Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Technique
  • Published:

Feasibility of the laryngeal tube airway for artificial ventilation in pigs and comparison with the laryngeal mask airway

Abstract

Airway management in anesthetized pigs is known to be technically demanding, and the 'gold standard' technique of endotracheal intubation is particularly difficult to master. The authors investigated the feasibility of the laryngeal tube as an alternative technique for airway management in German Landrace pigs (n = 5). They compared this method with the laryngeal mask, which is considered to be an effective yet relatively straightforward tool for porcine airway management. One after the other, investigators attempted to establish an airway in each anesthetized, artificially ventilated pig using each device. The laryngeal tube was too short to intubate the largest pig (weighing 45 kg), and it took investigators slightly longer to insert this device compared with the laryngeal mask. With the laryngeal mask, there were several incidents of gastric insufflation. Despite these complications, all investigators were able to establish a secure airway and maintain oxygenation with the laryngeal tube, and all subjectively rated both devices as easy to use.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Laryngeal mask (top; size 5) and laryngeal tube (bottom; size 5) with inflated cuffs.
Figure 2
Figure 3: Laryngeal tube in situ (cadaver of a pig weighing 40 kg).
Figure 4: Insertion of the deflated laryngeal tube.
Figure 5: Laryngeal mask in situ (cadaver of a pig weighing 40 kg).

References

  1. Wemyss-Holden, S.A., Porter, K.J., Baxter, P., Rudkin, G.E. & Maddern, G.J. The laryngeal mask airway in experimental pig anaesthesia. Lab. Anim. 33, 30–34 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fulkerson, P.J. & Gustafson, S.B. Use of laryngeal mask airway compared to endotracheal tube with positive-pressure ventilation in anesthetized swine. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 34, 284–288 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Leach, A.B. & Alexander, C.A. The laryngeal mask—an overview. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. Suppl. 4, 19–31 (1991).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Verghese, C. & Brimacombe, J.R. Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11,910 patients: safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage. Anesth. Analg. 82, 129–133 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brimacombe, J.R., Brain, A.I.J. & Berry, A.M. The Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Review and Practical Guide (W.B. Saunders, London, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bateman, L., Ludders, J.W., Gleed, R.D. & Erb, H.N. Comparison between facemask and laryngeal mask airway in rabbits during isoflurane anaesthesia. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 32, 280–288 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Braz, J.R., Martins, R. H, Mori, A.R. & Luna, S.P. Investigation into the use of the laryngeal mask airway in pentobarbital anesthetized dogs. Vet. Surg. 28, 502–505 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cruz, M.L., Sacchi, T., Luna, S.P. & Cassu, R.N. Use of a laryngeal mask for airway maintenance during inhalation anaesthesia in rabbits. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 27, 115–116 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brietzke, S.E. & Mair, E.A. Laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tube in a ferret model. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 110, 827–833 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Martins, R.H., Braz, J.R., Defaveri, J., Gregório, E.A. & Abud, T.M. Effect of high laryngeal mask airway intracuff pressure on the laryngopharyngeal mucosa of dogs. Laryngoscope 110, 645–650 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Price, H. Intubating rabbits. Vet. Rec. 160, 744 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, J.C. et al. Endotracheal tubes versus laryngeal mask airways in rabbit inhalation anesthesia: ease of use and waste gas emissions. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 43, 22–25 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wiederstein, I., Auer, U. & Moens, Y. Laryngeal mask airway insertion requires less propofol than endotracheal intubation in dogs. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 33, 201–206 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Patil, V.U., Fairbrother, C.R. & Dunham, B.M. Use of the laryngeal mask airway for emergency or elective airway management situations in pigs. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 36, 47–49 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goldmann, K., Kalinowski, M. & Kraft, S. Airway management under general anaesthesia in pigs using the LMA-ProSeal: a pilot study. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 32, 308–313 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldmann, K., Kalinowski, M., Dieterich, J. & Wulf, H. Use of the LMA-ProSeal in an experimental pig model—a potential animal model for laryngeal mask airway research: results of a pilot study. Anaesthesiol. Intensivmed. Notfallmed. Schmerzther. 41, 223–227 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Asai, T. & Shingu, K. The laryngeal tube. Br. J. Anaesth. 95, 729–736 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dörges, V., Ocker, H., Wenzel, V. & Schmucker, P. The laryngeal tube: a new simple airway device. Anesth. Analg. 90, 1220–1222 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Genzwuerker, H.V., Dhonau, S. & Ellinger, K. Use of the laryngeal tube for out-of-hospital resuscitation. Resuscitation 52, 221–224 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamamoto, Y., Inoue, S., Abe, R., Kawaguchi, M. & Furuya, H. Airway management with the laryngeal tube in rabbits. Lab Anim. (NY) 36, 33–35 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Krösche, J., Lippmann, B. & Puchstein, C. Airway management with a laryngeal tube used in a patient with sedation difficulties [article in German, English summary]. Der Notarzt 23 95–97 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Noor Zairul, M. & Khairul Faizi, A. Comparison of the VBM laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask airway for ventilation during manual in-line neck stabilisation. Singapore Med. J. 47, 892–896 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Asai, T., Murao, K. & Shingu, K. Efficacy of the laryngeal tube during intermittent positive-pressure ventilation. Anesthesia 55, 1099–1102 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Baik, H. J, Kim, J.H. & Lee, C.H. Laryngeal mask insertion during target-controlled infusion of propofol. J. Clin. Anaesth. 13, 175–181 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sundman, E. et al. Pharyngeal function and airway protection during subhypnotic concentrations of propofol, isoflurane, and sevoflurane: volunteers examined by pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry. Anesthesiology 95, 1125–1132 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torsten Birkholz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Birkholz, T., Irouschek, A., Kessler, P. et al. Feasibility of the laryngeal tube airway for artificial ventilation in pigs and comparison with the laryngeal mask airway. Lab Anim 37, 371–379 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0808-371

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0808-371

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing