Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Does adopting a prenatal substance use protocol reduce racial disparities in CPS reporting related to maternal drug use? A California case study

Abstract

Objective:

This study examined whether adopting a standardized prenatal substance use protocol (protocol) in a hospital labor and delivery unit reduced racial disparities in reporting to child protective services (CPS) related to maternal drug use during pregnancy.

Study design:

This study used an interrupted time series design with a non-equivalent control. One hospital adopted a protocol and another hospital group serving a similar geographic population did not change protocols. Data on CPS reporting disparities from these hospitals over 3.5 years were analyzed using segmented regression.

Result:

In the hospital that adopted the protocol, almost five times more black than white newborns were reported during the study period. Adopting the protocol was not associated with reduced disparities.

Conclusion:

Adopting a protocol cannot be assumed to reduce CPS reporting disparities. Efforts to encourage hospitals to adopt protocols as a strategy to reduce disparities may be misguided. Other strategies to reduce disparities are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neuspiel DR, Zingman TM, Templeton VH, DiStabile P Drucker E . Custody of cocaine-exposed newborns: determinants of discharge decisions. Am J Public Health 1993; 83 (12): 1726–1729.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chasnoff IJ, Landress HJ Barrett ME . The prevalence of illicit-drug or alcohol use during pregnancy and discrepancies in mandatory reporting in Pinellas County, Florida. N Engl J Med 1990; 322 (17): 1202–1206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roberts SC, Nuru-Jeter A . Universal screening for alcohol and drug use and racial disparities in child protective services reporting. J Behav Health Serv Res 2012; 39 (1): 3–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Osterling KL, D’Andrade A, Austin MJ . Understanding and addressing racial/ethnic disproportionality in the front end of the child welfare system. J Evid Based Soc Work 2008; 5 (1-2): 9–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nair P, Schuler ME, Black MM, Kettinger L, Harrington D . Cumulative environmental risk in substance abusing women: early intervention, parenting stress, child abuse potential and child development. Child Abuse Negl 2003; 27 (9): 997–1017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mikton C, Butchart A . Child maltreatment prevention: a systematic review of reviews. Bull World Health Organ 2009; 87 (5): 353–361.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. McCann KJ, Twomey JE, Caldwell D, Soave R, Fontaine LA, Lester BM . Services used by perinatal substance-users with child welfare involvement: a descriptive study. Harm Reduct J 2010; 7: 19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jansson LM, Svikis DS, Beilenson P . Effectiveness of child case management services for offspring of drug-dependent women. Subst Use Misuse 2003; 38 (14): 1933–1952.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roberts SC, Pies C . Complex calculations: how drug use during pregnancy becomes a barrier to prenatal care. Matern Child Health J 2011; 15 (3): 333–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. PSAP. Making Change Happen: A Year in Review. http://cchealth.org/psap/pdf/2008_annual_report.pdf. CCHS (ed). Perinatal Substance Abuse Partnership: Martinez, CA, 2008.

  11. Drescher-Burke K, Price A . Identifying, Reporting, and Responding to Substance Exposed Newborns: An Exploratory Study of Policies and Practices. National Abandoned Infants Assistance Resource Center, University of California at Berkeley: Berkeley, CA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. California Department of Alcohol and Drug Problems. Fact Sheet: Substance Exposed Infants (Senate Bill 2669) 2006.

  13. Albert V, Klein D, Noble A, Zahnd E, Holtby S . Identifying substance abusing delivering women: consequences for child maltreatment reports. Child Abuse Negl 2000; 24 (2): 173–183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zellman GL, Fair C, Hoube J, Wong M . A search for guidance: examining prenatal substance exposure protocols. Matern Child Health J 2002; 6 (3): 205–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ellsworth MA, Stevens TP, D’Angio CT . Infant race affects application of clinical guidelines when screening for drugs of abuse in newborns. Pediatrics 2010; 125 (6): e1379–e1385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Keppel K, Bilheimer L, Gurley L . Improving population health and reducing health care disparities. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007; 26 (5): 1281–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts SC, Nuru-Jeter A . Universal alcohol/drug screening in prenatal care: a strategy for reducing racial disparities? Questioning the assumptions. Matern Child Health J 2011; 15 (8): 1127–1134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oral R, Strang T . Neonatal illicit drug screening practices in Iowa: the impact of utilization of a structured screening protocol. J Perinatol 2006; 26 (11): 660–666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT . Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin Company: New York, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hospital protocol for evaluating and reporting cases involving prenatal drug/alcohol exposure. Retrieved on 6 February 2014 from http://ican4kids.org/documents/CANProtocol/ap15.Hospital.pdf. Los Angeles, CA, 2009.

  21. Census US. 2012 Community Survey 1-Year Estimates. Retrieved on 16 July 2014 from http://www.census.gov/acs/www/.

  22. Harper S, Lynch J, Meersman SC, Breen N, Davis WW, Reichman ME . An overview of methods for monitoring social disparities in cancer with an example using trends in lung cancer incidence by area-socioeconomic position and race-ethnicity, 1992-2004. Am J Epidemiol 2008; 167 (8): 889–899.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wagner AK, Soumerai SB, Zhang F, Ross-Degnan D . Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research. J Clin Pharm Ther 2002; 27 (4): 299–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang F, Wagner AK, Ross-Degnan D . Simulation-based power calculation for designing interrupted time series analyses of health policy interventions. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64 (11): 1252–1261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Roberts DE . Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare. Basic Books: New York, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Martin JA . Preterm births—United States, 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011; 60 (01): 78–79.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Alexander GR, Kogan MD, Nabukera S . Racial differences in prenatal care use in the United States: are disparities decreasing? Am J Public Health 2002; 92 (12): 1970–1975.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Roberts DE . Killing the black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. Vintage: New York, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  29. MacMahon JR . Perinatal substance abuse: the impact of reporting infants to Child Protective Services. Pediatrics 1997; 100 (5): E1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Roberts SC . Re-contextualizing Universal Screening for Alcohol and Drug Use in Prenatal Care: The (Not So) Hidden Connections Between Universal Screening and Reporting to Child Protective Services. University of California, Berkeley: Berkeley, CA, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kerker BD, Horwitz SM, Leventhal JM . Patients’ characteristics and providers’ attitudes: predictors of screening pregnant women for illicit substance use. Child Abuse Negl 2004; 28 (2): 209–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kerker BD, Leventhal JM, Schlesinger M, Horwitz SM . Racial and ethnic disparities in medical history taking: detecting substance use among low-income pregnant women. Ethn Dis 2006; 16 (1): 28–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Petrini J, Damus K, Roy S, Johnson K Johnston RB Jr . The effect of using ‘race of child’ instead of ‘race of mother’ on the black-white gap in infant mortality due to birth defects. Public Health Rep 1998; 113 (3): 263–267.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the University of California, San Francisco’s Academic Senate Committee on Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S C M Roberts.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roberts, S., Zahnd, E., Sufrin, C. et al. Does adopting a prenatal substance use protocol reduce racial disparities in CPS reporting related to maternal drug use? A California case study. J Perinatol 35, 146–150 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.168

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.168

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links