TABLE 1
FROM:
Quantitative analysis of estrogen receptor heterogeneity in breast cancer
Gina G Chung, Maciej P Zerkowski, Sriparna Ghosh, Robert L Camp and David L Rimm
BACK TO ARTICLETable 1. Slide-to-slide ER heterogeneity
| Case | Block | Pathologist (%) | Mean AQUAa | Standard error | P value; Block comparisons | P value; ANOVA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1 | 0 | 3.667 | 0.074 | 0.2446; 1 vs 2 | 0.1995 |
| 2 | 3.461 | 0.152 | ||||
| B | 1 | 10 | 3.332 | 0.072 | <0.0001; 1 vs 2 | <0.0001 |
| 2 | 2.911 | 0.039 | <0.0001; 2 vs 3 | |||
| 3 | 2.51 | 0.048 | <0.0001; 1 vs 3 | |||
| C | 1 | 20 | 51.803 | 1.105 | <0.0001; 1 vs 2 | <0.0001 |
| 2 | 25.884 | 0.976 | <0.0001; 1 vs 3 | |||
| 3 | 21.433 | 0.733 | <0.0001; 1 vs 4 | |||
| 4 | 40.12 | 1.444 | 0.0077; 2 vs 3 | |||
| <0.0001; 2 vs 4 | ||||||
| <0.0001; 3 vs 4 | ||||||
| D | 1 | 20 | 100 | 2.55 | <0.0001; 1 vs 2 | <0.0001 |
| 2 | 40.978 | 3.71 | ||||
| G | 1 | 80 | 6.356 | 0.228 | <0.0001; 1 vs 2b | <0.0001 |
| 2 | 10.063 | 0.289 | 0.0018; 1 vs 3 | |||
| 3 | 5.527 | 0.138 | <0.0001; 1 vs 4 | |||
| 4 | 8.105 | 0.225 | <0.0001; 1 vs 5 | |||
| 5 | 4.979 | 0.167 | <0.0001; 2 vs 3b | |||
| <0.0001; 2 vs 4b | ||||||
| <0.0001; 2 vs 5b | ||||||
| <0.0001; 3 vs 4 | ||||||
| 0.1023; 3 vs 5 | ||||||
| <0.0001; 4 vs 5 | ||||||
| H | 1 | 90 | 63.836 | 3.31 | <0.0001; 1 vs 3 | <0.0001 |
| 2 | 57.639 | 1.935 | 0.0811; 1 vs 2 | |||
| 3 | 45.614 | 2.466 | 0.0007; 2 vs 3 | |||
| I | 1 | 95 | 20.845 | 1.027 | 0.2047; 1 vs 2 | 0.2047 |
| 2 | 18.306 | 1.756 | ||||
| J | 1 | 100 | 10.151 | 1.162 | 0.0042; 1 vs 2b | 0.0253 |
| 2 | 7.035 | 0.366 | 0.0117; 1 vs 3b | |||
| 3 | 6.93 | 0.285 | 0.69; 1 vs 4 | |||
| 4 | 10.614 | 0.797 | 0.9348; 2 vs 3 | |||
| 0.0025; 2 vs 4b | ||||||
| 0.0067; 3 vs 4 | ||||||
| K | 1 | 100 | 36.778 | 2.056 | <0.0001; 1 vs 2 | <0.0001 |
| 2 | 69.955 | 4.36 | ||||
a Normalized score to tissue controls and to maximum score (case D1).
b Discordant block to block comparisons with AQUA binary values.
