Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Manuscript
  • Published:

Clinical Laboratory Correlates

Survival time in a population-based consecutive series of adult acute myeloid leukemia – the prognostic impact of karyotype during the time period 1976–1993

Abstract

A consecutive population-based series of 372 adult acute myeloid leukemias, successfully cytogenetically investigated at a single center between 1976 and 1993, is reported. All medical records were reviewed in order to ascertain the prognostic impact of karyotype, divided into three groups; favorable (t(8;21), t(15;17), and inv(16) irrespective of karyotypic complexity; n= 40), poor (der(1;7), inv(3), −5, del(5q), −7, t(9;22), and complex karyotypes including whole or partial losses of chromosomes 5 and/or 7; n = 56), and intermediate (other abnormalities or normal karyotype; n = 276). The possible modification by age, gender, time period, morphologic subtype, and bone marrow transplantation (BMT) on this prognostic impact was also determined. The chemotherapy regimens used were heterogeneous over time but principally the same at any given point in time. The majority of the patients were treated with combinations including an anthracycline and cytarabine with curative intent. Gender, morphology, and BMT did not significantly modify the effect of cytogenetic patterns on survival time, whereas age and time period did. The hazard ratios for the subgroups favorable, intermediate, and poor were 1.0, 1.2 and 1.9 at age 20–49; 1.0, 2.5 and 4.5 at age 50–64; 1.0, 4.1 and 11.4 at age 65–74; 1.0, 1.4 and 2.2 for the time period 1976–1987 and 1.0, 2.0 and 6.7 for 1988–1993. The salient feature of the Kaplan–Meier curves was the improved survival during the later time period for patients with favorable and intermediate cytogenetic abnormalities. The present findings thus suggest that it is mainly these patient groups that have benefited from advances in therapy, including supportive care.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heim S, Mitelman F . Cancer Cytogenetics, 2nd edn Wiley-Liss: New York 1995

    Google Scholar 

  2. Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, Fenaux P, Morel P, Sanz G, Sanz M, Vallespi T, Hamblin T, Oscier D, Ohyashiki K, Toyama K, Aul C, Mufti G, Bennett J . International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes Blood 1997 89: 2079–2088

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kersey JH . Fifty years of studies of the biology and therapy of childhood leukemia Blood 1997 90: 4243–4251

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Faderl S, Kantarjian HM, Talpaz M, Estrov Z . Clinical significance of cytogenetic abnormalities in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia Blood 1998 91: 3995–4019

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sakurai M, Sandberg AA . Prognosis of acute myeloblastic leukemia: chromosomal correlation Blood 1973 41: 93–104

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marosi C, Köller U, Koller-Weber E, Schwarzinger I, Schneider B, Jäger U, Vahls P, Nowotny H, Pirc-Danoewinata H, Steger G, Kreiner G, Wagner B, Lechner K, Lutz D, Bettelheim P, Haas OA . Prognostic impact of karyotype and immunologic phenotype in 125 adult patients with de novo AML Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1992 61: 14–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Arthur DC, Berger R, Golomb HM, Swansbury GJ, Reeves BR, Alimena G, Van Den Berghe H, Bloomfield CD, de la Chapelle A, Dewald GW, Garson OM, Hagemeijer A, Kaneko Y, Mitelman F, Pierre RV, Ruutu T, Sakurai M, Lawler SD, Rowley JD . The clinical significance of karyotype in acute myelogenous leukemia Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1989 40: 203–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berger R, Bernheim A, Ochoa-Noguera ME, Daniel M-T, Valensi F, Sigaux F, Flandrin G, Boiron M . Prognostic significance of chromosome abnormalities in acute nonlymphocytic leukemla: a study of 343 patients Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1987 28: 293–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dastugue N, Payen C, Lafage-Pochitaloff M, Bernard P, Leroux D, Huguet-Rigal F, Stoppa AM, Marit G, Molina L, Michallet M, Maraninchi D, Attal M, Reiffers J . Prognostic significance of karyotype in de novo adult acute myeloid leukemia. The BGMT group Leukemia 1995 9: 1491–1498

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F, Wheatley K, Harrison C, Harrison G, Rees J, Hann I, Stevens R, Burnett A, Goldstone A . The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children's Leukaemia Working Parties Blood 1998 92: 2322–2333

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fourth International Workshop on Chromosomes in Leukemia . Clinical significance of chromosomal abnormalities in acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1984 11: 332–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Keating MJ, Smith TL, Kantarjian H, Cork A, Walters R, Trujillo JM, McCredie KB, Gehan EA, Freireich EJ . Cytogenetic pattern in acute myelogenous leukemia: a major reproducible determinant of outcome Leukemia 1988 2: 403–412

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marlton P, Keating M, Kantarjian H, Pierce S, O'Brien S, Freireich EJ, Estey E . Cytogenetic and clinical correlates in AML patients with abnormalities of chromosome 16 Leukemia 1995 9: 965–971

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Plantier I, Lai JL, Wattel E, Bauters F, Fenaux P . Inv(16) may be one of the only ‘favorable’ factors in acute myeloid leukemia: a report on 19 cases with prolonged follow-up Leukemia Res 1994 18: 885–888

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Secker-Walker LM, Mehta A, Bain B . Abnormalities of 3q21 and 3q26 in myeloid malignancy: a United Kingdom Cancer Cytogenetic Group study Br J Haematol 1995 91: 490–501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mauritzson N, Johansson B, Albin M, Billström R, Ahlgren T, Mikoczy Z, Nilsson PG, Hagmar L, Mitelman F . A single-center population-based consecutive series of 1500 cytogenetically investigated adult hematologic malignancies: karyotypic features in relation to morphology, age and gender Eur J Haematol 1999 62: 95–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DAG, Gralnick HR, Sultan C . Proposals for the classification of the acute leukaemias Br J Haematol 1976 33: 451–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR, Sultan C . Criteria for the diagnosis of acute leukemia of megakaryocyte lineage (M7). A report of the French–American–British Cooperative Group Ann Intern Med 1985 103: 460–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DAG, Gralnick HR, Sultan C . Criteria for the recognition of minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML-M0) Br J Haematol 1991 78: 325–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR, Sultan C . Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. A report of the French–American–British Cooperative Group Ann Intern Med 1985 103: 620–625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Öst Å, Reizenstein P . Minimal diagnostic criteria for the myelodysplastic syndrome Leukemia Res 1992 16: 9–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ISCN. An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Mitelman F (ed) S Karger: Basel 1995

  23. Clayton D, Hills M . Statistical Models in Epidemiology Oxford University Press: New York 1993

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li Y-S, Khalid G, Hayhoe FGJ . Correlation between chromosomal pattern, cytological subtypes, response to therapy, and survival in acute myeloid leukemia Scand J Haematol 1983 30: 265–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mitus AJ, Miller KB, Schenkein DP, Ryan HF, Parsons SK, Wheeler C, Antin J . Improved survival for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia J Clin Oncol 1995 13: 560–569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. de Nully Brown P, Jurlander J, Pedersen-Bjergaard J, Victor MA, Geisler CH . The prognostic significance of chromosomal analysis and immunophenotyping in 117 patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia Leukemia Res 1997 21: 985–995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bloomfield CD, Shuma C, Regal L, Philip PP, Hossfeld DK, Hagemeijer AM, Garson OM, Peterson BA, Sakurai M, Alimena G, Berger R, Rowley JD, Ruutu T, Mitelman F, Dewald GW, Swansbury J . Long-term survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia Cancer Suppl 1997 80: 2191–2198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fenaux P, Preudhomme C, Lai JL, Morel P, Beuscart R, Bauters F . Cytogenetics and their prognostic value in de novo acute myeloid leukaemia: a report on 283 cases Br J Haematol 1989 73: 61–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schiffer CA, Lee EJ, Tomiyasu T, Wiernik PH, Testa JR . Prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities in patients with de novo acute nonlymphocytic leukemia Blood 1989 73: 263–270

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tien H-F, Wang C-H, Lin M-T, Lee F-Y, Liu M-C, Chuang S-M, Chen Y-C, Shen M-C, Lin K-H, Lin D-T . Correlation of cytogenetic results with immunophenotype, genotype, clinical features, and ras mutation in acute myeloid leukemia. A study of 235 Chinese patients in Taiwan Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1995 84: 60–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tashiro S, Kyo T, Tanaka K, Oguma N, Hashimoto T, Dohy H, Kamada N . The prognostic value of cytogenetic analyses in patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia treated with the same intensive chemotherapy Cancer 1992 70: 2809–2815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bloomfield CD, Lawrence D, Byrd JC, Carroll A, Pettenati MJ, Tantravahi R, Patil SR, Davey FR, Berg DT, Schiffer CA, Arthur DC, Mayer RJ . Frequency of prolonged remission duration after high-dose cytarabine intensification in acute myeloid leukemia varies by cytogenetic subtype Cancer Res 1998 58: 4173–4179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Weh HJ, Kuse R, Hoffmann R, Seeger D, Suciu S, Kabisch H, Ritter J, Hossfeld DK . Prognostic significance of chromosome analysis in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) Blut 1988 56: 19–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Stasi R, Del Poeta G, Masi M, Tribalto M, Venditti A, Papa G, Nicoletti B, Vernole P, Tedeschi B, Delaroche I, Mingarelli R, Dallapiccola B . Incidence of chromosome abnormalities and clinical significance of karyotype in de novo acute myeloid leukemia Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1993 67: 28–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Musilova J, Michalova K, Zemanova Z, Brezinova Z, Dohnalova A, Sajdova J . Cytogenetic study of acute myeloid leukemia: comparison of data obtained in 1991–1996 and 1982–1988 Neoplasma 1998 45: 292–295

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Estey E, deLima M, Strom S, Pierce S, Freireich EJ, Keating MJ . Long-term follow-up of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia treated at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Cancer 1997 80: 2176–2180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. The Swedish Cancer Registry . Cancer Incidence in Sweden 1996 Norstedts: Stockholm 1998

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bloomfield CD . Prognostic factors for selecting curative therapy for adult acute myeloid leukemia Leukemia 1992 6: (Suppl. 4) 65–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Head D, Kopecky KJ, Weick J, Files JC, Ryan D, Foucar K, Montiel M, Bickers J, Fishleder A, Miller M, Spier C, Hanson C, Bitter M, Braziel R, Mills G, Welborn J, Williams W, Hewlett J, Willman C, Appelbaum F . Effect of aggressive daunomycin therapy on survival in acute promyelocytic leukemia Blood 1995 86: 1717–1728

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Stasi R, Venditti A, Del Poeta G, Aronica G, Dentamaro T, Cecconi M, Stipa E, Scimò MT, Masi M, Amadori S . Intensive treatment of patients age 60 years and older with de novo acute myeloid leukemia Cancer 1996 77: 2476–2488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Zittoun R, Cadiou M, Bayle C, Suciu S, Solbu G, Hayat M . Prognostic value of cytologic parameters in acute myelogenous leukemia Cancer 1984 53: 1526–1532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Leith CP, Kopecky KJ, Godwin J, McConnell T, Slovak ML, Chen I-M, Head DR, Appelbaum FR, Willman CL . Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: assessment of multidrug resistance (MDR1) and cytogenetics distinguishes biologic subgroups with remarkably distinct responses to standard chemotherapy. A Southwest Oncology Group study Blood 1997 89: 3323–3329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Baudard M, Marie JP, Cadiou M, Viguie F, Zittoun R . Acute myelogenous leukaemia in the elderly: retrospective study of 235 consecutive patients Br J Haematol 1994 86: 82–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Büchner T, Heinecke A . The role of prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia Leukemia 1996 10: (Suppl. 1) S28–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society, the Swedish Council for Work Life Research, PREEM Research Foundation, Georg Danielsson's Fund, John Persson's Foundation, Gunnar, Arvid and Elisabeth Nilsson's Foundation, and Lund University Hospital Funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mauritzson, N., Johansson, B., Albin, M. et al. Survival time in a population-based consecutive series of adult acute myeloid leukemia – the prognostic impact of karyotype during the time period 1976–1993. Leukemia 14, 1039–1043 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2401788

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2401788

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links