to the maturation of less primitive progenitors,54 and with day 5 and day 7 expanded cells to an increased CFU potential.36,55 For LTC-IC, we observed the highest enrichment with apheresis (AP) specimens compared with CB or BM SP cells,55 in line with the finding that the LTC-IC potential of unsorted AP cells is higher as compared with CB or BM.58 Storms et al57 have also reported that the CD34+ SP fraction in CB was highly enriched for LTC-IC progenitors as compared with unsorted cells, whereas the CD34- SP population contained only a low proportion of LTC-IC. Of interest, FL SP cells have recently been shown to include all transplantable human HSC activity detectable in NOD/SCID mice. The HSC activity was confined to the CD34+CD38-SP+ population.59 These data suggest that the property of HSC within human SP cells, at least when assayed by LTC-IC and the NOD/SCID assays, is mostly confined to the CD34+ SP fraction, nevertheless does not exclude CD34- cells as candidate HSC.

For murine cells, the most direct evidence of CD34- HSC came from a study by Osawa et al,60 who reported that single CD34-c-kit+Sca-1+Lin- BM cells can reconstitute the lymphohematopoietic system for at least 10 months in 21% of lethally irradiated mice, whereas the majority of CFCs, CFU-S and progenitors, able to provide early but unsustained multilineage engraftment, were recovered among the CD34+ subset. Thus, while CD34- HSC were unable to provide short-term engraftment, they sustained long-term multilineage engraftment. To reconcile this observation, Morel et al61 separated murine Thy-1lowLin-/lowSca-1+ (TLS) into CD34+ and CD34- HSC and demonstrated that CD34+ TLS are highly enriched for CFC, CFU-S, cobblestone area forming cells (CAFC) and radioprotective cells and contain half of the CRU in TLS marrow. CD34- TLS - although depleted of progenitor cells - were highly enriched in HSC with competitive long-term repopulating potential. Although mice transplanted with CD34+ TLS recovered hematopoiesis faster compared with CD34- TLS, both populations were capable of sustaining long-term multilineage hematopoiesis for at least 6 months in primary and 5 months in secondary recipients.61

The issue supporting the existence of long-term repopulating cells only in the CD34- cell fraction, as opposed to long-term repopulating cells in both CD34+ and CD34- fractions,12,14,41,61 has become even more complex with initial reports on murine CD34- HSC that could be induced to express CD34 and increase their engraftment capacities following exposure to 5-FU or cytokines.62,63 Sato et al62 found that long-term engraftment cells reside in the CD34- population. He hypothesized that murine CD34- HSC exist in an extremely quiescent state, and that activation is required to cause an induction of cells, thereby making the latter more readily able to engraft in mice (Table 1).

For human cells, Zanjani et al38 demonstrated in vivo engraftment potential of human CD34-Lin- BM cells in fetal sheep in primary and secondary recipients, and Bathia et al36 showed engraftment of human CB CD34-Lin- cells in NOD/SCID mice and the appearance of CD34+ cells in animals transplanted with CD34- cells, suggesting the latter to be more primitive than the former. Dick's group thereby showed that CD34- cells have minimal clonogenic and long-term culture initiating cell activity, but possess in vivo repopulating activity in NOD/SCID mice, and that CD34- SCID repopulating cells (SRC) expand in suspension culture, whereas CD34+ SRC may expand but lose their repopulating ability.5,37 Moreover, CB Lin-CD34- cells have been shown to generate CD34+ HSC when cultured in the presence of a murine BM stroma cell line which suggest that Lin-CD34- cells possess extensive potential for the generation of CD34+ HSC in vitro and that these CD34+ cells produce CFU, LTC-IC and SRC with multilineage differentiation potential, all of which are characteristic features of HSC.65

Potential reasons for diverse results on CD34- and CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells

In contrast to primitive human BM HSC which are predominantly CD38-/low, long-term reconstituting murine stem cells express high levels of CD38, which suggests differences of human and murine cells in the expression of cell surface markers. Also, the coexpression of subpopulation with other markers, such as Sca-1 and c-kit,61,62,63,64 as compared with Lin-CD34+/CD34- cells does not seem to identify the same long-term repopulating capability cell population.13,41,48,64,65 Early discrepancies with respect to results on CD34+ and CD34- cells may also be due to the low but detectable levels of CD34 which can cause overlap in purified subsets.12,14,41,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68

Differences in the sensitivity of the in vivo engraftment assays may also be related to the lack of administration of accessory cells, administration of cytokines to the transplanted mice, experimental manipulation of the HSC cell preparation and/or myeloablative treatment of mice.36,38,39,40,41,60,61,62,63 In addition, differences in the long-term repopulation ability of CD34+ and CD34- cells may result from antibody staining irregularities so that clear guidelines for analyzing CD34- vs CD34+ cells seem appropriate.36,38,39,40,41,60,61,62,63

Moreover, if Lin-CD34- cells are not isolated with utmost care and contain one single or very few CD34+ cells, the latter may account for the HSC activity within the CD34- population. These variations underscore the necessity that further work is needed to characterize murine and human HSC, and to most ideally find a marker for positive selection of CD34- HSC.

Discussion and conclusions

Although evidence that CD34- cells represent HSC still appears immature, xenogenic human sheep in utero transplantation,38 murine studies by Osawa et al,60 demonstration of CD34- HSC in NOD/SCID36,61,62 and development of CD34+ cells with culture of initially CD34- HSC,62,63,64,66 suggest that HSC activity exists within the murine and human Lin-CD34- population. This redirects us to consider which cell population to select. If HSC exist within the CD34- population, the enrichment of CD34+ cells - current practice in stem cell transplantation and to date one of the most efficient and effective cell separation methods - may be of concern, since this may result in a loss of at least a portion of HSC. On the other hand, thousands of successful autologous and allogeneic transplantations with use of CD34+ selected cells makes the use of CD34+ HSC still valid.

One reason among others of the apparent CD34+ vs CD34- controversies - at least in the murine system - seems related to their activation and/or cycling state.65,66,67,68,69,70,71 Accepting recent work that indicates that CD34- HSC indeed exist,36,37,38,53,54 these seem likely to be quiescent, convert to CD34+ phenotype upon activation by 5-FU or after culture, and after transplantation, revert to a CD34- phenotype again.62,63,64,65,66,67 Nevertheless, since murine studies on CD34- and CD34+ HSC suggest that both are freely interconvertible,62 and if this applies to human HSC also, the CD34+ selection may be appropriate to distinguish potent HSC from quiescent stem cells or mesenchymal precursors. Thus, if the human CD34 expression pattern mirrors that in the murine system, quiescent CD34- HSC should be found in the BM which will, as their CD34+ counterpart, be activated with regard to proliferation and differentiation. Recent results on G0 and G1 CB CD34+ cells have revealed a more than 1000-fold difference in GM-CFC, 250-fold higher number of BFU-E and 600-fold higher expansion potential of G0 compared to G1 cells. This suggests that HSC reside preferentially in the G0 phase of the cell cycle.68 This has also been convincingly shown by Glimm et al,69 who demonstrated that human CB cells transiting the S/G2/M phases of the cell cycle after growth factor stimulation - due to a reversible silencing of the engraftment potential of HSC present in these populations - do not reenter G0 and do not repopulate the BM of irradiated NOD/SCID mice.

Finally, results demonstrating a variation in the engraftment potential of CD34+ and Lin-CD34- cells in fetal sheep recipients with respect to the source of progenitors are of interest: when serial transplants are performed in sheep fetus, the engraftment occurs earlier with mPB CD34+ than BM and is lower with PB CD34+ and Lin-CD34- than BM cells.70 Whereas comparable CFC, LTC-IC or cobblestone area forming cells per CD34+ cells are similar in mPB and BM, generation of secondary CFC from an individual LTC-IC in mPB is significantly lower than that of BM. Previous studies have distinguished distinct classes of HSC with different engraftment properties: of these, long-term repopulating cells (LTRC) have a lifelong ability to produce all blood cells and generate progeny that display similar potentialities upon transfer to secondary and tertiary recipients. Other cells with similar differentiation potentialities may reconstitute both myeloid and lymphoid compartments, but typically for less than 4 months. Additional types of short-term repopulating cells (STRC), that are either myeloid or lymphoid restricted have also been identified.34,71,72,73,74,75 In order to distinguish these distinct HSC classes, transplants in NOD/SCID-beta2 microglobulin-null (NOD/SCID-beta2m-/-) mice showed that repopulation of three distinct HSC takes place: one of myeloid restriction (STRC-M) and one with dual myeloid and lymphoid-repopulating ability (STRC-ML), neither of which efficiently engrafted NOD/SCID mice.34 In addition, NOD/SCID-beta2m-/- were engrafted after 6-8 weeks by more primitive LTRC-ML that engraft NOD/SCID mice equally efficiently. Of interest was that in mPB both STRC-M and STRC-ML activities were markedly elevated as compared with BM or CB. This relatively elevated STRC content of mPB seems to explain the apparently faster rates of hematopoietic recovery.34 Although the frequency of HSC with primary long-term repopulation may thus be lower in mPB than BM, supported by serial transplantation experiments which have exhausted the repopulating ability of Lin-CD34+ cells from PB faster than from BM,70 in the clinical setting, where large doses of PB MNC or CD34+ cells are given, these have been shown to contain sufficient cells with long-term engraftment potential.

Perspective

Transplants of hematopoietic cells have assumed an important role in the treatment of many malignancies. They hold much promise for the clinical application involving gene therapy, tolerance induction to facilitate allogeneic or xenogenic organ transplants and other modalities, where HSC purification and/or expansion before transplantation is desirable. Recently, exciting data have demonstrated that the potential of HSC is almost unlimited to generate whole organ systems.76,77,78,79 Therefore, the potential of CD34- and CD34+ HSC also lies within their apparent capacity of transdifferentiation to cells of widely diverse tissues, such as BM-derived mesenchymal cells, already used to treat osteogenesis imperfecta in children,79 as a source of hepatic oval cells,80 for cardiocytes,81 neural cells82,83and vice versa.84 Although the frequency of HSC, with respect to SP, Lin-CD34+CD38- or Lin-CD34- cells may be low, their isolation and use as targets for gene therapy, stem cell expansion, transplantation and/or regeneration of injured tissue, as shown for ischemic cardiac muscle,77,81 may verify their clinical relevance.

Deciding which BM, PB or CB population to select is an important (pre)clinical issue. Current results to date, as summarized in this paper, suggest only performing CD34 selections for transplant purposes when alternative methods are not available.

Much energy still needs to be placed in the CD34- isolation to best ensure that the latter is as pure as possible. This and the characterization of HSC will need further extensive investigation to finally clarify the value of CD34- cells.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grant C6 from the Center for Clinical Research (ZKF), University of Freiburg. We thank Prof Dr Roland Mertelsmann for his continuous support and Drs Hanno Glimm and Florian Otto for critical review of the manuscript and valuable comments.

References

1 Civin CI, Strauss LC, Brovall C, Fackler MJ, Schwartz JF, Shaper JH. Antigenic analysis of hematopoiesis III. A hematopoietic progenitor cell surface antigen defined by a monoclonal antibody against KG-1a cells. J Immunol 1985; 133: 157-164.

2 Andrews RE, Singer JW, Bernstein ID. Precursors of colony-forming cells in humans can be distinguished from colony-forming cells by expression of CD33 and CD34 antigen and light scatter. J Exp Med 1989; 169: 1721-1731. MEDLINE

3 Krause DS, Fackler MJ, Civin CI, May WS. CD34: structure, biology, and clinical utility. Blood 1996; 87: 1-13. MEDLINE

4 Sutherland HJ, Eaves CJ, Eaves AC, Dragowska W, Lansdorp PM. Characterization and partial purification of human marrow cells capable of initiating long-term hematopoiesis in vitro. Blood 1989; 74: 1563-1570. MEDLINE

5 Bhatia M, Wang JC, Kapp U, Bonnet D, Dick JE. Purification of primitive human hematopoietic cells capable of repopulating immune-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 5320-5325. Article MEDLINE

6 Orlic D, Bodine D. What defines a pluripotent hematopoietic stem cell (PHSC): will the real PHSC please stand up! Blood 1994; 84: 3991-3994. MEDLINE

7 Spangrude GJ, Heimfeld S, Weissman IL. Purification and characterization of mouse hematopoietic stem cells. Science 1988; 241: 58-62. MEDLINE

8 Uchida N, Weissman IL. Searching for hematopoietic stem cells: evidence that Thy-1.1lo Lin- Sca-1+ cells are the only stem cells in C57BL/Ka-Thy-1.1 bone marrow. J Exp Med 1992; 175: 175-184. MEDLINE

9 Okada S, Nakachi H, Nagayoshi K, Nagayishi K, Nishikawa S, Miura Y, Suda T. In vivo and in vitro stem cell function of c-kit- and Sca-1-positive murine hematopoietic cells. Blood 1992; 80: 3044-3050. MEDLINE

10 Ikuta K, Weissman IL. Evidence that hematopoietic stem cells express mouse c-kit but do not depend on steel factor for their generation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 1502-1506. MEDLINE

11 Szilvassy SJ, Lansdorp PM, Humphries RK, Eaves AC, Eaves CJ. Isolation in a single step of highly enriched murine hematopoietic stem cell population with competitive long-term repopulating ability. Blood 1989; 74: 930-939. MEDLINE

12 Morel F, Szilvassy SJ, Travis M, Chen B, Galy A. Primitive hematopoietic cells in murine bone marrow express the CD34 antigen. Blood 1996; 88: 3774-3784. MEDLINE

13 Krause DS, Ito T, Fackler MJ, Smith OM, Collector MI, Sharkis SJ, May WS. Characterization of murine CD34, a marker for hematopoietic progenitor and stem cells. Blood 1994; 84: 691-901. MEDLINE

14 Gallacher L, Murdoch B, Wu DM, Karanu FN, Keeney M, Bhatia M. Isolation and characterization of human CD34(-)Lin(-) and CD34(+)Lin(-) hematopoietic stem cells using cell surface markers AC133 and CD7. Blood 2000; 95: 2813-2820. MEDLINE

15 Civin CI, Almeida-Porada G, Lee MJ, Olweus J, Terstappen LWMM. Sustained, retransplantable, multilineage engraftment of highly purified adult human bone marrow stem cells in vivo. Blood 1996; 88: 4102-4109. MEDLINE

16 Link H, Arseniev L, BOmegahre O, Kadar JG, Diedrich H, Poliwoda H. Transplantation of allogeneic CD34+ blood cells. Blood 1996; 87: 4903-4909. MEDLINE

17 Urbano-Ispizua A, Rozman C, Martinaez C, Marin P, Briones J, Rovira M, Feliz P, Viguria MC, Merino A, Sierra J, Mazzara R, Caaeras E, Montserrat E. Rapid engraftment without significant graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic transplantation of CD34+ selected cells from peripheral blood. Blood 1997; 89: 3967-3973. MEDLINE

18 Engelhardt M, Bertz H, Afting M, Waller CF, Finke J. High- versus standard-dose filgrastim (rhG-CSF) for mobilization of peripheral-blood progenitor cells from allogeneic donors and CD34+ immunoselection. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 2160-2172. MEDLINE

19 Engelhardt M, Bertz H, WOmegasch R, Finke J. Analysis of stem cell apheresis products using intermediate-dose filgrastim plus large volume apheresis for allogeneic transplantation. Ann Hematol 2001; 80: 201-208. MEDLINE

20 Engelhardt M, Douville J, Behringer D, Jähne A, Smith A, Henschler R, Lange W. Hematopoietic recovery of ex vivo perfusion culture expanded bone marrow and unexpanded peripheral blood progenitors after myeloablative chemotherapy. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 27: 249-259. MEDLINE

21 Baum CM, Weissman IL, Tsukamoto AS, Buckle AM, Peault B. Isolation of a candidate human hematopoietic stem-cell population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 2804-2808. MEDLINE

22 Berardi AC, Wang A, Levine JD, Lopez P, Scadden DT. Functional isolation and characterization of human hematopoietic stem cells. Science 1995; 267: 104-108. MEDLINE

23 Petzer AL, Hogge DE, Lansdorp PM, Reid DS, Eaves CJ. Self-renewal of primitive human hematopoietic cells (long-term-culture-initiating cells) in vitro and their expansion in define medium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 1470-1474. MEDLINE

24 Civin CI, Trischmann T, Kadan NS, Davis J, Noga S, Cohen K, Duffy B, Gronewegen I, Wiley J, Law P, Hardwick A, Oldham F, Gee A. Highly purified CD34-positive cells reconstitute hematopoiesis. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2224-2233. MEDLINE

25 Larochelle A, Vormoor J, Hanenberg H, Wang JC, Bhatia M, Lapidot T, Murdoch B, Xiao XL, Kato I, Williams DA, Dick JE. Identification of primitive human hematopoietic cells capable of repopulating NOD/SCID mouse bone marrow: implication for gene therapy. Nat Med 1996; 2: 1329-1337. MEDLINE

26 Ploemacher RE, Brons NHC. Separation of CFU-S from primitive cells responsible for reconstitution of the bone marrow hemopoietic stem cell compartment following irradiation: evidence for a pre-CFU-S cell. Exp Hematol 1989; 17: 263-266. MEDLINE

27 Testa NG, Molineux G. Haematopoiesis. A Practical Approach IRL Press at Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1993.

28 Ploemacher RE, Brons NHC. Cells with marrow and spleen repopulating ability, and cells forming spleen colonies on day 16, 12 and 8 are sequentially ordered on the basis of increasing Rhodamine 123 retention. J Cell Physiol 1988; 136: 531-536. MEDLINE

29 Ploemacher RE, Van der Sluijs JP, Van Beurden CAJ, Baert MRM, Chan PL. Use of limiting dilution type long-term marrow cultures in frequency analysis of marrow-repopulating and spleen colony-forming hematopoietic stem cells in the mouse. Blood 1991; 78: 2527-2533. MEDLINE

30 Breems DA, Blokland EAW, Neben S, Ploemacher RE. Frequency analysis of human primitive haematopoietic stem cell subsets using a cobblestone area forming cell assay. Leukemia 1994; 8: 1095-1104. MEDLINE

31 Sutherland HJ, Lansdorp PM, Henkelman DH, Eaves AC, Eaves CJ. Functional characterization of individual human hematopoietic stem cells cultured at limiting dilution on supportive marrow stromal layers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87: 3584-3588. MEDLINE

32 Srour EF, Zanjani ED, Cornetta K, Traycoff CM, Flake AW, Hendrick M, Brandt JE, Leemhuis T, Hoffman R. Persistence of human multilineage, self-renewing lymphohematopoietic stem cells in chimeric sheep. Blood 1993; 82: 3333-3339. MEDLINE

33 Dick JE. Normal and leukemic human stem cells assayed in SCID mice. Semin Immunol 1996; 8: 197-206. Article MEDLINE

34 Glimm H, Eisterer W, Lee K, Cashman J, Holyoake TL, Nicolini F, Shultz LD, von Kalle C, Eaves CJ. Previously undetected human hematopoietic cell populations with short-term repopulating activity selectively engraft NOD/SCI-beta2 microglobulin-null mice. J Clin Invest 2001; 107: 199-206. MEDLINE

35 Holyoake TL, Nicolini FE, Eaves CJ. Functional differences between transplantable human hematopoietic stem cells from fetal liver, cord blood, and adult marrow. Exp Hematol 1999; 27: 1418-1427. Article MEDLINE

36 Bhatia M, Bonnet D, Murdoch B, Gan OL, Dick JE. A newly discovered class of human hematopoietic cells with SCID-repopulating activity. Nat Med 1998; 4: 1038-1045. Article MEDLINE

37 Nakamura Y, Ando K, Chargui J, Kawada H, Sato T, Tsuji T, Hotta T, Kato S. Ex vivo generation of CD34+ cells from CD34- hematopoietic cells. Blood 1999; 94: 4053-4059. MEDLINE

38 Zanjani ED, Almeide-Porada G, Livingston AG, Flake AW, Ogawa M. Human bone marrow CD34- cells engraft in vivo and undergo multilineage expression that includes giving rise to CD34+ cells. Exp Hematol 1998; 26: 353-360. MEDLINE

39 Till JE, McCulloch EA. A direct measurement of the radiation sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow cells. Radiat Res 1961; 14: 213-222.

40 Berenson RJ, Andrews RG, Bensinger WI, Kalamasz DF, Knitter G, Buckner CD, Bernstein ID. Antigen CD34+ marrow cells engraft lethally irradiated baboons. J Clin Invest 1988; 81: 951-955. MEDLINE

41 Donnelly DS, Zelterman D, Sharkis S, Krause DS. Functional activity of murine CD34+ and CD34- hematopoietic stem cell populations. Exp Hematol 1999; 27: 788-792. MEDLINE

42 DiGiusto D, Chen S, Combbs J, Webb S, Namikawa R, Tsukamoto A, Chen BP, Galy AHM. Human fetal bone marrow early progenitor for T, B and myeloid cells are found exclusively in the population expression high levels of CD34. Blood 1994; 84: 421-432. MEDLINE

43 Cashman JD, Lapidot T, Wang JCY, Doedens M, Schultz, Lansdorp P, Dick JE, Eaves C. Kinetic evidence of the regeneration of multilineage hematopoiesis from primitive cells in normal human bone marrow transplanted into immunodeficient mice. Blood 1997; 89: 4307-4316. MEDLINE

44 Hogan CJ, Shpall EJ, McNulty O, McNiece I, Dick JE, Schultz LD, Keller G. Engraftment and development of human CD34+-enriched cells from umbilical cord blood in NOD/LtSz-scid mice. Blood 1997; 90: 85-96. MEDLINE

45 Kawashima I, Zanjani E, Almaida-Porado G, Flake A, Zeng H, Ogawa M. CD34+ human marrow cells that express low levels of Kit protein are enriched for long-term marrow-engrafting cells. Blood 1996; 87: 4136-4142. MEDLINE

46 Srour E, Brandt J, Briddell R, Grigsby S, Leemhuis T, Hoffman R. Long-term generation and expression of human primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells in vitro. Blood 1993; 81: 661-669. MEDLINE

47 Sutherland D, Yeo E, Stewart A, Nayar R, DiGiusto R, Zanjani E, Hoffman R, Murray L. Identification of CD34+ subsets after glycoprotease selection: engraftment of CD34+Thy-1+Lin- stem cells in fetal sheep. Exp Hematol 1996; 24: 795-806. MEDLINE

48 Gao Z, Fackler MJ, Leung W, Lumkul R, Ramirez M, Theobald N, Malech HL, Civin CI. Human CD34+ cell preparations contain over 100-fold greater NOD/SCID mouse engrafting capacity than do CD34- cell preparations. Exp Hematol 2001; 29: 910-921. MEDLINE

49 Goodell MA. CD34+ or CD34-: does it really matter? Blood 1999; 15: 2545-2547.

50 Ogawa M. Changing phenotypes of hematopoietic stem cells. Exp Hematol 2002; 30: 3-6. MEDLINE

51 Dao MA, Nolta JA. CD34: to select or not to select? That is the question. Leukemia 2000; 14: 773-776, (review). MEDLINE

52 Andrews RG, Peterson LJ, Morris J, Potter J, Heyward S, Gough M, Bryant E, Kiem H. Differential engraftment of genetically modified CD34(+) and CD34(-) hematopoietic cell subsets in lethally irradiated baboons. Exp Hematol 2000; 28: 508-518. MEDLINE

53 Goodell MA, Brose K, Paradis G, Conner AS, Mulligan R. Isolation and function properties of murine hematopoietic stem cells that are replicating in vivo. J Exp Med 1996; 183: 1797-1806. MEDLINE

54 Goodell MA, Rosenzweig M, Kim H, Marks D, DeMaria MA, Paradis G, Grupp SA, Sieff CA, Mulligan R, Johnson RP. Dye efflux studies suggest that hematopoietic stem cells expressing low or undetectable levels of CD34 antigen exist in multiple species. Nat Med 1997; 3: 1337-1345. MEDLINE

55 Guo Y, Follo M, Kaiser S, Geiger K, Kapp U, Lübbert M, Engelhardt M. Isolation of hematopoietic stem cells with efflux capacity from mice and human bone marrow, muscle tissue and various other cell sources. Blood 2001; 98 (Suppl.): 116b, 4114.

56 Liu HJ, Verfaillie CM. Phenotypic and in vitro characterization of Hoechst 33342 side population in umbilical cord blood. Blood 2000; 96 (Suppl.): 664a.

57 Storms RW, Goodell MA, Fisher A, Mulligan R, Smith C. Hoechst dye efflux reveals a novel CD7+CD34- lymphoid progenitor in human umbilical cord blood. Blood 2000; 96: 2125-2133. MEDLINE

58 Pettengell R, Luft T, Henschler R, Hows JM, Dexter TM, Ryder D, Testa NK. Direct comparison by limiting dilution analysis of long-term culture-initiating cells in human bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, and blood stem cells. Blood 1994; 84: 3653-3659. MEDLINE

59 Uchida N, Fujisaki T, Eaves A, Eaves C. Transplantable hematopoietic stem cells in human fetal liver have a CD34+ side population (SP) phenotype. J Clin Invest 2001; 108: 1071-1077. MEDLINE

60 Osawa M, Hanada K, Hamada H, Nakachi H. Long-term lymphohematopoietic reconstitution by a single CD34-low/negative hematopoietic stem cells. Science 1996; 273: 242-245. MEDLINE

61 Morel F, Galy A, Chen B, Szilvassy SJ. Equal distribution of competitive long-term repopulating stem cells in the CD34+ and CD34- fractions of Thy-1lowSca-1+ bone marrow cells. Exp Hematol 1998; 26: 440-448. MEDLINE

62 Sato T, Laver JH, Ogawa M. Reversible expression of CD34 by murine hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 1999; 94: 2548-2554. MEDLINE

63 Tajima F, Sato T, Laver JH, Ogawa M. CD34 expression by murine hematopoietic stem cells mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Blood 2000; 96: 1989-1993. MEDLINE

64 Ando K, Nakamura Y, Chargui J, Matsuzawa H, Tsuji T, Kato S, Hotta T. Extensive generation of human cord blood CD34+ stem cells from Lin-CD34- cells in a long-term in vitro system. Exp Hematol 2000; 28: 690-699. MEDLINE

65 Summers YJ, Heyworth CM, De Wynter EA, Chang J, Testa NG. Cord blood G0 CD34+ cells have a thousand-fold higher capacity for generating progenitors in vitro than G1 CD34+ cells. Stem Cells 2001; 19: 505-513. MEDLINE

66 Tajima F, Deguchi T, Laver JH, Zeng H, Ogawa M. Reciprocal expression of CD38 and CD34 by adult murine hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 2001; 97: 2618-2624. MEDLINE

67 Ito T, Tajimi F, Ogawa M. Developmental changes of CD34 expression by murine hematopoietic stem cells. Exp Hematol 2000; 28: 1269-1273. MEDLINE

68 Dao MA, Nolta JA. Reversibility of CD34 expression on human stem cells that retain the capacity for secondary reconstitution. Blood 2000; 96 (Suppl): 581a.

69 Glimm H, Oh I-H, Eaves CJ. Human hematopoietic stem cells stimulated to proliferate in vitro lose engraftment potential during their S/G2/M transit and do not re-enter G0. Blood 2000; 96: 4185-4193. MEDLINE

70 Verfaillie CM, Almaida-Porada G, Wissink S, Zanjani ED. Kinetics of engraftment of CD34- and CD34+ cells from mobilized blood differs from that of CD34- and CD34+ cells from bone marrow. Exp Hematol 2000; 28: 1071-1079. MEDLINE

71 Morrison SJ, Weissman IL. The long-term repopulating subset of hematopoietic stem cells is deterministic and isolatable by phenotype. Immunity 1994; 1: 6611-6673.

72 Magli MC, Iscove NN, Odartchenko N. Transient nature of early hematopoietic spleen colonies. Nature 1982; 295: 527-529. MEDLINE

73 Kondo M, Weissman IL, Akashi K. Identification of clonogenic common lymphoid progenitors in mouse bone marrow. Cell 1997; 91: 661-672. MEDLINE

74 Akashi K, Traver D, Miyamoto T, Weissmann IL. A clonogenic common myeloid progenitor that gives rise to all myeloid lineages. Nature 2000; 404: 193-197. Article MEDLINE

75 Eaves AC, Eaves CJ. Growth control in leukemia. Prog Clin Biol Res 1990; 354: 223-236.

76 Jackson KA, Mi T, Goodell MA. Hematopoietic potential of stem cells isolated from murine skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 14482-14486. Article MEDLINE

77 Jackson KA, Majka SM, Wang H, Pocius J, Hartley CJ, Majesky MW, Entman ML, Michael LH, Hirschi KK, Goodell MA. Regeneration of ischemic cardiac muscle and vascular endothelium by adult stem cells. J Clin Invest 2001; 107: 1395-1402. MEDLINE

78 Goodell MA. Stem cells: is there a future in plastics? Curr Opin Cell Biol 2001; 13: 662-665. MEDLINE

79 Horwitz EM, Prockop DJ, Fitzpatrick LA, Koo WWK, Gordon PL, Neel M, Sussman M, Orchard P, Marx JC, Pyeritz RE, Brenner MK. Transplantibility and therapeutic effects of bone marrow derived mesenchymal cells in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Med 1999; 5: 309-313. Article MEDLINE

80 Petersen BE, Bowen WC, Patrene KD, Mars WM, Sullivan AK, Murase N, Boggs SS, Greenberger JS, Goff JP. Bone marrow as a potential source of hepatic oval cells. Science 1999; 284: 1168-1170. Article MEDLINE

81 Makino S, Fukuda K, Miyoshi S, Konishi F, Kodama H, Pan J, Sno M, Takahashi T, Hori S, Abe H, Hata J, Umezawa A, Ogawa S. Cardiomyocytes can be generated from bone marrow cells in vitro. J Clin Invest 1999; 103: 697-705. MEDLINE

82 Mezey E, Chandross KJ, Harta G, Maki RA, McKercher SR. Turning blood into brain: cells bearing neuronal antigens generated in vivo from bone marrow. Science 2000; 290: 1779-1782. MEDLINE

83 Brazelton TR, Rossi FM, Keshet GI, Blau HM. From marrow to brain: expression of neuronal phenotypes in adult mice. Science 2000; 290: 1775-1779. Article MEDLINE

84 Bjornson CRR, Rietze RL, Reynolds BA, Magli MC, Vescovi AL. Turning brain into blood: a hematopoietic fate adopted by adult neuronal stem cells in vivo. Science 1999; 283: 534-537. Article MEDLINE

Tables

Table 1 Selected results on CD34+ and CD34- HSC

Received 5 March 2002; accepted 21 April 2002
September 2002, Volume 16, Number 9, Pages 1603-1608
Table of contents    Previous  Article  Next    [PDF]
Privacy Policy © 2002 Nature Publishing Group