In recent years, the number of patients developing end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has dramatically increased worldwide1. Slowing or stopping the progression to ESRD is the biggest challenge facing nephrologists today. Progressive accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) in glomeruli and interstitium characterizes chronic renal disease, regardless of the underlying etiology2,3. This points to a final common pathway for ESRD. Identification of key mediators of matrix accumulation and development of strategies to block the action of these mediators is now the focus of many investigators. Two of these key mediators are angiotensin II (Ang II) and transforming growth factor-
(TGF-
).
Blockade of Ang II significantly limits renal matrix expansion in numerous experimental models of acute and chronic renal disease4, indicating that Ang II is a central effector in the pathogenesis of renal fibrosis. Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II type I receptor antagonists (AT1RAs) have been remarkably successful in clinical trials5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12, their full therapeutic potential in humans may not have yet been realized because of inadequate dosing. Nonetheless, from work with animal models13 and the overall clinical experience, it appears unlikely that these drugs alone will entirely halt fibrosis at any dose. A promising and perhaps necessary approach to further disease reduction is combination of new antifibrotic therapies with inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system.
Of an increasing number of therapies showing efficacy in animal studies, neutralizing antibodies to TGF-
are the most thoroughly studied. From the first studies published in 1990 demonstrating TGF-
's fibrogenic effects14,15,16, overwhelming evidence now exists that sustained over-expression of TGF-
is a key mediator of fibrotic disease. Its fibrogenic actions include: (1) stimulation of matrix synthesis; (2) inhibition of matrix degradation; and (3) modulation of matrix receptor expression to facilitate cell-matrix interactions. Many strategies to block TGF-
have been used in animal studies. TGF-
antibodies, antisense oligonucleotides17,18, soluble TGF-
type II receptor19 or type III receptor20, the TGF-
inhibitor decorin21,22, TGF-
's latency-associated peptide23, the negative regulatory signaling molecule Smad724, and inhibition of TGF-
activation25 have all shown therapeutic efficacy. Among these strategies, TGF-
antibodies are the best developed and most thoroughly studied. Many in vivo studies have demonstrated their antifibrotic effects in renal fibrosis16,26,27,28,29,30, pulmonary fibrosis31, arterial restenosis32, and skin scarring and thickening33,34,35. Long-term TGF-
antibody treatment has so far been shown to be safe and to effectively prevent glomerulosclerosis in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes27. In addition, advances in antibody technology now make production of totally human antibodies a reality, enhancing their clinical utility as therapeutics. To date, however, there are no animal experiments designed to answer three important questions: how much disease reduction is possible with these antibodies; how does this disease reduction compare side-by-side with Ang II blockade alone; and can disease reduction be increased if maximally effective doses of both drugs are combined.
Here we used the model of acute glomerulonephritis induced by injection of an anti-Thy1 antibody to investigate the potential of different doses of the mouse anti–TGF-
1, -
2, and -
3 monoclonal antibody, 1D11, to reduce disease. We then compared the maximally effective dose of 1D11 with the previously determined maximally effective dose of the ACEI, enalapril. Finally, we determined whether combination of the antibody and enalapril at maximally therapeutic doses could further reduce disease.
METHODS
Materials
The anti–TGF-
antibody, 1D11, which neutralizes isoforms TGF-
1, -
2, and -
3, was kindly provided by Cambridge Antibody Technology (Granta Park; Cambridgeshire, UK) and Genzyme Corporation (Cambridge, MA, USA).
Unless otherwise indicated, materials, chemicals, or culture media were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Animals
The studies were performed on male Sprague Dawley rats (200 to 250 g) obtained from the Sasco colony of Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, USA). Animal housing and care were in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, NIH publication no. 85–23, 1985. Animals were fed a normal protein diet (22% protein, Teklad No. 86 550; Teklad Premier Laboratory Diets, Madison, WI, USA). Glomerulonephritis was induced by tail vein injection of 2.25 mg/kg of the monoclonal anti-Thy 1.1 antibody OX-7 (NCCC; Biovest International, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). OX-7 binds to a Thy 1-like epitope on the surface of mesangial cells, causing complement-dependent cell lysis followed by fibrotic tissue repair36. Control animals were injected with similar volumes of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
Experimental design
A pilot experiment was carried out to determine the effective dose range of 1D11 in anti-Thy 1 glomerulonephritis. Doses of 1D11 from 0.05 to 5 mg/kg were administered to 10 groups of 4 rats. Based on the results, a larger experiment was carried out.
Groups of 8 rats were assigned and treated as outlined in Table 1. We have previously published that doses of enalapril above 100 mg/mL in drinking water are maximally effective in this model13. A dose of 200 mg/mL enalapril was used here. Enalapril treatment began 24 hours after disease induction. At that time, based on an average water intake of 40 mL per day, 60% of the daily dose was administered by gavage as described previously13. The pilot results indicated that the dose response was in the range 0.01 to 5 mg/kg; 1D11 doses of 0.5 and 5.0 mg/kg maximally reduced ECM accumulation, so these were used in combination with enalapril in groups 8 and 9.
Six days after induction of glomerulonephritis the animals were anesthetized with isoflurane. Following a midline abdominal incision, 5 to 10 mL blood was drawn from the lower abdominal aorta, and kidneys were subsequently perfused with 30 mL ice-cold PBS. For histologic examination cortical tissue was snap frozen or fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. Glomeruli from individual rats were isolated by a graded sieving technique (150, 125, and 75
m mesh metal sieves) as described previously15, and resuspended at 5000 glomeruli/mL/well in RPMI supplemented with 0.1 U/mL insulin, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100
g/mL streptomycin, and 25 mmol/L HEPES buffer. After a 48-hour incubation at 37°C/5% CO2 the supernatant was harvested and stored at -70°C until analysis of glomerular production of fibronectin (FN), PAI-1, and TGF-
1.
Measurement of FN, PAI-1, and TGF-
1
FN and PAI-1 synthesis were measured with modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to published methods37. TGF-
1 production of cultured glomeruli was measured after acid-activation using a commercially available ELISA kit (DuoSet®; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Three samples from each rat were analyzed.
Light microscopy
All microscopic examinations were performed in a blinded fashion. Three
m sections of paraffin-embedded tissue were stained with periodic-acid Schiff (PAS), and glomerular matrix expansion was evaluated as previously described15. Briefly, in 30 glomeruli from each rat, the percentage of mesangial matrix occupying each glomerulus was rated as 0 = 0%, 1 = 25%, 2 = 50%, 3 = 75%, and 4 = 100%.
Immunofluorescent staining
Goat antihuman collagen I antibody was obtained from Southern Biotechnology Associates, Inc. (Birmingham, AL, USA). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated rabbit antigoat immunoglobulin G (IgG; Dako Corporation, Carpinteria, CA, USA) was used as secondary antibody. Monoclonal mouse anticellular FN EDA+ was obtained from Harlan Sera-Lab, Ltd. (Loughborough, England). FITC-rat F(ab')2 antimouse IgG(H+L) was used as secondary antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA, USA). FITC-conjugated mouse antirat monocyte/macrophage antibody (ED1) was obtained from Serotec (Oxford, UK).
Renal tissue was snap frozen in 2-methylbutane that had been precooled at -80°C. Four-
m sections were obtained using a cryostat (Leica CM 1800; E Licht Company, Denver, CO, USA). Tissues were air dried and fixed in alcohol, washed in PBS, pH 7.4, incubated with the primary antibodies, washed with PBS, incubated with the appropriate FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies, washed again, and mounted with cover glasses using Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Inc.).
The intensity of glomerular staining of collagen I and FN was evaluated according to a 0 to 4 scale, which has been described in detail previously38. The number of cells per glomerulus staining positive for the monocyte/macrophage marker ED1 were counted. Thirty glomeruli per sample were evaluated. The mean values with standard error values were calculated.
RNA preparation and Northern hybridization
Total RNA was extracted by a guanidinium isothiocyanate method using Trizol® Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA from 8 rats of each group was pooled for further examination. For Northern analysis, RNA was denatured and fractionated by electrophoresis through a 1.0% agarose gel (30
g/lane) and transferred to a nylon membrane (BrightStar™-Plus; Ambion, Inc., Austin, TX, USA). Nucleic acids were immobilized by ultraviolet irradiation (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). Membranes were prehybridized with ULTRAhyb™ buffer (Ambion, Inc.), and hybridized with DNA probes labeled with 32P-dATP by random oligonucleotide priming (Strip-EZ DNA™; Ambion, Inc.). The blots were washed in 2
standard saline citrate (SSC), 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at room temperature for 10 minutes and in 0.1
SSC, 0.1% SDS at 42°C for 15 minutes 2 times. DNA probes used were: (1) mouse 18S (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA); (2) rat procollagen
1 cDNA (kindly provided by Dr. D. Rowe)39; (3) FN-EDA cDNA (kindly provided by Dr. R.O. Hynes)40; (4) PAI-1 cDNA (kindly provided by Dr. T.D. Gelehrter)41; and (5) TGF-
1 cDNA (kindly provided by Dr. H. Moses)42. Three blots were performed for each probe. Autoradiographic signals obtained with 18S cDNA probe served as controls for equal loading of the gel. Autoradiographs were scanned on a Bio-Rad GS-700 imaging densitometer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Changes in mRNA levels were determined by first correcting for the densitometric intensity of 18S for each sample. For comparison, this ratio was set at unity for normal control samples, and other lanes on the same gel were expressed as fold increases over this value.
Western blot
Glomeruli from individual rats were isolated and resuspended at 2
104 glomeruli/mL in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (50 mmol/L Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and 1 tablet/5 mL protease inhibitor mix [Complete, mini; Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN, USA], 50
L/5 mL phosphatase inhibitor cocktail II (Sigma). Glomeruli were homogenized 2 times on ice by sonication. Each 15-second sonication was followed by a 15-second cool down. After 2 centrifugations at 10,000g for 10 minutes at 4°C, the supernatant was stored at -70°C until analysis. Forty
L of each supernatant was separated by 10% Tris-glycine gel electrophoresis and transferred to a 0.45-
m nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Nonspecific binding was blocked by 10% nonfat milk powder in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) for 1 hour at room temperature, followed by 4°C overnight incubation with primary antibody [anti–phospho-Smad2; Upstate, Lake Placid, NY, USA, diluted 1:500 in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in TBS/0.1% Tween-20 with 0.02% NaN3; or anti–
-actin, diluted 1:10,000 (Sigma)]. The blot was washed 3 times for 10 minutes in TBS/0.1% Tween-20. The second antibody, goat antirabbit horseradish peroxidase or goat antimouse horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA), was incubated at a dilution of 1:2000 for an additional hour at room temperature, followed by 3 washes as described above. Bound antibodies were detected by developing the blot in enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL)™ Western blotting detection reagents (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK) for 1 minute. Quantitation of the bands on autoradiograms was performed using a Bio-Rad GS-700 imaging densitometer. Changes in p-Smad2 levels were determined by correcting for the densitometric intensity of
-actin for each sample.
Statistical analysis and calculation of percent reduction in disease severity
Data are expressed as mean
SEM. Statistical analysis of differences between the groups was performed either by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and subsequent Student-Newman–Keuls or Dunnett testing for multiple comparison, or, in the case of PAS scoring, collagen I and FN immunofluoresence staining, differences between the groups were tested using analysis of ranks by Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's post analysis. Mean or median values were considered significantly different when P < 0.05.
The disease-induced increase in a variable was defined as the mean value for the disease control group minus the mean value of the normal control group. The percent reduction in disease severity in a treated group was calculated as:

RESULTS
Three questions were asked in these experiments. First, is 1D11 effective in this model of nephritis and can we determine the maximally effective dose of 1D11? Second, how does this dose compare with effects seen with maximal doses of enalapril? And third, can we see additivity of enalapril and 1D11 when both are administered at maximally effective doses?
Effect of 1D11
The induction of disease by the administration of OX-7 produced a rapid accumulation of extracellular matrix in glomeruli as measured by PAS staining. Representative glomeruli from this study are shown in Figure 1. The disease-induced increase in ECM is seen when Figure 1a (normal control) and Figure 1b (disease control) are compared. Increasing doses of 1D11 (0.05 mg/kg to 5.0 mg/kg), shown in Figure 1c to f, reveal a clear decrease in PAS-positive material with increasing doses of 1D11. To quantify this histologic effect of 1D11 on the accumulation of ECM, 30 glomeruli per animal were scored for PAS staining, scores were averaged for each animal, and then for each group. This analysis, presented graphically in Figure 2a, indicates that 1D11 produced a dose-dependent reduction in PAS staining. A moderate but significant (P < 0.05) decrease of approximately 56% was seen for PAS staining in rats treated with 0.5 mg/kg 1D11 compared to disease control animals.
Figure 1.
Effect of increasing doses of 1D11, enalapril, and combinations of 1D11 and enalapril on the development of glomerulosclerosis. Paraffin sections. Magnification,
400. Compared with normal rats (A), glomerular enlargement and significant mesangial matrix deposition were evident in untreated, disease control (B). These changes were ameliorated by doses of 1D11 0.01 (C), 0.1 (D), 0.5 (E), 5.0 (F) mg/kg, and enalapril (G). The best therapeutic effects were achieved by combination therapies Enal+0.5 (H) and Enal+5 (I).
Figure 2.
Effect of increasing doses of 1D11, enalapril, and combinations of 1D11 and enalapril on matrix score (A), and immunohistochemical staining for fibronectin EDA+ (B) and collagen I (C).#P < 0.001 disease control (DC) compared to normal control (NC) group; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 treatment groups compared to DC group.
Full figure and legend (38K)In order to determine the contribution of specific matrix proteins to the PAS-positive material immunofluorescent staining for specific glomerular proteins was performed. Representative glomeruli stained for FN EDA+ and type I collagen are shown in Figures 3 and 4. Again, a dramatic increase in staining for matrix proteins was seen in disease control animals Figures 3b and 4b (up to 13-fold for collagen and 3.6-fold for FN) compared to normal control animals Figures 3a and 4a. Treatment with 1D11 produced dose-dependent decreases in the accumulation of FN EDA+ and collagen I in glomeruli which are clearly seen when disease control glomeruli Figures 3b and 4b are compared with increasing doses of 1D11 as shown in Figures 3c to f and 4c to f. As with PAS scores, all staining scores were averaged and are presented graphically in Figures 2b and 2c. Doses of 0.5 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg 1D11 reduced both FN EDA+ and collagen I deposition between 32% and 36%, respectively; however, these changes were not significant.
Figure 3.
Immunofluorescence micrographs of fibronectin EDA+. Magnification,
400. A weak immunoreactivity was observed in normal glomeruli (A). Remarkably strong intraglomerular staining of fibronectin was found in untreated rats (B). Fibronectin accumulation was ameliorated by 1D11 treatment 0.01 (C), 0.1 (D), 0.5 (E), 5 (F) mg/kg, and enalapril (G). The best therapeutic effects were achieved by combination therapies Enal+0.5 (H) and Enal+5 (I).
Figure 4.
Immunofluorescence micrographs of type I collagen. Magnification,
400. Tubular basement membrane and Bowman's capsule were positively stained with collagen I antibody. Nearly no immunoreactivity was seen in normal glomeruli (A). Remarkably strong intraglomerular staining of collagen I was found in untreated disease control rats (B). Collagen I accumulation was ameliorated to different extents by 1D11 treatments 0.01 (C), 0.1 (D), 0.5 (E), 5 mg/kg (F), and enalapril (G). The best therapeutic effects were achieved by combination therapies Enal+0.5 (H) and Enal+5 (I).
Glomerular synthesis of proteins of interest was determined by ELISA on culture supernatants from isolated glomeruli cultured for 48 hours. Again, as shown in Figure 5, 1D11 treatment caused a dose-related reduction of these markers of disease. At a 1D11 dose of 5 mg/kg, FN, PAI-1, and TGF-
1 levels were reduced by 54%, 115%, and 67%, respectively (P < 0.05).
Figure 5.
Effect of increasing doses of 1D11, enalapril, and combinations of 1D11 and enalapril on glomerular production of fibronectin (A), PAI-1 (B), and TGF-
1 (C).*P < 0.05 compared to normal control (NC) group; #P < 0.05 compared to disease control (DC) group; **P < 0.05 compared to enalapril alone; ##P < 0.05 compared to the corresponding dose of antibody alone.
Glomerular mRNA expression of FN EDA+, collagen I, PAI-1, and TGF-
1 is shown in Figures 6 and 7. Blots for one gel are shown in Figure 6. The mean
SE of densitometry values obtained from scans of 3 gels are shown graphically in Figure 7. 1D11 treatment reduced gene expression of FN EDA+ and PAI-1, collagen I, and TGF-
1 mRNA in a dose-dependent manner. However, the maximal effect for the inhibition of FN EDA+, collagen I, and TGF-
1 expression was achieved at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg, with 5 mg/kg appearing to be less effective. 1D11 maximally reduced FN EDA+ expression by 63%, PAI-1 by 58%, collagen I by 96%, and TGF-
1 by 48% (Figure 7a to d, respectively).
Figure 6.
A representative Northern blot showing glomerular mRNA expression of TGF-
1, PAI-1, collagen I, and fibronectin harvested six days after induction of glomerulonephritis.
Figure 7.
Effect of increasing doses of 1D11, enalapril, and combinations of 1D11 and enalapril on glomerular mRNA levels for fibronectin (A), PAI-1 (B), collagen I (C), and TGF-
1 (D). Data presented are the means of densitometric scans of three Northern blots using pooled mRNA from each group of rats. *P < 0.05 compared to normal control (NC) group; #P < 0.05 compared to disease control (DC) group; **P < 0.05 compared to enalapril alone; ##P < 0.05 compared to the corresponding dose of antibody alone.
Treatment with 1D11 also reduced proteinuria in a dose-dependent manner. 1D11 at 5 mg/kg maximally reduced proteinuria, giving mean urinary proteins of 17.7
2.3 mg/24h, compared to the disease control group (35.1
8.5 mg/24h). However, for this readout, the control antibody 13C4 mouse IgG1 (5 mg/kg) also reduced proteinuria to 10.2
0.9mg/24h. Hence, it is difficult to interpret the effect of 1D11 on this variable. The control antibody, 13C4, had no significant effect on any other measure of disease (compared to the disease control, data not shown).
Comparison of the effect of 1D11 and enalapril
From data presented above, it is clear that either 0.5 or 5.0 mg/kg 1D11 show maximal therapeutic effects in this model. Also, from our previous dose-response study with enalapril13, we know that enalapril, at doses greater than 100 mg/L in drinking water, produces the maximally obtainable therapeutic response in this model. Thus, 200 mg/L enalapril alone or in combination with 0.5 or 5 mg/kg 1D11 was used to determine the effect of combining these 2 treatments.
The 0.5 mg/kg dose of 1D11 reduced matrix score by 56%, whereas enalapril alone reduced it by 59% Figure 1e, g, and 2a. This similarity in disease reduction was seen for most measures of disease. Enalapril or maximally effective 1D11 (either 0.5 mg/kg or 5 mg/kg) reduced FN immunostaining by 36% and 36% (Figures 2b, 3e, and g), collagen I immunostaining by 33% and 34% (Figures 2c, 4e, and g), and FN production by 53% and 54%, respectively Figure 5a.
In contrast, the therapeutic effect of 1D11 on PAI-1 production by cultured glomeruli Figure 5b and on PAI-1 mRNA Figures 6 and 7b appears to be somewhat greater than that seen for enalapril, although statistical tests did not reach significance for comparisons between these groups. Similarly, the mRNA analysis suggested that 1D11 was much more effective in reducing collagen I mRNA than was enalapril (P < 0.05; Figures 6 and 7c).
Combination of 1D11 and enalapril
It is clear from the data that combining maximally effective doses of enalapril and 1D11 confers additional therapeutic benefits compared to either drug given alone. Combination of enalapril with 1D11 reduced glomerular matrix accumulation, as measured by PAS staining, from approximately 59% enalapril alone or 1D11 alone to 80% for enalapril plus 5.0 mg/kg 1D11 (P < 0.001 compared to disease control animals) Figures 1e to i and 2a. The enhanced therapeutic effect of combined treatment with both agents was also seen for FN Figures 2b and 3 and collagen I Figures 2c and 4 immunostaining, as well as glomerular production of FN and PAI-1 Figure 5a and b. Addition of 1D11 (0.5 mg/kg) to enalapril further reduced FN production by 25% to a total inhibition of 77%. In terms of proteinuria, monotherapy reduced disease-induced increases in urinary protein by 78%, 74%, and 62% for enalapril, 0.5 1D11, and 5 1D11, respectively. Combination treatment further reduced proteinuria to 98% and 99% for 0.5 and 5.0 mg/kg 1D11, respectively, values that did not differ from normal. Combination treatment had no further effect on PAI-1 production. However, this variable was reduced to levels lower than those of the normal control group, as with 1D11 alone Figure 5b. In contrast, as shown in Figure 5c, the treatment-related reduction in TGF-
1 production by cultured glomeruli was similar across all treatment groups, indicating no additive effects of combination on this readout.
The results obtained for glomerular mRNA levels for FN, collagen I, TGF-
1, and PAI-1 produced a more mixed picture than other variables, and one that did not entirely agree with the results of protein production by cultured glomeruli Figures 6 and 7. FN mRNA levels were similarly reduced whether enalapril or 1D11 were used alone and the maximum inhibition of FN mRNA was achieved with 0.5 mg/kg 1D11, with 5 mg/kg being less effective. However, the combination of enalapril with 1D11 5 mg/kg appeared to reverse this apparent reduction in efficacy of 1D11 restoring the inhibition of FN mRNA production Figure 7a. Interestingly, while the therapeutic effect of enalapril or 1D11 alone resulted in very similar reductions in PAI-1 mRNA, combination of these 2 drugs appeared to have reversed the effect for PAI-1 message Figure 7b. Compared to the protein levels measured in the supernatant, the data suggest that the increase in PAI-1 mRNA was not translated into PAI-1 protein production and secretion into culture supernatant. Collagen I mRNA was reduced to control levels by 1D11 treatment alone at both 0.5 and 5 mg/kg; therefore, it is not surprising that combination of 1D11 and enalapril had no further effect Figure 7c. Finally, the picture for TGF-
1 mRNA levels is also somewhat mixed Figure 7d. While enalapril or 0.5 mg/kg 1D11 reduced TGF-
1 mRNA by 29% and 48%, respectively, high-dose antibody or combinations entirely reversed this effect, bringing levels essentially to those of the disease control group Figure 7d. As with PAI-1 mRNA, this finding was seen only for TGF-
1 mRNA, and not for TGF-
1 secreted into culture supernatant by glomeruli. The significance of these mRNA data is therefore not fully supportive of the observed protein changes. The reason for this is unknown.
Studies into possible mechanisms of the additivity of enalapril and 1D11
Infiltration of macrophages into injured glomeruli is thought to contribute to disease in anti-Thy1 nephritis43. The results of staining for ED1+ cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage are shown in Figure 8. At the 3 low doses of antibody a clear dose-response is seen, with the number of ED1+ cells being significantly (P < 0.05) reduced by 71% with the 0.5 mg/kg dose of 1D11. However, at the highest dose of 1D11, 5 mg/kg was less effective, such that the reduction was only 23% Figure 8. Enalapril alone also significantly (P < 0.05) reduced ED1+ cells by 62%. Interestingly, as with FN mRNA, combination of both drugs appeared to prevent the rebound seen with high-dose 1D11 and the reduction in ED1+ cells was sustained at 70% and 69% in the two combination groups Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Effect of increasing doses of 1D11, enalapril, and combinations of 1D11 and enalapril on immunofluorescent staining for the monocyte/macrophage marker ED1.*P < 0.05 compared to normal control (NC) group; #P < 0.05 compared to disease control (DC) group; ##P < 0.05 compared to the corresponding dose of antibody alone.
Full figure and legend (24K)To study intracellular TGF-
signal transduction, we analyzed activation of Smad2 using an antibody specifically detecting phosphorylated Smad2 Figure 9. Diseased glomeruli have dramatically increased intracellular p-Smad2 compared to normal control. 1D11 dose-dependently reduced Smad2 activation, with the maximal reduction of 75% at the highest dose. Enalapril also reduced Smad2 activation by 36%. Adding enalapril to 1D11 resulted in a further reduction. 5 mg/kg 1D11 plus enalapril nearly normalized p-Smad2 levels.
Figure 9.
Effect of increasing doses of 1D11, enalapril, and combinations of 1D11 and enalapril on glomerular p-Smad2 protein as determined by Western blotting.
Full figure and legend (29K)DISCUSSION
The data presented here show that increasing doses of the TGF-
1, -
2, and -
3 neutralizing antibody 1D11 results in increasing therapeutic efficacy. In this model of acute renal fibrosis, a dose-dependent reduction of fibrotic disease is observed until the maximal effect at 0.5 mg/kg 1D11, after which efficacy appears to plateau. Since some of the measures we employed to assess efficacy were actually less effectively blocked in the group receiving 5.0 mg/kg 1D11, it is likely that the true maximally therapeutic dose is between 0.5 and 5.0 mg/kg. The data suggest that the maximal disease reduction possible with 1D11 is close to 50%, and that the disease reduction of 1D11 given alone is comparable to enalapril given alone.
We have shown that a combination of TGF-
inhibition with Ang II blockade resulted in an enhanced disease reduction. Thus, the combination of Ang II blockade and TGF-
inhibition could represent a major step forward in efforts to halt disease in humans. While we have previously shown additivity in anti-Thy1 nephritis with L-arginine supplementation and low protein diet, and also with angiotensin blockade and low protein diet44,45, both the degree of additivity and the feasibility of the combination of Ang II blockade and TGF-
inhibition are clearly superior to the previously used combinations.
A series of studies in the anti-Thy 1 model have shown that monotherapy with enalapril, losartan, 1%L-arginine in drinking water, or 6% low protein diet all reduced markers of fibrotic disease about 50%11,43. In the present study we add the neutralizing antibody to TGF-
1, -
2, and -
3, 1D11, to this list. This is a particularly important addition because, of the many molecules involved in fibrosis, none has been so consistently or thoroughly implicated as over-expression of TGF-
. Here, even with the potent anti–TGF-
neutralizing antibody 1D11, we see only a maximum 50% reduction in disease severity. The fact that no single treatment is able to prevent fibrotic disease suggests that either different pathways are mediating disease, or that the therapy itself stimulates back-up mechanisms to operate. Interestingly, the severity of fibrosis in the rat model of unilateral ureteral obstruction was also decreased about 50% in animals where both angiotensinogen genes were disrupted46. On the other hand, treatment with a TGF-
–neutralizing antibody (not 1D11) in a type II diabetic mouse model (db/db) for 8 weeks reduced glomerulosclerosis by 82% compared to normal littermates, suggesting that the maximal effectiveness of antibodies may differ with disease model27.
It should be noted that a number of studies have shown additivity of suboptimal doses of various treatments including ACEI and AT1RA45,47,48,49,50. While combinations of suboptimal doses of two drugs may be clinically useful to reduce side effects of high doses of one drug, true additivity, or synergism, can only be shown when maximally effective doses of at least 1 of 2 drugs are given. This is the first demonstration of true additivity of ACE inhibition and TGF-
antibodies. The ability of 1D11 and enalapril to show additivity when given at maximally therapeutic doses suggests that these drugs act, at least in part, through different pathways. This is in contrast to results when enalapril and losartan were combined, and no additivity was seen13, suggesting that these drugs work though a common pathway.
Inconsistent results in studies such as this are seen with respect to reductions in either TGF-
mRNA and/or TGF-
protein. While it might be expected that an association between disease severity and TGF-
expression would be seen, there are a number of studies where this was not seen. Here, we did not see a reduction in TGF-
mRNA with enalapril treatment, although we did in an earlier study13. Similarly, Benigni et al50, using lisinopril and 1D11, did not see significant reductions in glomerular mRNA. Other studies with Ang II blockade and/or TGF-
antibody therapy have seen significant reductions in TGF-
mRNA26,30,51. One explanation for these inconsistencies is the necessity of pooling samples to obtain adequate RNA for Northern blots, resulting in reduced power to detect differences. It is clear, however, that whether TGF-
over-expression is reduced or not, expression of downstream fibrogenic molecules, such as collagen I and FN, is generally significantly reduced.
To help clarify the mixed picture of TGF-
expression in this and other studies, we looked further into TGF-
signal transduction system. Using p-Smad2 as an activation marker, we found 1D11 dose-dependently reduced TGF-
signal transduction, and so did maximally effective doses of enalapril. Combination therapy resulted in further reduction of p-Smad2 compared to monotherapy. This result is consistent with the reductions seen for other measures of disease severity. It is probable that the enalapril effect on Smad activation is due to blocking Ang II–induced up-regulation of TGF-
or TGF-
receptor expression52,53,54,55.
An interesting finding in the study presented here is that the 1D11 dose response is modulated by the addition of enalapril. Reversal of the therapeutic effect of 1D11 on matrix score Figure 2a, FN mRNA Figure 7a, collagen I mRNA Figure 7c, and TGF-
1 mRNA Figure 7d was seen at the highest dose of 1D11 (5.0 mg/kg). While this reversal was often marginal for all but FN, the results do hint that more complete inhibition of TGF-
may be less effective at treating disease. This is most clearly seen in Figure 8, where the highest dose of 1D11, 5 mg/kg, is less effective at reducing ED1+ cell influx than a lower dose of this agent. Interestingly, a similar effect on monocyte/macrophage cells with the 5.0 mg/kg dose of 1D11 was recently reported in the puromycin nephropathy model [abstract; Ma LJ et al, J Am Soc Nephrol 12:2001:819A]. In the present study, the therapeutic effect was also reduced with this dose of 1D11. Both Ang II and TGF-
play important roles in recruitment of activated macrophages to the site of injury. These activated macrophages are thought to release chemotactic and profibrotic factors. TGF-
, however, has dual effects on macrophages. It strongly attracts macrophages and at the same time inhibits activated macrophage function by reducing the production and release of other chemotactic and inflammatory factors56,57,58. It is possible that increasing doses of 1D11 decrease macrophage infiltration initially, but as more TGF-
is neutralized, escape from TGF-
inhibition may lead to release of agents that further recruit macrophages. While the reduction of effect at higher doses of 1D11 and the possible role of macrophages in this observation requires further study, it is very interesting that combination of high-dose 1D11 with enalapril appears to reverse this tendency to rebound for all variables, except for TGF-
1 mRNA. This supports the notion that combination of Ang II blockade with TGF-
antibodies will not only provide greater therapeutic benefit than currently available therapies, but that any potential negative consequences may be ameliorated by this drug combination.
Finally, it is noteworthy that TGF-
antibody treatment did not cause any noticeable side effects. This is not surprising since this short-term experiment lasted only 6 days. Other long-term studies with TGF-
antibody, including 4 publications with the mouse monoclonal antibody, 1D11 used here27,28,30,50,51,59, reported no safety problems with this therapy.
CONCLUSION
The study presented here demonstrates a clear dose-dependent therapeutic response for the TGF-
1, -
2, and -
3 neutralizing antibody, 1D11. The maximal therapeutic effect of monotherapy is close to 50% disease reduction, whether the therapy is Ang II blockade or TGF-
inhibition. Finally, and most importantly, the data show an additional reduction in disease severity when maximally effective doses of enalapril are combined with TGF-
antibody, a finding that may stimulate human trials of such combinations and eventually better therapy for human fibrotic kidney disease.
References
| 1. | SCHENA FP. Epidemiology of end-stage renal disease: International comparisons of renal replacement therapy. Kidney Int 2000; 57: 39–45 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.07407.x. |
| 2. | KLAHR S, SCHREINER G & ICHIKAWA I. The progression of renal disease. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1657–1666. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 3. | BORDER WA & NOBLE NA. Transforming growth factor beta in tissue fibrosis. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1286–1292. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 4. | TAAL MW & BRENNER BM. Renoprotective benefits of RAS inhibition: From ACEI to angiotensin II antagonists. Kidney Int 2000; 57: 1803–1817 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00031.x. | PubMed | |
| 5. | LEWIS EJ, HUNSICKER LG & BAIN RP. et al The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. The Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1456–1462 10.1056/NEJM199311113292004. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 6. | Captopril reduces the risk of nephropathy in IDDM patients with microalbuminuria. The Microalbuminuria Captopril Study Group. Diabetologia 1996; 39: 587–593 10.1007/s001250050482. | ISI | |
| 7. | YUSUF S, SLEIGHT P & POGUE J. et al Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 145–153 10.1056/NEJM200001203420301. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 8. | MASCHIO G, ALBERTI D & JANIN G. et al Effect of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor benazepril on the progression of chronic renal insufficiency. The Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibition in Progressive Renal Insufficiency Study Group. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 939–945 10.1056/NEJM199604113341502. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 9. | Randomised placebo-controlled trial of effect of ramipril on decline in glomerular filtration rate and risk of terminal renal failure in proteinuric, non-diabetic nephropathy. The GISEN Group (Gruppo Italiano di Studi Epidemiologici in Nefrologia). Lancet 1997; 349: 1857–1863 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)11445-8. | ISI | |
| 10. | RAVID M, SAVIN H & JUTRIN I. et al Long-term stabilizing effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on plasma creatinine and on proteinuria in normotensive type II diabetic patients. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 577–581. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 11. | LEWIS EJ, HUNSICKER LG & CLARKE WR. et al Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 851–860 10.1056/NEJMoa011303. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 12. | BRENNER BM, COOPER ME & DE ZEEUW D. et al Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 861–869. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 13. | PETERS H, BORDER WA & NOBLE NA. Targeting TGF-beta overexpression in renal disease: Maximizing the antifibrotic action of angiotensin II blockade. Kidney Int 1998; 54: 1570–1580 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00164.x. | PubMed | |
| 14. | BORDER WA, OKUDA S & LANGUINO LR. et al Transforming growth factor-beta regulates production of proteoglycans by mesangial cells. Kidney Int 1990; 37: 689–695. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 15. | OKUDA S, LANGUINO LR & RUOSLAHTI E. et al Elevated expression of transforming growth factor- and proteoglycan production in experimental glomerulonephritis. J Clin Invest 1990; 86: 453–462. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 16. | BORDER WA, OKUDA S & LANGUINO LR. et al Suppression of experimental glomerulonephritis by antiserum against transforming growth factor beta 1. Nature 1990; 346: 371–374. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 17. | ISAKA Y, TSUJIE M & ANDO Y. et al Transforming growth factor-beta 1 antisense oligodeoxynucleotides block interstitial fibrosis in unilateral ureteral obstruction. Kidney Int 2000; 58: 1885–1892. | PubMed | |
| 18. | HAN DC, HOFFMAN BB & HONG SW. et al Therapy with antisense TGF-beta1 oligodeoxynucleotides reduces kidney weight and matrix mRNAs in diabetic mice. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2000; 278: F628–634. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 19. | ISAKA Y, AKAGI Y & ANDO Y. et al Gene therapy by transforming growth factor-beta receptor-IgG Fc chimera suppressed extracellular matrix accumulation in experimental glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 1999; 55: 465–475 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00275.x. | PubMed | |
| 20. | VILCHIS-LANDEROS MM, MONTIEL JL & MENDOZA V. et al Recombinant soluble betaglycan is a potent and isoform-selective transforming growth factor-beta neutralizing agent. Biochem J 2001; 355: 215–222 10.1042/0264-6021:3550215. | Article | PubMed | |
| 21. | BORDER WA, NOBLE NA & YAMAMOTO T. et al Natural inhibitor of transforming growth factor-beta protects against scarring in experimental kidney disease. Nature 1992; 360: 361–364. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 22. | ISAKA Y, BREES DK & IKEGAYA K. et al Gene therapy by skeletal muscle expression of decorin prevents fibrotic disease in rat kidney. Nature Med 1996; 2: 418–423 10.1038/nm0496-418. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 23. | BOTTINGER EP, FACTOR VM & TSANG ML. et al The recombinant proregion of transforming growth factor beta1 (latency-associated peptide) inhibits active transforming growth factor beta1 in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 5877–5882. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 24. | KANAMARU Y, NAKAO A & MAMURA M. et al Blockade of TGF-beta signaling in T cells prevents the development of experimental glomerulonephritis. J Immunol 2001; 166: 2818–2823. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 25. | YEVDOKIMOVA N, WAHAB NA & MASON RM. Thrombospondin-1 is the key activator of TGF-beta1 in human mesangial cells exposed to high glucose. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 703–712. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 26. | SHARMA K, JIN Y & GUO J. et al Neutralization of TGF-beta by anti-TGF-beta antibody attenuates kidney hypertrophy and the enhanced extracellular matrix gene expression in STZ-induced diabetic mice. Diabetes 1996; 45: 522–530. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 27. | ZIYADEH FN, HOFFMAN BB & HAN DC. et al Long-term prevention of renal insufficiency, excess matrix gene expression, and glomerular mesangial matrix expansion by treatment with monoclonal antitransforming growth factor-beta antibody in db/db diabetic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 8015–8020 10.1073/pnas.120055097. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort | |
| 28. | MIYAJIMA A, CHEN J & LAWRENCE C. et al Antibody to transforming growth factor-beta ameliorates tubular apoptosis in unilateral ureteral obstruction. Kidney Int 2000; 58: 2301–2313 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00414.x. | PubMed | |
| 29. | HILL C, FLYVBJERG A & RASCH R. et al Transforming growth factor-beta2 antibody attenuates fibrosis in the experimental diabetic rat kidney. J Endocrinol 2001; 170: 647–651. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 30. | DAHLY AJ, HOAGLAND KM & FLASCH AK. et al Antihypertensive effects of chronic anti-TGF-beta antibody therapy in Dahl S rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2002; 283: R757–767. | PubMed | |
| 31. | GIRI SN, HYDE DM & HOLLINGER MA. Effect of antibody to transforming growth factor beta on bleomycin induced accumulation of lung collagen in mice. Thorax 1993; 48: 959–966. | PubMed | |
| 32. | WOLF YG, RASMUSSEN LM & RUOSLAHTI E. Antibodies against transforming growth factor- 1 suppress intimal hyperplasia in a rat model. J Clin Invest 1994; 93: 1172–1178. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 33. | SHAH M, FOREMAN DM & FERGUSON MWJ. Control of scarring in adult wounds by neutralising antibody to transforming growth factor . Lancet 1992; 339: 213–214 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90009-R. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 34. | YAMAMOTO T, TAKAGAWA S & KATAYAMA I. et al Anti-sclerotic effect of transforming growth factor-beta antibody in a mouse model of bleomycin-induced scleroderma. Clin Immunol 1999; 92: 6–13 10.1006/clim.1999.4720. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 35. | BOWES LE, JIMENEZ MC & HIESTER ED. et al Collagen fiber orientation as quantified by small angle light scattering in wounds treated with transforming growth factor-beta2 and its neutalizing antibody. Wound Repair Regen 1999; 7: 179–186. | PubMed | |
| 36. | BAGCHUS WM, HOEDEMAEKER PJ & ROZING J. et al Glomerulonephritis induced by monoclonal anti-Thy 1.1 antibodies. A sequential histological and ultrastructural study in the rat. Lab Invest 1986; 55: 680–687. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 37. | RENNARD SI, BERG R & MARTIN GR. et al Enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) for connective tissue components. Anal Biochem 1980; 104: 205–214. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 38. | YAMAMOTO T, NOBLE NA & COHEN AH. et al Expression of transforming growth factor- isoforms in human glomerular diseases. Kidney Int 1996; 49: 461–469. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 39. | GENOVESE C, ROWE D & KREAM B. Construction of DNA sequences complementary to rat alpha 1 and alpha 2 collagen mRNA and their use in studying the regulation of type I collagen synthesis by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. Biochem 1984; 23: 6210–6216. | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 40. | SCHWARZBAUER JE, TAMKUN JW & LEMISCHKA IR. et al Three different fibronectin mRNAs arise by alternative splicing within the coding region. Cell 1983; 35: 421–431. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 41. | ZEHEB R & GELEHRTER TD. Cloning and sequencing of cDNA for the rat plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Gene 1988; 73: 459–468 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90510-0. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 42. | DERYNCK R, JARRETT JA & CHEN EY. et al The murine transforming growth factor-beta precursor. J Biol Chem 1986; 261: 4377–4379. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 43. | WESTERHUIS R, VAN STRAATEN SC & VAN DIXHOORN MG. et al Distinctive roles of neutrophils and monocytes in anti-thy-1 nephritis. Am J Path 2000; 156: 303–310. | PubMed | |
| 44. | PETERS H, BORDER WA & NOBLE NA. Tandem antifibrotic actions of L-arginine supplementation and low protein diet during the repair phase of experimental glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 2000; 57: 992–1001 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00927.x. | PubMed | |
| 45. | PETERS H, BORDER WA & NOBLE NA. Angiotensin II blockade and low-protein diet produce additive therapeutic effects in experimental glomerulonephritis. Kidney Intl 2000; 57: 1493–1501 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00994.x. |
| 46. | FERN RJ, YESKO CM & THORNHILL BA. et al Reduced angiotensinogen expression attenuates renal interstitial fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy in mice. J Clin Invest 1999; 103: 39–46. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 47. | BENIGNI A, CORNA D & MAFFI R. et al Renoprotective effect of contemporary blocking of angiotensin II and endothelin-1 in rats with membranous nephropathy. Kidney Int 1998; 54: 353–359. | PubMed | |
| 48. | REMUZZI G, ZOJA C & GAGLIARDINI E. et al Combining an antiproteinuric approach with mycophenolate mofetil fully suppresses progressive nephropathy of experimental animals. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10: 1542–1549. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 49. | AMANN K, SIMONAVICIENE A & MEDWEDEWA T. et al Blood pressure-independent additive effects of pharmacologic blockade of the renin-angiotensin and endothelin systems on progression in a low-renin model of renal damage. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 2572–2584. | PubMed | |
| 50. | BENIGNI A, ZOJA C & CORNA D. et al Add-on anti-TGF-beta antibody to ACE inhibitor arrests progressive diabetic nephropathy in the rat. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 1816–1824. | PubMed | |
| 51. | ISLAM M, BURKE JF & MCGOWAN TA. et al Effect of anti-transforming growth factor-beta antibodies in cyclosporine-induced renal dysfunction. Kidney Int 2001; 59: 498–506 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.059002498.x. | PubMed | |
| 52. | KAGAMI S, BORDER WA & MILLER DE. et al Angiotensin II stimulates extracellular matrix protein synthesis through induction of transforming growth factor-beta expression in rat glomerular mesangial cells. J Clin Invest 1994; 93: 2431–2437. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 53. | FUKUDA N, HU WY & KUBO A. et al Abnormal regulation of transforming growth factor-beta receptors on vascular smooth muscle cells from spontaneously hypertensive rats by angiotensin II. Hypertens 1998; 31: 672–677. |
| 54. | SIEGERT A, RITZ E & ORTH S. et al Differential regulation of transforming growth factor receptors by angiotensin II and transforming growth factor-beta1 in vascular smooth muscle. J Mol Med 1999; 77: 437–445 10.1007/s001090050374. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 55. | WOLF G, ZIYADEH FN & STAHL RA. Angiotensin II stimulates expression of transforming growth factor beta receptor type II in cultured mouse proximal tubular cells. J Mol Med 1999; 77: 556–564 10.1007/s001099900028. | PubMed | |
| 56. | LETTERIO JJ & ROBERTS AB. Regulation of immune responses by TGF-beta. Annu Rev Immunol 1998; 16: 137–161 10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.137. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 57. | PAWLUCZYK IZ & HARRIS KP. Transforming growth factor-beta suppresses macrophage-induced mesangial cell fibronectin expression. Kidney Int 2001; 60: 533–542 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.060002533.x. | Article | PubMed | |
| 58. | SUTO TS, FINE LG & SHIMIZU F. et al In vivo transfer of engineered macrophages into the glomerulus: Endogenous TGF-beta-mediated defense against macrophage-induced glomerular cell activation. J Immunol 1997; 159: 2476–2483. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 59. | LING H, LI X & JHA S. et al Therapeutic role of TGF-beta-neutralizing antibody in mouse cyclosporin A nephropathy: Morphologic improvement associated with functional preservation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 377–388. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank Linda Hoge for excellent technical assistance with these studies. The work was supported by a grant from Cambridge Antibody Technology (N.A.N.) and National Institutes of Health grants DK 49374 (W.A.B.), DK 43609 (W.A.B.), and DK 60508 (N.A.N.).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
Transforming growth factor β as a therapeutic target in systemic sclerosis
Nature Reviews Rheumatology Review (01 Apr 2009)
RESEARCH
Kidney International Original Article
Kidney International Original Article
Kidney International Original Article
Kidney International Original Article

inhibition and angiotensin II blockade results in enhanced antifibrotic effect
and proteoglycan production in experimental glomerulonephritis. J Clin Invest 1990; 86: 453–462. | 
