Article
Lab Invest 2000, 80:1553–1559
Clonal Analysis of Micronodules in Virus C-Induced Liver Cirrhosis Using Laser Capture Microdissection (LCM) and HUMARA Assay
This work was supported by grants from the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer and the Comité des Hauts-De-Seine de la Ligue contre le Cancer.
Valérie Paradis1,2, Delphine Dargere2, Franck Bonvoust2, Laura Rubbia-Brandt3, Nathalie Bâ1, Paulette Bioulac-Sage4 and Pierre Bedossa1,2
- 1Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Paris, France
- 2UPRES A 8067 Faculté de Pharmacie, Paris, France
- 3Institut de Pathologie, Geneva, Switzerland
- 4Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, CHU Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
Correspondence: Dr. Valérie Paradis, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Hôpital de Bicêtre, 78, rue du Gal Leclerc, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Paris, France. Fax: 33 1 45 21 32 81; E-mail:vparadis@teaser.fr
Received 20 July 2000.
Abstract
Most hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) arise from malignant transformation of regenerative cirrhotic nodules. Because HCC has a very poor prognosis, detection of these premalignant lesions may improve the management of patients with cirrhosis. In this regard, clonal analysis of liver micronodules should be of particular interest in order to differentiate polyclonal regenerative micronodules from monoclonal neoplastic potentially malignant micronodules. To address this issue, 112 micronodules from 15 cases of explanted liver cirrhosis were carefully microdissected from paraffin-embedded tissue using a laser capture microscopy system. Clonal analysis was performed by analyzing X-chromosome inactivation, as indicated by the methylation status of the human androgen receptor gene (HUMARA). For each microdissected micronodule, a large set of pathological features was evaluated and correlated with their clonal status. Clonal analysis showed that 57 micronodules (51%) were monoclonal and 55 (49%) were polyclonal. Prevalence of monoclonal nodules ranged from 25% to 71% according to cases. In all cases, mono- and polyclonal nodules were randomly distributed in the cirrhotic liver. Although the clonal status was not significantly affected by the presence or absence of macronodules in the adjacent liver, size of monoclonal micronodules was significantly larger than size of polyclonal micronodules (mean size of the monoclonal nodules: 3 + 0.1 mm vs mean size of the polyclonal nodules: 2.5
0.1 mm, p = 0.007). Among the elementary pathological features evaluated, only the presence of iron overload was correlated with a monoclonal status (p = 0.04). In conclusion, clonal analysis of liver cirrhosis shows that 51% of micronodules are monoclonal lesions, supporting the notion that liver cirrhosis is a multineoplastic lesion. Because monoclonality is a marker of neoplasia, cirrhosis with accumulation of monoclonal nodules may be carefully followed, and monoclonal nodules should be screened for additional markers to assess their biological behavior.

