Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

A population study of first and subsequent pregnancy smoking behaviors in Ohio

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

The objective of this study is to identify maternal characteristics associated with non-smoking during a subsequent pregnancy after first pregnancy smoking.

Study Design:

We conducted a retrospective population-based analysis of Ohio vital birth records from 2007 to 2013. We used logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for detection of characteristics associated with non-smoking during a subsequent pregnancy after first pregnancy smoking.

Results:

Among 75 190 mothers, 75.6% were non-smokers and 13.7% were smokers during both pregnancies. During their first pregnancy, 49.7% of 15 075 smokers quit. Of them, 50.1% remained non-smokers during their subsequent pregnancy. Women who reduced, but continued smoking during their first pregnancy, were more than five times as likely to smoke during their subsequent pregnancy than women who quit (odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 2.85 (2.43 to 3.35) vs 0.55 (0.45 to 0.67)).

Conclusion:

Interventions targeting complete cessation, rather than reduction in smoking among first-time mothers, may be the most effective at optimizing long-term health benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aliyu MH, Lynch O, Saidu R, Alio AP, Marty PJ, Salihu HM . Intrauterine exposure to tobacco and risk of medically indicated and spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Perinatol 2010; 27 (5): 405–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ko TJ, Tsai LY, Chu LC, Yeh SJ, Leung C, Chen CY et al. Parental smoking during pregnancy and its association with low birth weight, small for gestational age, and preterm birth offspring: a birth cohort study. Pediatr Neonatol 2014; 55 (1): 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Salihu HM, Aliyu MH, Pierre-Louis BJ, Alexander GR . Levels of excess infant deaths attributable to maternal smoking during pregnancy in the United States. Matern Child Health J 2003; 7 (4): 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Centers for Disease Control. Effects of maternal cigarette smoking on birth weight and preterm birth—Ohio, 1989. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1990; 39 (38): 662–665.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Isayama T, Shah PS, Ye XY, Dunn M, Da Silva O, Alvaro R et al. Adverse impact of maternal cigarette smoking on preterm infants: a population-based cohort study. Am J Perinatol 2015; 32 (12): 1105–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Markowitz S . The effectiveness of cigarette regulations in reducing cases of sudden infant death syndrome. J Health Econ 2008; 27 (1): 106–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohsin M, Jalaludin B . Influence of previous pregnancy outcomes and continued smoking on subsequent pregnancy outcomes: an exploratory study in Australia. BJOG 2008; 115 (11): 1428–1435.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tong VT, Dietz PM, Morrow B, D'Angelo DV, Farr SL, Rockhill KM et al. Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy—Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, United States, 40 sites, 2000-2010. MMWR Surveill Summ 2013; 62 (6): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shisler S, Homish GG, Molnar DS, Schuetze P, Colder CR, Eiden RD . Predictors of changes in smoking from third trimester to 9 months postpartum. Nicotine Tob Res 2016; 18 (1): 84–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Healthy People 2020. Maternal, Infant, and Child Health. 2015 (cited: 20 February 2016). Available from https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/maternal-infant-and-child-health/objectives.

  11. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion no. 471: smoking cessation during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116 (5): 1241–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The First Method: The 5 A’s - For Those Ready to Quit. 2015 (cited: 25 February 2016). Available from http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Districts/District-II/Smoking-Cessation-The-5-As.

  13. Chamberlain C, O'Mara-Eves A, Oliver S, Caird JR, Perlen SM, Eades SJ et al. Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 10: CD001055.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu H, Wen LM, Rissel C, Baur LA . Smoking status and factors associated with smoking of first-time mothers during pregnancy and postpartum: findings from the Healthy Beginnings Trial. Matern Child Health J 2013; 17 (6): 1151–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ratner PA, Johnson JL, Bottorff JL, Dahinten S, Hall W . Twelve-month follow-up of a smoking relapse prevention intervention for postpartum women. Addict Behav 2000; 25 (1): 81–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kahn RS, Certain L, Whitaker RC . A reexamination of smoking before, during, and after pregnancy. Am J Public Health 2002; 92 (11): 1801–1808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Health Policy Instutute of Ohio. The state of tobacco use prevention and cessation in Ohio. 2015 (cited 26 February 2016). Available from http://www.healthpolicyohio.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PolicyBrief_Tobacco.pdf.

  18. March of Dimes. Peristats. Accessed: 8 June 2016 (cited). Available from http://www.marchofdimes.org/peristats/whatsnew.aspx?id=35.

  19. Ohio Department of Health, Office of Vital Statistics. Neonatal, Postneonatal, and Infant Mortality, Ohio and Selected Counties, 2007–2012. 2014 (cited: 14 February 2016). Available from http://www.odh.ohio.gov/~/media/ODH/ASSETS/Files/cfhs/Infant%20Mortality/collaborative/2014/2007-2012%20IM%20BY%20RACE%20%20COUNTY.ashx.

  20. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK . Births: preliminary data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2014; 63 (2): 12.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hall ES, Goyal NK, Ammerman RT, Miller MM, Jones DE, Short JA et al. Development of a linked perinatal data resource from state administrative and community-based program data. Matern Child Health J 2014; 18 (1): 316–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohio Department of Health. Mother’s Worksheet for Child’s Birth. 2014 (cited: 14 June 2016). Available from http://vitalsupport.odh.ohio.gov/gd/gd.aspx?Page=3&TopicRelationID=306&Content=5994.

  23. American Cancer Society. Guide to Quitting Smoking 2014 (cited: 14 June 2016). Available from http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/cid/documents/webcontent/002971-pdf.pdf.

  24. Song YM, Sung J, Cho HJ . Reduction and cessation of cigarette smoking and risk of cancer: a cohort study of Korean men. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26 (31): 5101–5106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. LeClere FB, Wilson JB . Smoking behavior of recent mothers, 18-44 years of age, before and after pregnancy: United States, 1990. Adv Data 1997; (288): 1–11.

  26. Yu SM, Park CH, Schwalberg RH . Factors associated with smoking cessation among U.S. pregnant women. Matern Child Health J 2002; 6 (2): 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ma Y, Goins KV, Pbert L, Ockene JK . Predictors of smoking cessation in pregnancy and maintenance postpartum in low-income women. Matern Child Health J 2005; 9 (4): 393–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Miller TR . Projected outcomes of nurse-family partnership home visitation during 1996-2013, USA. Prev Sci 2015; 16 (6): 765–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rice VH, Hartmann-Boyce J, Stead LF . Nursing interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 8: CD001188.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kitzman H, Olds DL, Sidora K, Henderson CR Jr., Hanks C, Cole R et al. Enduring effects of nurse home visitation on maternal life course: a 3-year follow-up of a randomized trial. JAMA 2000; 283 (15): 1983–1989.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Olds DL, Kitzman H, Cole R, Robinson J, Sidora K, Luckey DW et al. Effects of nurse home-visiting on maternal life course and child development: age 6 follow-up results of a randomized trial. Pediatrics 2004; 114 (6): 1550–1559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Olds DL, Kitzman H, Hanks C, Cole R, Anson E, Sidora-Arcoleo K et al. Effects of nurse home visiting on maternal and child functioning: age-9 follow-up of a randomized trial. Pediatrics 2007; 120 (4): e832–e845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ohio Department of Health. Help Me Grow: Home Visiting Program Report. 2013 (cited: 20 February 2016). Available from http://www.helpmegrow.ohio.gov/~/media/HelpMeGrow/ASSETS/Files/Professionals%20Gallery/HMG%20Home%20Visiting/HV%20Reports/Help%20Me%20Grow%20Home%20Visiting%20Report%202013.pdf.

  34. The PEW Center on the States. The Business Case for Home Visiting 2011 (cited: 26 February 2016). Available from http://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/pcs_assets/2012/hvbusinessleadersbrieffinalpdf.pdf.

  35. Chertok IR, Luo J, Anderson RH . Association between changes in smoking habits in subsequent pregnancy and infant birth weight in West Virginia. Matern Child Health J 2011; 15 (2): 249–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nordstrom ML, Cnattingius S . Smoking habits and birthweights in two successive births in Sweden. Early Hum Dev 1994; 37 (3): 195–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Schramm WF . Smoking during pregnancy: Missouri longitudinal study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1997; 11 (Suppl 1): 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wilcox MA, Chang AM, Johnson IR . The effects of parity on birthweight using successive pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75 (5): 459–553.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Reichman NE, Hade EM . Validation of birth certificate data. A study of women in New Jersey’s HealthStart program. Ann Epidemiol 2001; 11 (3): 186–193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Reichman NE, Schwartz-Soicher O . Accuracy of birth certificate data by risk factors and outcomes: analysis of data from New Jersey. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197 (1): 32 e31–32 e38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mattsson K, Kallen K, Rignell-Hydbom A, Lindh CH, Jonsson BA, Gustafsson P et al. Cotinine validation of self-reported smoking during pregnancy in the Swedish medical birth register. Nicotine Tob Res 2016; 18 (1): 79–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Heath AC, Knopik VS, Madden PA, Neuman RJ, Lynskey MJ, Slutske WS et al. Accuracy of mothers’ retrospective reports of smoking during pregnancy: comparison with twin sister informant ratings. Twin Res 2003; 6 (4): 297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dietz PM, Homa D, England LJ, Burley K, Tong VT, Dube SR et al. Estimates of nondisclosure of cigarette smoking among pregnant and nonpregnant women of reproductive age in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 173 (3): 355–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pickett KE, Rathouz PJ, Kasza K, Wakschlag LS, Wright R . Self-reported smoking, cotinine levels, and patterns of smoking in pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2005; 19 (5): 368–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hall ES, Wexelblatt SL, Greenberg JM . Self-reported and laboratory evaluation of late pregnancy nicotine exposure and drugs of abuse. J Perinatol advance online publication 7 July 2016. jp.2016.100.

  46. Pickett KE, Wakschlag LS, Dai L, Leventhal BL . Fluctuations of maternal smoking during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101 (1): 140–147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study includes data provided by the ODH, which should not be considered an endorsement of the study or its conclusions. This work was supported by the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Perinatal Institute and Cradle Cincinnati.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E S Hall.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hall, E., Venkatesh, M. & Greenberg, J. A population study of first and subsequent pregnancy smoking behaviors in Ohio. J Perinatol 36, 948–953 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.119

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links