Perspectives in Renal Medicine
Kidney International (2004) 65, 1991–2002; doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00620.x
Differential effects of calcium antagonist subclasses on markers of nephropathy progression
GEORGE L BAKRIS, MATTHEW R WEIR, MICHELLE SECIC, BRETT CAMPBELL and ANNETTE WEIS-MCNULTY
Rush University Hypertension Center, Chicago, Illinois; Division of Nephrology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Secic Statistical Consulting, Inc., Chardon, Ohio; College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois; and Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
Correspondence: George L. Bakris, M.D., Rush University Hypertension Center, 1700 West Van Buren Street, Suite 470, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail: George_L_Bakris@rush.edu
Received 10 September 2003; Revised 15 October 2003; Re-revised 25 November 2003; Accepted 5 December 2003.
Abstract
Differential effects of calcium antagonist subclasses on markers of nephropathy progression.
Background
Numerous studies suggest that the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists (DCAs) and nondihydropyridine calcium antagonists (NDCAs) have differential antiproteinuric effects. Proteinuria reduction is a correlate of the progression of renal disease. In an earlier systematic review, calcium antagonists were shown as effective antihypertensive drugs, but there was uncertainty about their renal benefits in patients with proteinuria and renal insufficiency.
Methods
A systematic review was conducted to assess the differential effects of DCAs and NDCAs on proteinuria in hypertensive adults with proteinuria, with or without diabetes, and to determine whether these differential effects translate into altered progression of nephropathy. Studies included in the review had to be randomized clinical trials with at least 6 months of treatment, include a DCA or NDCA treatment arm, have one or more renal end points, and have been initiated after 1986. Summary data were extracted from 28 studies entered into two identical but separate databases, which were compared and evaluated by independent reviewers. The effects of each drug class on blood pressure (N = 1338) and proteinuria (N = 510) were assessed.
Results
After adjusting for sample size, study length, and baseline value, there were no statistically significant differences in the ability of either class of calcium antagonist to decrease blood pressure. The mean change in proteinuria was +2% for DCAs and -30% for NDCAs (95% CI, 10% to 54%, P = 0.01). Consistently greater reductions in proteinuria were associated with the use of NDCAs compared with DCAs, despite no significant differences in blood pressure reduction or presence of diabetes.
Conclusion
This analysis supports (1) similar efficacy between subclasses of calcium antagonists to lower blood pressure, and (2) greater reductions in proteinuria by NDCAs compared to DCAs in the presence or absence of diabetes. Based on these findings, NDCAs, alone or in combination with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), are suggested as preferred agents to lower blood pressure in hypertensive patients with nephropathy associated with proteinuria.
Keywords:
proteinuria, hypertension, diabetes, dialysis
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
RESEARCH
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism Brief Communication
Is the nitric oxide system involved in genetic hypertension in Dahl rats?
Kidney International Original Article
Understanding the nature of renal disease progression
Kidney International Original Article
Role of combination therapy with ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers in renal protection
Kidney International Original Article


