Clinical Nephrology – Epidemiology – Clinical Trials
Kidney International (2005) 67, 1471–1475; doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00224.x
Use of sirolimus and low-dose calcineurin inhibitor in lung transplant recipients with renal impairment: Results of a controlled pilot study
DAVID SHITRIT, RUTH RAHAMIMOV, SAHAR GIDON, ILANA BAKAL, ARIELLA BARGIL-SHITRIT, SAUTE MILTON and MORDECHAI R KRAMER
Pulmonary Institute; Department of Nephrology; and Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tiqwa; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv Univeristy, Tel Aviv, Israel; and Department of Internal Medicine, Shaare-Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
Correspondence: Prof M.R. Kramer, Pulmonary Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tiqwa, Israel 49100. E-mail:davids3@clalit.org.il
Received 8 February 2004; Revised 7 June 2004; Re-revised 29 July 2004; Re-revised 9 September 2004; Accepted 12 October 2004.
Abstract
Use of sirolimus and low-dose calcineurin inhibitor in lung transplant recipients with renal impairment: Results of a controlled pilot study.
Background
Renal failure induced by calcineurin-inhibitor agents is a common complication of lung transplantation. Sirolimus, a macrolide immunosuppressant with a distinct mechanism of action, may prevent renal failure but was found to have a high infectious and toxicity rate in the only relevant study conducted so far. The aim of the present prospective pilot study was to assess the benefit of sirolimus combined with low-dose calcineurin inhibitors in this patient population.
Methods
Sixteen lung transplant recipients with post-transplantation renal dysfunction were allocated to receive the standard immunosuppression regimen or a combination sirolimus/low-dose calcineurin-inhibitor regimen. Target trough levels of sirolimus were 4 to 8 ng/mL. Tacrolimus was tapered down to target trough levels of 4 to 8 ng/mL and cyclosporine to 80 to 120 ng/mL. Duration of follow-up was 18 months.
Results
At the end of follow-up, the sirolimus group showed a significant improvement in creatinine clearance (42.6 mL/min vs. 32.5 mL/min, P = 0.05), whereas the control group showed a significant reduction (32.3 mL/min vs. 40.3 mL/min, P = 0.02). The difference between the groups was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Acute rejection episodes occurred in 2 patients in the sirolimus group and 1 patient in the control group (P = NS). Pneumonia developed in 6 study patients and 4 controls; all responded to antibiotics.
Conclusion
Sirolimus combined with low-dose calcineurin inhibitors appears to be a safe and effective alternative immunosuppressive therapy to sirolimus alone in lung transplant recipients with renal failure. Graft function is preserved, and infection and drug toxicity rates are low.
Keywords:
sirolimus, renal function, lung transplantation, calcineurin- inhibitor, rejection
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
Posttransplant anemia: the role of sirolimus
Kidney International Review
Immunosuppression for heart transplantation: where are we now?
Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine Review (01 Apr 2006)
RESEARCH
Post-transplant nephrotic syndrome: A comprehensive clinicopathologic study
Kidney International Original Article
Kidney International Original Article
Kidney International Original Article


