Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Does diagnosis influence end-of-life decisions in the neonatal intensive care unit?

Journal of Perinatology volume 35, pages 151–154 (2015)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the influence of physiological status and diagnosis at the time of death on end-of-life care.

Study Design:

Retrospective descriptive study in a regional referral level IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of infants who died from 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2008. Infants were categorized based on diagnosis (very preterm, congenital anomalies or other) and level of stability. Primary outcome was level of clinical service provided at end of life (care withheld, care withdrawn or full resuscitation).

Result:

From 1999 to 2008, there were 414 deaths in the NICU. Congenital anomaly was the leading diagnosis at the time of death, representing 45% of all deaths. Comparing mode of death, very preterm newborns were more likely than infants with congenital anomalies to have received cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at the time of death (26% vs 13%, P<0.01) and were significantly more unstable (75% vs 52%, P<0.01). Infants aged 22 to 24 weeks were mostly unstable and significantly more likely to receive CPR than infants with any other diagnosis.

Conclusion:

Over the 10-year period, very preterm infants were more likely to be physiologically unstable and to receive CPR at the time of death than infants with any other diagnosis. This finding was especially true for infants at the edge of viability (22 to 24 weeks). These differences in end-of-life care suggest that the quality of life and medical futility may be viewed differently for the least mature infants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weiner J, Sharma J, Kilbride H, Lantos J . How infants die in the neonatal intensive care unit: trends from 1999 through 2008. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011; 165 (7): 630–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hagen C, Hansen T . Deaths in a neonatal intensive care unit: a 10-year perspective. Ped Crit Care Med 2004; 5 (5): 463–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barton L, Hodgman J . The contribution of withholding or withdrawing care to newborn mortality. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 1487–1491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Verhagen AA, Janvier A, Leuthner S, Andrews B, Lagatta J, Bos AF et alCategorizing neonatal deaths: a cross-cultural study in the United States, Canada, and The Netherlands. J Pediatr 2010; 07: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adams-Chapman I, Hansen N, Shankaran S, Bell E, Boghossian N, Murray J et alTen year review of major birth defects in VLBW infants. Pediatrics 2013; 132: 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stoll B, Hansen N, Bell E, Shankaran S, Laptook A, Walsh M et alNeonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2010; 126: 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Costloe K, Hennessy E, Gibson AT, Marlow N, Wilkinson AR . for the EPICure Study Group. The EPICure Study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 659–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saigal S, Rosenbaum PT, Feeny D, Burrows E . Parental perspectives of the health status and health-related quality of life of teen-aged children who were extremely low birthweight and term controls. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 569–574.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Saigal S, Hoult LA, Streiner DL . School difficulties at adolescence in a regional cohort of children who were extremely low birthweight. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 325–331.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell M, Samara M . Neurologic and developmental diability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 9–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pierucci RL, Kirby RS, Leuthner SR . End-of-life care for neonates and infants: the experience and effects of a palliative care consultation service. Pediatrics 2001; 108 (3): 653–660.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Institute of Medicine. Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 1997.

  13. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL . The promise of a good death. Lancet 1998; 351 (2): SII21–SII29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leuthner SR, Pierucci RL . Experience with neonatal palliative care consultation at the Medical College of Wisconsin-Children's Hospital of Wisconsin. J Palliat Med 2001; 4: 39–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Noninitiation or withdrawal of intensive care for high-risk newborns. Pediatrics 2007; 119: 401–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shah PS . Extensive cardiopulmonary resuscitation for VLBW and ELBW infants: a systematic review and meta-analyses. J Perinatol 2009; 29 (10): 655–661.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kostelanetz AS, Dhanireddy R . Survival of the very-low-birth-weight infants after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2004; 24 (5): 279–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Catlin A . Transition from curative efforts to purely palliative care for neonates. Adv Neonatal Care 2011; 11 (3): 216–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Catlin A . Extremely long hospitalizations of newborns in the United States: data, descriptions, dilemmas. J Perinatol 2006; 26: 742–748.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation at an extremely low gestational age. Pediatrics 2009; 124 (1): 422–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh J, Fanaroff J, Andrews B, Caldarelli L, Lagatta J, Plesha-Troyke S et al. Resuscitation in the ‘Gray Zone’ of viability: determining physician preferences and predicting infant outcomes. Pediatrics 2007; 120 (3): 519–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh J, Lantos J, Meadow W . End-of-life after birth: death and dying in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 1620–1626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Campbell DE, Fleischman AR . Limits of viability: dilemmas, decisions, and decision makers. A J Perinatol 2001; 18 (3): 117–128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neonatology, Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, University of Missouri—Kansas City, School of Medicine, Kansas, MO, USA

    J Weiner, J Sharma & H Kilbride

  2. Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics Bioethics Center, University of Missouri—Kansas City, School of Medicine, Kansas, MO, USA

    J Lantos

Authors
  1. J Weiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J Lantos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H Kilbride
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Weiner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weiner, J., Sharma, J., Lantos, J. et al. Does diagnosis influence end-of-life decisions in the neonatal intensive care unit?. J Perinatol 35, 151–154 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.170

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.170

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links