Abstract
Airway management in anesthetized pigs is known to be technically demanding, and the 'gold standard' technique of endotracheal intubation is particularly difficult to master. The authors investigated the feasibility of the laryngeal tube as an alternative technique for airway management in German Landrace pigs (n = 5). They compared this method with the laryngeal mask, which is considered to be an effective yet relatively straightforward tool for porcine airway management. One after the other, investigators attempted to establish an airway in each anesthetized, artificially ventilated pig using each device. The laryngeal tube was too short to intubate the largest pig (weighing 45 kg), and it took investigators slightly longer to insert this device compared with the laryngeal mask. With the laryngeal mask, there were several incidents of gastric insufflation. Despite these complications, all investigators were able to establish a secure airway and maintain oxygenation with the laryngeal tube, and all subjectively rated both devices as easy to use.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
We are sorry, but there is no personal subscription option available for your country.
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Wemyss-Holden, S.A., Porter, K.J., Baxter, P., Rudkin, G.E. & Maddern, G.J. The laryngeal mask airway in experimental pig anaesthesia. Lab. Anim. 33, 30–34 (1999).
Fulkerson, P.J. & Gustafson, S.B. Use of laryngeal mask airway compared to endotracheal tube with positive-pressure ventilation in anesthetized swine. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 34, 284–288 (2007).
Leach, A.B. & Alexander, C.A. The laryngeal mask—an overview. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. Suppl. 4, 19–31 (1991).
Verghese, C. & Brimacombe, J.R. Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11,910 patients: safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage. Anesth. Analg. 82, 129–133 (1996).
Brimacombe, J.R., Brain, A.I.J. & Berry, A.M. The Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Review and Practical Guide (W.B. Saunders, London, 1997).
Bateman, L., Ludders, J.W., Gleed, R.D. & Erb, H.N. Comparison between facemask and laryngeal mask airway in rabbits during isoflurane anaesthesia. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 32, 280–288 (2005).
Braz, J.R., Martins, R. H, Mori, A.R. & Luna, S.P. Investigation into the use of the laryngeal mask airway in pentobarbital anesthetized dogs. Vet. Surg. 28, 502–505 (1999).
Cruz, M.L., Sacchi, T., Luna, S.P. & Cassu, R.N. Use of a laryngeal mask for airway maintenance during inhalation anaesthesia in rabbits. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 27, 115–116 (2000).
Brietzke, S.E. & Mair, E.A. Laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tube in a ferret model. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 110, 827–833 (2001).
Martins, R.H., Braz, J.R., Defaveri, J., Gregório, E.A. & Abud, T.M. Effect of high laryngeal mask airway intracuff pressure on the laryngopharyngeal mucosa of dogs. Laryngoscope 110, 645–650 (2000).
Price, H. Intubating rabbits. Vet. Rec. 160, 744 (2007).
Smith, J.C. et al. Endotracheal tubes versus laryngeal mask airways in rabbit inhalation anesthesia: ease of use and waste gas emissions. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 43, 22–25 (2004).
Wiederstein, I., Auer, U. & Moens, Y. Laryngeal mask airway insertion requires less propofol than endotracheal intubation in dogs. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 33, 201–206 (2006).
Patil, V.U., Fairbrother, C.R. & Dunham, B.M. Use of the laryngeal mask airway for emergency or elective airway management situations in pigs. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 36, 47–49 (1997).
Goldmann, K., Kalinowski, M. & Kraft, S. Airway management under general anaesthesia in pigs using the LMA-ProSeal: a pilot study. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 32, 308–313 (2005).
Goldmann, K., Kalinowski, M., Dieterich, J. & Wulf, H. Use of the LMA-ProSeal in an experimental pig model—a potential animal model for laryngeal mask airway research: results of a pilot study. Anaesthesiol. Intensivmed. Notfallmed. Schmerzther. 41, 223–227 (2006).
Asai, T. & Shingu, K. The laryngeal tube. Br. J. Anaesth. 95, 729–736 (2005).
Dörges, V., Ocker, H., Wenzel, V. & Schmucker, P. The laryngeal tube: a new simple airway device. Anesth. Analg. 90, 1220–1222 (2000).
Genzwuerker, H.V., Dhonau, S. & Ellinger, K. Use of the laryngeal tube for out-of-hospital resuscitation. Resuscitation 52, 221–224 (2002).
Yamamoto, Y., Inoue, S., Abe, R., Kawaguchi, M. & Furuya, H. Airway management with the laryngeal tube in rabbits. Lab Anim. (NY) 36, 33–35 (2007).
Krösche, J., Lippmann, B. & Puchstein, C. Airway management with a laryngeal tube used in a patient with sedation difficulties [article in German, English summary]. Der Notarzt 23 95–97 (2007).
Noor Zairul, M. & Khairul Faizi, A. Comparison of the VBM laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask airway for ventilation during manual in-line neck stabilisation. Singapore Med. J. 47, 892–896 (2006).
Asai, T., Murao, K. & Shingu, K. Efficacy of the laryngeal tube during intermittent positive-pressure ventilation. Anesthesia 55, 1099–1102 (2000).
Baik, H. J, Kim, J.H. & Lee, C.H. Laryngeal mask insertion during target-controlled infusion of propofol. J. Clin. Anaesth. 13, 175–181 (2001).
Sundman, E. et al. Pharyngeal function and airway protection during subhypnotic concentrations of propofol, isoflurane, and sevoflurane: volunteers examined by pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry. Anesthesiology 95, 1125–1132 (2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Birkholz, T., Irouschek, A., Kessler, P. et al. Feasibility of the laryngeal tube airway for artificial ventilation in pigs and comparison with the laryngeal mask airway. Lab Anim 37, 371–379 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0808-371
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0808-371