Cell Biology – Immunology – Pathology

Kidney International (1999) 55, 899–906; doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.055003899.x

Impaired lysosomal processing of bold beta2-microglobulin by infiltrating macrophages in dialysis amyloidosis

MAR GARCÍA-GARCÍA, ÀNGEL ARGILÉS, ANNIE GOUIN-CHARNET, MERCÈ DURFORT, JOSÉ GARCÍA-VALERO and GEORGES MOURAD

Institut de Génétique Humaine, Montpellier, France; Unit of Cell Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Physiology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France

Correspondence: Dr Àngel Argilés, Institut de Génétique Humaine—CNRS UPR 1142, 141, rue de la Cardonille, 34090 Montpellier Cedex 5, France. E-mail: Angel.Argiles@igh.cnrs.fr

Received 5 May 1998; Revised 10 September 1998; Accepted 25 September 1998.

Top

Abstract

Impaired lysosomal processing of beta2-microglobulin by infiltrating macrophages in dialysis amyloidosis.

Background

 

Macrophages may participate in amyloid fibril formation by processing the protein precursor. Although this theory seems to apply for amyloidosis, in which proteolytic cleavage is a prerequisite for amyloid fibril formation, it has not been demonstrated for beta2-microglobulin (beta2m) amyloidosis. We aimed to establish the role played by macrophages in beta2m amyloidosis.

Methods

 

We used a double immunogold electron microscopy technique, including mouse antihuman CD68, rabbit antihuman beta2m, amyloid P component, and lysosome-associated membrane protein (LAMP-1) antibodies. Differential density labeling studies of beta2m and amyloid P component were performed extra- and intracellularly to assess protein processing by macrophages.

Results

 

The cells surrounding amyloid fibrils were found to be mostly CD68 positive, suggesting that they were of monocyte–macrophage lineage. Intracellular accumulation of amyloid fibrils was also observed; these fibrils were constantly surrounded by LAMP-1–linked gold particles, demonstrating that intracellular beta2m was almost exclusively lysosomal. The rough-surface endoplasmic reticulum was not labeled by beta2m antibody, suggesting that there was no active synthesis of beta2m by the cells. As a marker of endocytosis, protruded cytoplasmic processes in close relation with the intracellular accumulations of beta2m amyloid fibrils were observed. No difference in density labeling (extracellular vs. intracellular) was observed for beta2m, whereas intracellular P component labeling was significantly decreased.

Conclusions

 

All of these data are strongly suggestive of phagocytosis and not synthesis of amyloid fibrils by macrophages. Further, they demonstrate an impaired lysosomal processing specific for beta2m, as other compounds of the amyloid fibrils (P component) are significantly cleared.

Keywords:

amyloid fibrils, phagocytosis, dialysis-related amyloidosis, toxicity

Amyloidosis is a disease characterized by the tissue deposition of insoluble protein fibrils. Amyloid deposits are positive for Congo red staining, showing green birefringence under polarized light and fibrillar appearance by electron microscope analysis1. Although amyloid deposition has been classically considered extracellular1, a few studies showing intracellular amyloid fibrils have been reported2,3,4,5,6. In some of these amyloidoses, it has been suggested that the cells participate in amyloid fibril formation by processing the precursor protein1.

Recently, the unprocessed protein precursor, serum amyloid A (AA), and the proteolyzed protein, AA, have been found within the lysosomes in AA amyloidosis7. Because AA fibrils contain proteolyzed amyloid protein, it has been suggested that intralysosomal proteolysis would be a prerequisite for amyloid fibril formation7. However, the possibility exists that intralysosomal amyloid fibrils were the product of phagocytosis. Although most of the reports dealing with the monocytic involvement in the pathogenesis of amyloidosis propose an active participation in the formation and subsequent shedding of amyloid fibrils by these cells, there are no conclusive studies allowing the rejection of the hypothesis of a simple phagocytosis of already formed amyloid fibrils. If the latter were true, the macrophage participation would be part of the reactive phenomena commonly seen in other inflammatory processes rather than the cause of amyloidosis.

Dialysis-related amyloidosis (DRA), described in the 1980s, is a type of amyloidosis with a clear predilection for osteoarticular structures, which is mainly observed in long-term dialysis patients8,9. Carpal tunnel syndrome, scapulohumeral periarthritis, and pain are the main clinical features9,10. Biochemically, the main protein component of DRA fibrils has been identified as beta2-microglobulin (beta2m)11. The mechanisms by which beta2m precipitates into amyloid fibrils remain unclear.

Although the protein constituents of DRA have been well assessed, the cellular participation on the genesis of the amyloid fibrils has been less investigated. Only a few reports have characterized the cells surrounding amyloid deposits in DRA3,5,12, and it is not known if the presence of these cells is at the origin of the amyloid fibrils or if they accumulate in amyloid deposits because of the existence of amyloid fibrils. Our aim in this study was to clarify the cellular participation on the pathogenesis of beta2m amyloidosis. We performed electron microscopy studies with simple and/or double immunogold labeling, as well as with differential density labeling quantitation. These techniques allowed us to assess the structural relations between amyloid deposits and the surrounding cells. Furthermore, by identifying the cytosolic endomembranes and locating the intracellular beta2m, we were able to hypothesize on the participation of the cellular organelles (those related with synthesis as well as those related with the degradative pathways) on the pathogenesis of amyloidosis. Finally, the intracellular and extracellular behavior of beta2m was compared with those of other constituents of amyloid deposits, such as the amyloid P component, to know whether these proteins are handled differently by the incriminated cells.

Top

METHODS

Patients and samples

Amyloid deposits were obtained from carpal tunnel of three men and one woman, who were 65 plusminus 4 years old, and had dialysis-related amyloidosis. Their renal diseases were chronic glomerulonephritis (three patients) and autosomal-dominant polycystic renal disease (the remaining one). None of the patients had systemic diseases known to be associated with amyloidosis.

Sample preparation and immunohistochemistry

Congo red staining.
 

Unfixed amyloid deposits surgically obtained were immersed in O.C.T. compound (Miles Inc., Diagnostics Division, Elkhart, IN, USA), frozen, and stored at -70°C. Cryostat sections of 10 mum were transferred onto gelatin-coated (0.3%) glass slides and were stained with Congo red (Searle Scientific Services, High Wycombe Bucks, UK) following a slight modification of Puchtler's method13. Briefly, sections were dehydrated in 70% ethanol for five minutes and were then treated with an alkaline-saturated salt solution. The stained sections were mounted in a medium compatible with organic solvents and were observed under polarized light in a Zeiss microscope (Oberkochen, Germany).

Immunogold methods.
 

Blocks of approximately 1 mm3 of amyloid deposits were fixed in 4% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde and 0.1% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, for two hours at 4°C.

Single immunolabeling.
 

Samples were progressively dehydrated in graded ethanols and were finally embedded in Lowicryl K4M (Chemische Werke Lowi, Wald-Kraiburg, Germany) as previously described14. Ultrathin sections (60 to 90 nm) were obtained using an Ultracut E system (Reichert-Jung, Wien, Austria) and were mounted on formvar-coated and etched gold grids. Before labeling, sections were rinsed twice with 0.1 M glycine-PBS for five minutes and were incubated with 2% ovalbumin in PBS for 30 minutes to block unspecific antibody–antigen complexes. The grids were then incubated with polyclonal anti-beta2m (dilution 1:500; Nordic, Tilburg, The Netherlands) or anti-amyloid P component (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) antibodies in ovalbumin-PBS for two hours. After three 15-minute rinses in glycine-PBS, bound antibodies were visualized with 10 nm protein A gold (provided by Dr. J.W. Slot, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands). The sections were finally rinsed with PBS and were double distilled in water prior to counterstaining with aqueous uranyl acetate and lead citrate.

Double immunolabeling.
 

For double immunolabeling, the samples were fixed as for single labeling, cryoprotected by infusing 2.1 M sucrose in PBS, snap freezing, and storing in liquid nitrogen until analysis. Ultrathin cryosections were obtained using an FC-40 cryosystem (Reichert-Jung) and transferred to formvar-coated and etched gold grids in a drop of 2.3 M sucrose in PBS. Before labeling, sections were rinsed twice with 0.1 M glycine-PBS for 10 minutes and were incubated with 2% ovalbumin in PBS for 20 minutes. For immunolabeling, sections were first incubated with anti-beta2-microglobulin antibodies for 30 minutes and were labeled with 15 nm protein A gold after three glycine-PBS rinses. Then the sections were stabilized for five minutes with 0.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS, blocked with 150 mM NH4Cl in PBS, and incubated with a rabbit anti-human lysosome-associated membrane protein (LAMP-1) antibody (dilution 1:120; provided by Dr. S.R. Carlsson, University of Umea, Umea, Sweden) or monoclonal anti-CD68 antibody (dilution 1:100; Dako) followed by unlabeled rabbit antimouse Ig (dilution 1:50; Dako). The ultrathin sections were rinsed with PBS and double-distilled water, were then counterstained with uranyl acetate, and were embedded in methyl cellulose15.

Controls were performed with the omission of the primary and/or the secondary antibodies, and/or the omission of the rabbit antimouse Ig. Examination was performed in a Hitachi H-600 AB and a Philips EM-300 transmission electron microscopes.

Morphology studies

Semithin sections of 1 mum were obtained from small blocks of amyloid deposits embedded in Lowicryl K4M resin. Sections were transferred onto glass slides and were stained with 0.5% methylene blue 0.5% Borax for 30 seconds at 90°C. The stained sections were then mounted in DPX medium and were observed in a Polyvar 2 optical microscope (Reichert-Jung) under immersion oil.

For ultrastructural studies, small pieces of amyloid deposits were fixed as for Lowicryl embedding and were postfixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (vol/vol) in PBS. Then the samples were progressively treated in graded acetone-resin solutions, postfixed with 0.1% osmium tetroxide, and embedded in Spurr (Agar Scientific LTD, Stansted, UK). Ultrathin sections were obtained as for Lowicryl embedded samples using an Ultracut E system and were then counterstained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate before examination in the transmission electron microscope.

Quantitative evaluation of labeling density

Label density was estimated as the number of gold particles per area of amyloid deposit by stereological methods16. Differences were checked using the Student's t-test. A P of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Top

RESULTS

Amyloid diagnosis

The surgically obtained deposits were of amyloid origin, as they were positively stained with Congo red and displayed apple-green birefringence under polarized light. An example of Congo red staining without and with polarized light is given in Figure 1 a and b, respectively.

Figure 1.
Figure 1 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Amyloid criteria: Congo red staining of a beta2-microglobulin amyloid deposit observed under light microscopy (A) and under polarized light (B). The publication of this figure in color was made possible by a grant from Gambro Renal Care R&D, Lund, Sweden.

Full figure and legend (192K)

Deposits and related cells

Amyloid deposits were observed as nodules, consisting of intercellular amorphous material and long-shaped cells as well as macrophages. The long-shaped cells contained in the nodules presented an enlarged perinuclear region with long and narrow cytoplasmic processes extending to the amyloid material Figure 2. Electron microscopy showed that the extracellular material had a heterogeneous composition consisting of amyloid clumps and some scattered collagen fibers. The macrophage-like cells had an irregular surface with numerous invaginations that were usually occupied by the amyloid clumps (Figure 2 a, b). The cytoplasm had a granular appearance and showed a well-developed Golgi compartment, endoplasmic reticulum, and vesicle compartments. The vesicles seemed generated by endocytosis of the fibrillar clumps Figure 2c. The extracellular amyloid clumps were heavily labeled with anti-beta2m antibody Figure 2b.

Figure 2.
Figure 2 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Amyloid deposit location and beta2-microglobulin distribution. (Inset) Methylene blue staining showing the cell distribution around the amyloid fibrils. (a) Electron microscopy showing a cell engulfing an amyloid deposit (short thick arrows). Cellular processes are indicated by thin arrows (times18,000). Immunogold labeling with anti-beta2-microglobulin antibody showing an extracellular (b) and intracellular (c) location of an amyloid deposit (times27,000).

Full figure and legend (368K)

Amyloid fibrils immunoreactive for anti-beta2m antibody were also observed within the cytoplasm of macrophage-like cells. These intracellular fibrils were usually contained in vesicles, and cytoplasmic amyloid clumps were seldom devoid of membrane Figure 2c and 3. Intracellular labeling of beta2m was clearly not associated with the compartments related to the synthesis and secretory pathways of cells (endoplasmic reticulum or the Golgi compartment; Figure 3b).

Figure 3.
Figure 3 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Intracellular immunolocalization of beta2-microglobulin. No labeling with anti-beta2-microglobulin antibody was observed in endoplasmic reticulum (er) (a, times33,000) nor in the Golgi compartment (g) (b, times33,000). (c) Double immunolabeling for times2-microglobulin (15 nm) and lysosome-associated protein (LAMP-1; 10 nm) showing that amyloid fibrils are within the lysosomes (times40,000). (d) Double immunolabeling for beta2-microglobulin (15 nm) and CD68 (10 nm) confirming that amyloid fibrils are within the lysosomes and that the cells involved are of macrophage-monocytic lineage (times40,000).

Full figure and legend (304K)

Two series of studies of double immunolabeling were performed using the LAMP-1 or KP1 in addition to beta2m and amyloid P component antibodies, to characterize the cytoplasmic membranes containing amyloid fibrils. When anti-beta2m antibody was incubated along with a polyclonal antihuman LAMP-1 antibody (lysosome marker), both antibodies colocalized on the same vesicular structures Figure 3c. Some vesicles labeled with anti-beta2m antibody were only weakly labeled with LAMP-1 antibody. According to their location (marginal, close to the plasma membrane) and to their immunolabeling pattern (near constant LAMP-1 label), these vesicles had an endocytic character (that is, early endosomes or endocytic vesicles; Figure 3c).

When anti-beta2m antibody was incubated along with KP1 antibody, their labeling again colocalized within the same vesicles. Because KP1 antibody is a lysosomal marker specific for monocytes/macrophages that is directed against the CD68 antigen, these experiments confirmed both the lysosomal character of the vesicles containing amyloid fibrils and the monocyte–macrophage lineage of the cells associated with the amyloid deposits.

Density labeling of beta2m and amyloid P component

The presence of numerous lysosomes filled with beta2m fibrils suggests a failure in degrading the engulfed material by the macrophages. To verify this hypothesis, differential density labeling studies between intracellular and extracellular material were performed for beta2m. Furthermore, the same studies were performed assessing the extracellular and intracellular density labeling of amyloid P component. Amyloid P component is a common constituent of most types of amyloidoses, irrespective of the characteristics of their major protein component. Extracellular density labeling for beta2m was not significantly different from the intracellular one (Figure 4 a, b). On the contrary, extracellular density labeling for amyloid P component was significantly stronger than the intracellular one (Figure 4 c, d), suggesting that the engulfed amyloid P component is processed by the cells, whereas there is no cellular processing of beta2m. The analysis of the density labeling is summarized in Table 1.

Figure 4.
Figure 4 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Density labeling studies of beta2-microglobulin and amyloid P component (APC): Comparison of intracellular and extracellular protein density. It can be observed that extracellular labeling of beta2-microglobulin (a, times27,000) was similar to that observed intracellularly (b, times27,000), whereas a clear decrease in intracellular APC labeling (d, times33,000) was observed when comparing with extracellular APC labeling (c times37,800).

Full figure and legend (311K)


Top

DISCUSSION

Our study shows, by immunogold labeling, that most of the cells around and between beta2m amyloid deposits were monocyte–macrophages, presenting cytoplasmic extension processes surrounding extracellular beta2m fibrils. Some cells, also positive for macrophage markers, contained intracellular beta2m amyloid fibrils. Double immunogold labeling allowed us for the first time to localize precisely intracellular beta2m fibrils within the lysosomes: LAMP-1 antibody was distributed on and underneath the membranes of the vesicles containing beta2m amyloid fibrils. These results were fully confirmed by KP1 antibody immunostaining. Finally, and more importantly, the analysis of differential density labeling of beta2m and amyloid P component showed that monocyte–macrophage cells are unable to degrade beta2m once it is in the lysosomes and that this impaired lysosomal function is specific for beta2m.

The studies aiming to characterize the cells participating in amyloid formation and/or persistence resulted in the identification of a variety of cells with a common feature: their monocyte–macrophage lineage2,5,12,17,18. We have previously established, by specific antigen typing, the frequency of the different leukocyte cell types surrounding the amyloid deposits12. However, there were no previous immunohistochemical studies at the ultrastructural level confirming the identity of the cells.

Because in most of the different amyloidoses the amyloid proteins result from partial proteolytic digestion of their precursors, proteolysis has been considered for a long time as a prerequisite for amyloid fibril formation1. Because monocytes and macrophages are enriched in lysosomal structures that may proteolyze the different amyloid precursors, these cells have been thought to be responsible for the amyloid fibril formation1,2,4,192021. However, the opposite may also hold true, and macrophages could participate in the reaction processes of amyloidosis by trying to remove the amyloid fibrils as they clear other exogenous or endogenous material22,23. If this were the case, extracellular amyloid deposition would take place when the rate of amyloid production overcomes the clearing capacity of macrophages.

Interestingly, there are a few exceptions to the proteolysis rule in amyloidosis. The first known exception has been beta2m amyloidosis. Although a few reports suggest that the amyloidogenic beta2m may be proteolyzed in its N-terminal side24, several groups have shown that the amyloid deposits in beta2m amyloidosis are mainly constituted of intact beta2m25,26. Other examples of unproteolyzed precursor proteins have been reported subsequently by Buxbaun for the AL type of amyloidosis27 and by Ericsson et al for the AA type of amyloidosis28. Finally, atrial natriuretic factor is frequently found in intact form in amyloid fibrils of the senile type of amyloidosis29.

Our findings are very much supportive of a phagocytosis role for monocyte macrophages and render less likely the participation of these cells in the synthesis of amyloid fibrils. (a) We found the extracellular amyloid fibrils frequently surrounded by cellular extensions at different stages of endocytosis. (b) We observed intracellular beta2m unevenly distributed and located the amyloid fibrils within the lysosomes, and (c) we observed no label for beta2m in the synthesis pathways of the cells.

Because the amyloidogenic beta2m is intact in its N-terminal side, it seems unlikely that macrophages with lysosomes filled with beta2m participate in synthesis of amyloid fibrils.

A second line of evidence supporting the phagocytic role for the cells surrounding amyloid fibrils comes from Alzheimer's disease. Cataldo et al reported the up-regulation of cathepsin D synthesis and the accumulation of hydrolase-laden lysosomes in pyramidal neurons, indicating that the endosomal-lysosomal system is abnormally activated in Alzheimer's disease30. On the other hand, the addition of inhibitors of lysosomal proteinases does not block the formation of amyloid fibrils in the in vitro setting313233. In other words, the endosomal-lysosomal system is activated, but its blockade does not result in preventing the formation of amyloid fibrils. Thus, such activation would be a consequence rather than the cause of amyloid fibril formation. In keeping with the phagocytic hypothesis, no detection of messenger RNA of amyloid protein precursor (APP) has been found by in situ hybridization in plaque-associated microglia, suggesting no synthesis of the amyloid precursor34.

Once the ultrastructural studies enabled us to conclude that amyloid fibrils are contained in lysosomes, we aimed to step further and assessed the degradation of the different proteins of these amyloid fibrils. We compared the density labeling of the extracellular amyloid fibrils in regard to the intracellular ones. It came out clearly from our studies that macrophages were able to degrade the amyloid P component through phagocytosis and lysosomal processing. On the contrary, beta2m, after being internalized by the same cells, was not processed further. Therefore, the lysosomes of macrophages were unable to pursue the processing of beta2m. Whether the lack of processing of beta2m is due to the conformational situation of the molecule within amyloid fibrils or to an intrinsic characteristic of beta2m is not known. Very recently, Inoue et al have nicely shown the arrangement of beta2m, amyloid P component, and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan within amyloid fibrils35. According to these elegant ultrastructural studies, beta2m is associated with the surface of the amyloid fibrils35 and would be accessible to lysosomal proteases. Therefore, the structure of beta2m, comprising of two beta-pleated sheets of three and four strands, respectively, may render it resistant to degradation. Whether the accumulated beta2m behaves like a cell toxin remains to be demonstrated.

In summary, although the biochemical analysis of the different types of amyloidosis is quite well established, the cellular participation has been less assessed. There is some controversy as to whether the cells surrounding the amyloid deposits synthesize the amyloid fibrils or are there to degrade them. Previous studies on AL and AA amyloidoses suggested a synthesis role. Our analysis of beta2m amyloid deposits showed that the phagocytic cells frequently observed in amyloid deposits have cytoplasmic extension processes in regards to the beta2m amyloid fibril-enriched zones. Further, it showed that the intracellular beta2m is preferentially and almost exclusively intralysosomal, and there were no signs of synthesis of beta2m or amyloid fibrils. We have previously reported the identification of the major serum antiprotease alpha2-macroglobulin in beta2m amyloid deposits36 and proposed a role for antiproteases in the pathogenesis of amyloidosis37. These data represent an extension from the protein to the cellular level on the assessment of the catabolism of amyloid fibrils. We hypothesize that failure of lysosomes to degrade intact beta2m may be one of the key points in the pathogenesis of beta2m amyloidosis. Our data are supportive of a phagocytic role for macrophages and provide some evidence that lysosomal function is not effective in processing and clearing beta2m, suggesting a putative beta2m toxicity on these cells.

Top

References

  1. GLENNER, GG: Amyloid deposits and amyloidosis. N Engl J Med 1980 302: 1283–1292, 1333–1343,  | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  2. Fuks, A, Zucher-Franklin, D: Impaired Kupffer cell function precedes development of secondary amyloidosis. J Exp Med 1985 161: 1013–1028,  | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  3. Depierreux, M, Goldman, M, Fayt, I, Richard, C, Quintin, J, Dhaene, M, Van Herweghem, JL: Osteoarticular amyloidosis associated with haemodialysis: An immunoultrastructural study. J Clin Pathol 1988 41: 158–162,  | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  4. Takahashi, M, Yokota, T, Kawano, H, Gondo, T, Ishihara, T, Ychino, F: Ultrastructural evidence for intracellular formation of amyloid fibrils in macrophages. Virchows Arch 1989 415: 411–419,  | ISI | ChemPort |
  5. Nishi, S, Ogino, S, Marayama, Y, Horama, N, Gejyo, F, Morita, T, Arakawa, M: Electron-microscopic and immunohistochemical study of beta2m-related amyloidosis. Nephron 1990 56: 357–363,  | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  6. de Koning, E, Morris, EF, Posthuma, G, Höppener, J, Morris, J, Capel, P, Clark, A, Verbeek, J: Intra and extracellular amyloid fibrils are formed in cultured pancreatic islets of transgenic mice expressing human islet amyloid polypeptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994 91: 8467–8471,  | PubMed | ChemPort |
  7. Chronopoulos, S, Laird, DW, Ali-Khan, Z: Immunolocalization of SAA and AA amyloid in lysosomes in murine monocytoid cells: Confocal and immunogold EM studies. J Pathol 1994 173: 361–369,  | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  8. Assenat, H, Calemard, D, Charra, B, Laurent, G, Terrat, JC: Hémodialyse, syndrome du canal carpien et substance amyloïde (letter). Nouv Press Med 1980 24: 1715,
  9. Charra, B, Calemard, F, Uzan, M, Terrat, JC, Vanel, T, Laurent, G: Carpal tunnel syndrome, shoulder pain and amyloid deposits in long-term hemodialysis patients. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 1984 21: 291–295,  | ISI |
  10. Bardin, T, Kuntz, D: The arthropathy of chronic hemodialysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1987 5: 379–386,  | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  11. Gejyo, F, Yamada, T, Odani, S, Nakagawa, Y, Arakawa, M, Kunimoto, T, Kataoka, H, Suzuki, M, Hirasawa, Y, Shirahama, T, Cohen, AS, Schimid, K: A new form of amyloid protein associated with chronic hemodialysis was identified as beta2m. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1985 129: 701–706,  | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  12. Argilés, A, Mourad, G, Kerr, P, García, M, Collins, B, Demaille, J: Cells surrounding haemodialysis-associated amyloid deposits are mainly macrophages. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1994 9: 662–667,  | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  13. Putchler, H, Sweat, F, Levine, M: Binding of Congo Red by amyloid. J Histochem Cytochem 1962 10: 355–364,  | ISI | ChemPort |
  14. Carlemaln, E, Garavito, RM, Villiger, W: Resin development for electron microscopy and an analysis of embedding at low temperature. J Microsc 1982 126: 123–143,  | ISI | ChemPort |
  15. Tokuyasu, KT: Immunocytochemistry on ultrathin sections. Histochem J 1980 12: 381–403,  | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  16. WEIBEL, ER: Stereological methods, in Practical Methods for Biological Morphometry, 1979 New York, Academic Press,
  17. Kisilevsky, R, Lyon, AW, Young, I: A critical analysis of postulated pathogenetic mechanisms in amyloidogenesis. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1992 29: 59–82,  | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  18. Ohashi, K, Hara, M, Kawai, R, Ogura, Y, Honda, K, Nihei, H, Mimura, N: Cervical discs are most susceptible to beta2-microglobulin amyloid deposition in the vertebral column. Kidney Int 1992 41: 1646–1652,  | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  19. Ramadori, G, Gieder, H, Sipe, J, Shirahama, T, Meyer Zum Büschenfelde, KH: Murine tissue macrophages synthesize and secrete amyloid proteins different to amyloid (AA). Eur J Clin Invest 1989 19: 316–322,  | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  20. Shirahama, T, Cohen, AS: An analysis of the close relationship of lysosomes to early deposits of amyloid. Am J Pathol 1973 73: 97–114,  | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  21. Shirahama, T, Cohen, AS: Intralysosomal formation of amyloid fibrils. Am J Pathol 1975 81: 101–116,  | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  22. Johnston, RB: Monocytes and macrophages. N Engl J Med 1988 318: 747–775,  | PubMed | ISI |
  23. Zucker-Franklin, D: Immunophagocytosis of human amyloid fibrils by leukocytes. J Ultrastruc Res 1970 32: 247–257,  | ChemPort |
  24. Linke, RP, Hampl, H, Lobeck, H, Ritz, E, Bommer, J, Waldherr, R, Eulitz, M: Lysine-specific cleavage of B2m in amyloid deposits associated with hemodialysis. Kidney Int 1989 36: 675–681,  | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  25. Argilés, A, García-García, M, Derancourt, J, Mourad, G, Demaille, JG: beta2-microglobulin isoforms in healthy individuals and in amyloid deposits. Kidney Int 1995 48: 1397–1405,  | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  26. García-García, M, García-Valero, J, Mourad, G, Argilés, A: Urinary and serum beta2-microglobulin in living related kidney donors and in renal failure. Contrib Nephrol 1995 112: 77–82,  | PubMed |
  27. Buxbaun, J: Aberrant immunoglobulin synthesis in light chain amyloidosis. J Clin Invest 1986 78: 798–806,  | PubMed |
  28. Ericsson, LH, Eriksen, N, Walsh, KA, Benditt, EP: Primary structure of duck amyloid protein A: The form deposited in tissues may be identical to its serum precursor. FEBS Lett 1987 218: 16–21,
  29. Johansson, B, Wernstedt, C, Westermark, P: Atrial natriuretic peptide deposited as atrial amyloid fibrils. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1987 148: 1087–1092,  | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  30. Cataldo, AM, Barnett, JL, Berman, SA, Li, J, Quarless, S, Bursztajn, S, Lippa, C, Nixon, RA: Gene expression and cellular content of cathepsin D in Alzheimer's disease brain evidence for early up-regulation of the endosomal-lysosomal system. Neuron 1995 14: 671–680,  | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  31. Haass, C, Hung, AY, Schlossmacher, MG, Teplow, DB, Selkoe, DJ: beta-Amyloid peptide and a 3-kDa fragment are derived by distinct cellular mechanisms. J Biol Chem 1993 268: 3021–3024,  | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  32. Busciglio, J, Gabuzda, DH, Yankner, BA: Generation of beta-amyloid in the secretory pathway in neuronal and nonneuronal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993 90: 2092–2096,  | PubMed | ChemPort |
  33. Higaki, J, Quon, D, Zhong, Z, Cordell, B: Inhibition of beta-amyloid formation identifies proteolytic precursors and subcellular site of catabolism. Neuron 1995 14: 651–659,  | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  34. Scott, S, Johnson, S, Zarow, C, Perlmutter, L: Inability to detect beta-amyloid protein precursor mRNA in Alzheimer plaque-associated microglia. Exp Neurol 1993 121: 113–118,  | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  35. Inoue, S, Kuroiwa, M, Ohashi, K, Hara, M, Kisilevsky, R: Ultrastructural organisation of hemodialysis-associated beta2-microglobulin amyloid fibrils. Kidney Int 1997 52: 1543–1549,  | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  36. Argilés, A, Mourad, G, Axelrud-Cavadore, C, Watrin, A, Mion, C, Cavadore, JC: High molecular weight proteins in haemodialysis associated amyloidosis. Clin Sci 1989 76: 547–552,  | PubMed |
  37. Argilés, A, Mourad, G, Atkins, RC, Mion, C: New insights in the pathogenesis of hemodialysis associated amyloidosis (editorial). Semin Dial 1990 3: 149–152,
Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Baxter Healthcare Corporation for contributing to the funding of this work through its Extramural Grant Program. The Centre Hospitalier Universitaire of Montpellier also funded this study. M.G. was a recipient of a grant from the CIRIT—Direcció General de Recerca, Generalitat de Catalunya. We thank Almudena García and the staff of Serveis Científico-Tècnics (Universitat de Barcelona) for technical assistance. The publication of Figure 1 in color was made possible by a grant from Gambro Renal Care R&D, Lund, Sweden. A part of the results included in this study was orally presented at the XXXIIIrd ERA-EDTA meeting in Amsterdam.

Extra navigation

.
ADVERTISEMENT