Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Frequency-modulated orocutaneous stimulation promotes non-nutritive suck development in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome or chronic lung disease

Abstract

Objective:

For the premature infant, extrauterine life is a pathological condition, which greatly amplifies the challenges to the brain in establishing functional oromotor behaviors. The extent to which suck can be entrained using a synthetically patterned orocutaneous input to promote its development in preterm infants who manifest chronic lung disease (CLD) is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of a frequency-modulated (FM) orocutaneous pulse train delivered through a pneumatically charged pacifier capable of enhancing non-nutritive suck (NNS) activity in tube-fed premature infants.

Study Design:

A randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of pneumatic orocutaneous stimulation 3 × per day on NNS development and length of stay (LOS) in the neonatal intensive care unit among 160 newborn infants distributed among three sub-populations, including healthy preterm infants, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and CLD. Study infants received a regimen of orocutaneous pulse trains through a PULSED pressurized silicone pacifier or a SHAM control (blind pacifier) during gavage feeds for up to 10 days.

Result:

Mixed modeling, adjusted for the infant’s gender, gestational age, postmenstrual age and birth weight, was used to handle interdependency among repeated measures within subjects. A significant main effect for stimulation mode (SHAM pacifier vs PULSED orosensory) was found among preterm infants for NNS bursts per min (P=0.003), NNS events per min (P=0.033) and for total oral compressions per min (NNS+nonNNS) (P=0.016). Pairwise comparison of adjusted means using Bonferroni adjustment indicated RDS and CLD infants showed the most significant gains on these NNS performance indices. CLD infants in the treatment group showed significantly shorter LOS by an average of 2.5 days.

Conclusion:

FM PULSED orocutaneous pulse train stimuli delivered through a silicone pacifier are effective in facilitating NNS burst development in tube-fed RDS and CLD preterm infants, with an added benefit of reduced LOS for CLD infants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lau C . Oral feeding in the preterm infant. Neoreviews 2006; 7: 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hack M, Estabrook MM, Robertson SS . Development of sucking rhythm in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev 1985; 11: 133–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mizuno K, Ueda A . Neonatal feeding performance as a predictor of neurodevelopmental outcome at 18 months. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005; 47: 299–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Medoff-Cooper B, Shults J, Kaplan J . Sucking behavior of preterm neonates as a predictor of developmental outcomes. J Dev Behav Pediatrics 2009; 30: 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DiPietro JA, Cusson RM, Caughy MO, Fox NA . Behavioral and physiologic effects of nonnutritive sucking during gavage feeding in preterm infants. Pediatr Res 1994; 36: 207–214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gill NE, Behnke M, Conlon M, Anderson GC . Nonnutritive sucking modulates behavioral state for preterm infants before feeding. Scand J Caring Sci 1992; 6: 3–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pickler RH, Frankel HB, Walsh KM, Thompson NM . Effects of nonnutritive sucking on behavioral organization and feeding performance in preterm infants. Nurs Res 1996; 45: 135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pickler RH, Higgins KE, Crummette BD . The effect of nonnutritive sucking on bottlefeeding stress in preterm infants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1993; 22: 230–234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Field T . Sucking for stress reduction, growth and development during infancy. Pediatric Basics 1993; 64: 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCain GC . Promotion of preterm infant nipple feeding with nonnutritive sucking. J Pediatr Nurs 1995; 10: 3–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pinelli J, Symington AJ . Non-nutritive sucking for promoting physiologic stability and nutrition in preterm infants. The Cochrane Collaboration, John Wiley & Sons. The Cochrane Library 2010; 6: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boiron M, Da Nobrega L, Roux S, Nenrot A, Saliba E . Effects of oral stimulation and oral support on non-nutritive sucking and feeding performance in preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007; 49: 439–444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Harding C . An evaluation of the benefits of non-nutritive sucking for premature infants as described in the literature. Arch Dis Child 2009; 94: 636–640.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pickler RH, Reyna B . Effects of non-nutritive sucking on nutritive sucking, breathing, and behavior during bottle feedings of preterm infants. Adv Neonatal Care 2004; 4: 226–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rocha AD, Moreira MEL, Pimenta HP, Ramos JRM, Lucena SL . A randomized study of the efficacy of sensory-motor-oral stimulation and non-nutritive sucking in very low birth weight infant. Early Hum Dev 2007; 83: 385–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bingham P, Ashikaga T, Abbasi S . Prospective study of non-nutritive sucking and feeding skills in premature infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010; 95: F194–F200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Als H . A manual for naturalistic observation of the newborn (preterm and full term infants) In: Goldson E (ed) Nurturing the Premature Infant, Developmental Interventions in the Neonatal Intensive Care Nursery. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995 pp 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  18. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT 9.2 User's Guide. SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 2002-2012.

  19. Penn AA, Shatz CJ . Brain waves and brain wiring: the role of endogenous and sensory-driven neural activity in development. Pediatr Res 1999; 45: 447–458.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Limperopoulos C, Gauvreau KK, O’Leary H, Moore M, Bassan H, Eichenwald EC et al. Cerebral hemodynamic changes during intensive care of preterm infants. Pediatrics 2008; 122: 1009–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Finan DS, Barlow SM . Mechanosensory modulation of non-nutritive sucking in human infants. Early Hum Dev 1998; 52: 181–197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zimmerman E, Barlow SM . Pacifier stiffness alters the dynamics of the suck central pattern generator. J Neonatal Nurs 2008; 14: 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oder A, Stalling D, Barlow SM . Effects of pacifier texture on NNS in neurotypical infants. Int J Pediatrics 2013; 2013: 168459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ihara Y, Nakayama K, Nakamura S, Mochizuki A, Takahashi K, Inoue T . Coordination of NMDA-induced rhythmic activity in the trigeminal and hypoglossal nerves of neonatal mice in vitro. Neurosci Res 2013; 75: 138–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ishihama K, Kogo M, Koizumi H, Nomura K, Tanaka S, Yamanishi T et al. Oral-motor patterns of rhythmic trigeminal activity generated in fetal rat brainstem in vitro. Dev Brain Res 2003; 145: 163–166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Barlow SM, Lund JP, Estep M., Kolta A . Central pattern generators for speech and orofacial activity In Brudzynski SM (eds.) Handbook of Mammalian Vocalization. Elsevier: Oxford, 2010 pp 351–370.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barlow SM, Urish M, Venkatesan L, Harold M, Zimmerman E . Frequency modulation (FM) and spatiotemporal stability of the sCPG in preterm infants with RDS. Int J Pediatrics 2012; 2012: 581538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bosma JF . Summarizing and perspective comments: Part V. Form and function in the infant’s mouth and pharynx In: Bosma JF (eds.) Second Symposium on Oral Sensation and Perception. Charles C Thomas: Springfield, IL, USA, 1970 pp 550–555.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fucile S, Gisel E, Lau C . Effect of an oral stimulation program on sucking skill maturation of preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005; 47: 158–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fucile S, Gisel EG, McFarland DH, Lau C . Oral and non-oral sensorimotor interventions enhance oral feeding performance in preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurology 2011; 53: 829–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fucile S, McFarland DH, Gisel EG, Lau C . Oral and nonoral sensorimotor interventions facilitate suck-swallow-respiration functions and their coordination in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev 2012; 88: 345–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gewolb IH, Vice FL . Abnormalities in the coordination of respiration and swallow in preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Dev Med Child Neurology 2006; 48: 595–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. White-Traut RC, Berbaum ML, Lessen B, McFarlin B, Cardenas L . Feeding readiness in preterm infants: the relationship between preterm behavioral state and feeding readiness behaviors and efficiency during transition from gavage to oral feeding. Am J Matern Child Nurs 2005; 30: 52–59.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Estep M, Barlow SM, Vantipalli R, Finan D, Lee J . Non-nutritive suck parameters in preterm infants with RDS. J Neonatal Nurs 2008; 14: 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bosma JF . Prologue to the symposium In: Bosma JF (ed) Fourth Symposium on Oral Sensation and Perception. Charles C Thomas: Bethesda, MD, USA, 1973 p 7.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shiao S-Y PK, Youngblut JM, Anderson GC, DiFiore JM, Martin RJ . Nasogastric tube placement: effects on breathing and sucking in very-low-birth-weight infants. Nurs Res 1995; 44: 82–88.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stumm S, Barlow SM, Estep M, Lee J, Cannon S, Gagnon K et al. The relation between respiratory distress syndrome and the fine structure of the non-nutritive suck in preterm infants. J Neonatal Nursing 2008; 14 (1): 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Song D, Jegatheesan P, Weiss S, Govindaswami B, Wang J, Lee J et al. Spectral edge frequency of EEG during patterned pneumatic oral stimulation in preterm infants. Pediatric Res 2013 doi:10.1038/pr.2013.179. (e-pub ahead of print) PMID:24129553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Barlow SM, Jegatheesan P, Weiss S, Govindaswami B, Wang J, Lee J et al. Amplitude-integrated EEG and range-EEG modulation associated with pneumatic orocutaneous stimulation in preterm infants. J Perinatology 2013 in press.

  40. Barlow SM, Finan DS, Chu S, Lee J . Patterns for the premature brain: synthetic orocutaneous stimulation entrains preterm infants with feeding difficulties to suck. J Perinatology 2008; 28: 541–548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants NIH R01 DC003311 (SM Barlow), NIH P30 HD02528 and the Sutherland Foundation. We express gratitude to Joy Carlson, NNP and Mimi Burch, MS, for clinical support in patient recruitment and data collection, Drs Meredith P Harold and Emily Zimmerman for experimental support, Kenny Aron for software technical support, and the scores of families who participated in this project. This paper is dedicated to Anna M Dusick, MD (1955 to 2012), an outstanding clinical scientist and neurodevelopmentalist, who encouraged the first author to pursue studies on oral sensorimotor development in the preterm infant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S M Barlow.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

None of the authors have a direct financial relation with the manufacturers of the Soothie pacifier, Honeywell Sensors, nor with the SAS statistical software. Dr Barlow is the inventor of the NTrainer System, which is registered and licensed by the University of Kansas to Innara Health, Incorporated (Olathe, KS, USA).

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Journal of Perinatology website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barlow, S., Lee, J., Wang, J. et al. Frequency-modulated orocutaneous stimulation promotes non-nutritive suck development in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome or chronic lung disease. J Perinatol 34, 136–142 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.149

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.149

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links