Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid parameters in preterm infants with intraventricular reservoirs

Abstract

Objective:

Intraventricular reservoirs (IVRs) are used to drain cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in neonates with post-hemorrhagic ventricular dilatation (PHVD). The objectives of this case–control study were to evaluate changes in CSF parameters in serial IVR taps and to compare CSF parameters in culture-positive and -negative specimens.

Study Design:

Clinical and laboratory data from serial (up to 7) reservoir taps at 5- to 8-day intervals were collected on preterm neonates with PHVD and IVR insertion.

Result:

The median (range) gestational age and birth weight of our cohort (n=52) was 26 (23 to 33) weeks and 796 (450 to 1620) grams. Significant decreases in percentage of CSF neutrophils and protein were noted in later taps, compared with the first tap at insertion of IVR. Five (9.6%) infants had positive CSF cultures on 10 occasions. Compared with negative specimens (n=266), the mean (s.d.) proportion of neutrophils in CSF (55% (33) vs 26% (23)) was significantly higher and ratio of CSF to serum glucose significantly lower (0.19 (0.08) vs 0.29 (0.13)) in culture-positive specimens (n=10). The area under the curve was 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 0.93) for CSF white blood cell (WBC) count, 0.79 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.90) for CSF protein and 0.75 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.95) for percentage of neutrophils. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosis of infection was 90 and 63% for CSF WBC count > 42 mm–3, 89 and 58% for CSF protein at > 250 mg dl–1 and 80 and 67% for CSF neutrophil proportion >31.5%.

Conclusion:

CSF parameters from IVR taps, specifically proportion of neutrophils and proteins are higher at insertion and progressively normalize over time. Although they vary widely, CSF WBC, protein and neutrophil proportion using higher cut-off values have good sensitivity in the diagnosis of infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Persson EK, Hagberg G, Uvebrant P . Hydrocephalus prevalence and outcome in a population-based cohort of children born in 1989–1998. Acta Paediatr 2005; 94: 726–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Whitelaw A, Cherian S, Thoresen M, Pople I . Posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation: new mechanics and new treatment. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2004; 444: 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Murphy BP, Inder TE, Rooks V, Taylor GA, Anderson NJ, Mogridge N et al. Posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation in the preterm infant: natural history and predictors of outcome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2002; 87: F37–F41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dykes FD, Dunbar B, Lazarra A, Ahmann PA . hydrocephalus in high-risk preterm infants: natural history, management, and long-term outcome. J Pediatr 1989; 114: 611–618.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams-Chapman I, Hansen NI, Stoll BJ, Higgins R, NICHD Research Network. Neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely low birth weight infants with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus requiring shunt insertion. Pediatrics 2008; 2: e1167–e1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Resch B, Gedermann A, Maurer U, Ritschl E, Müller W . Neurodevelopmental outcome of hydrocephalus following intra-/periventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants: short- and long-term results. Childs Nerv Syst 1996; 12: 27–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shooman D, Portess H, Sparrow O . A review of the current treatment methods for posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus of infants. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2009; 6: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Whitelaw A, Kennedy CR, Brion LP . Diuretic therapy for newborn infants with posthemorrhagic ventricular dilatation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; 2: CD002270.

    Google Scholar 

  9. International PHVD Drug Trial Group. International randomized controlled trial of acetazolamide and furosemide in posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation in infancy. Lancet 1998; 352: 433–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hudgins RJ, Boydston WR, Gilreath CL . Treatment of posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in the preterm infant with a ventricular access device. Pediatr Neurosurg 1998; 29: 309–313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaskill SJ, Marlin AE, Rivera S . The subcutaneous ventricular reservoir: an effective treatment for posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 1988; 4: 291–295.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Richard E, Cinalli G, Assis D, Pierre-Kahn A, Lacaze-Masmonteil T . Treatment of post-haemorrhage ventricular dilatation with an Ommaya′s reservoir: management and outcome of 64 preterm infants. Childs Nerv Syst 200; 17: 334–340.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brouwer AJ, Groenendaal F, van den Hoogen A, Verboon-Maciolek M, Hanlo P, Rademaker KJ et al. Incidence of infections of ventricular reservoirs in the treatment of post-haemorrhagic ventricular dilatation: a retrospective study (1992–2003). Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007; 92: F41–F43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lenfestey RW, Smith PB, Moody MA, Clark RH, Cotten CM, Seed PC et al. Predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid parameters in neonates with intraventricular drainage devices. J Neurosurg 2007; 107: 209–212.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H . Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage:a study of infants with birth weights less than 1500 gm. J Pediatr 1978; 92: 529–534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Berman RE, Kliegman RM, Arvin AM . Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 17th edn WB Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oski FA . Principles and Practice of Pediatrics. 2nd edn. JB Lippincott: Philadelphia, PA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmed A, Hickey SM, Ehrett S, llo M, Brito F, Goto C et al. Cerebrospinal fluid values in the term neonate. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1996; 15: 298–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Garges HP, Moody MA, Cotten CM, Smith PB, Tiffany KF, Lenfestey R et al. Neonatal meningitis: what is the correlation among cerebrospinal fluid cultures, blood cultures, and cerebrospinal fluid parameters? Pediatrics 2006; 117: 1094–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wiswell TE, Baumgart S, Gannon CM, Spitzer AR . No lumbar puncture in the evaluation for early neonatal sepsis: will meningitis be missed? Pediatrics 1995; 119: 803–806.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA et al. To tap or not to tap: high likelihood of meningitis without sepsis among very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 1181–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baumeister FA, Pohl-Koppe A, Hofer M, Kim JO, Weiss M . IL-6 in CSF during ventriculitis in preterm infants with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Infection 2000; 28: 234–236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Scribano PV, Pool S, Smally AJ . Comparison of ventriculoperitoneal shunt tap and lumbar puncture in a child with meningitis. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18: E1–E3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr Seetha Shankaran for her guidance in the preparation of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Bajaj.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bajaj, M., Lulic-Botica, M. & Natarajan, G. Evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid parameters in preterm infants with intraventricular reservoirs. J Perinatol 32, 786–790 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2011.190

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2011.190

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links