Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Improved outcomes with a standardized feeding protocol for very low birth weight infants

Abstract

Objective:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a standardized enteral feeding protocol for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants on nutritional, clinical and growth outcomes.

Study Design:

Retrospective analysis of VLBW cohorts 9 months before and after initiation of a standardized feeding protocol consisting of 6–8 days of trophic feedings, followed by an increase of 20 ml/kg/day. The primary outcome was days to reach full enteral feeds defined as 160 ml/kg/day. Secondary outcomes included rates of necrotizing enterocolitis and culture-proven sepsis, days of parenteral nutrition and growth end points.

Result:

Data were analyzed on 147 VLBW infants who received enteral feedings, 83 before (‘Before’) and 64 subsequent to (‘After’) feeding protocol initiation. Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants in the After group attained enteral volumes of 120 ml/kg/day (43.9 days Before vs 32.8 days After, P=0.02) and 160 ml/kg/day (48.5 days Before vs 35.8 days After, P=0.02) significantly faster and received significantly fewer days of parenteral nutrition (46.2 days Before vs 31.3 days After, P=0.01). Necrotizing enterocolitis decreased in the After group among VLBW (15/83, 18% Before vs 2/64, 3% After, P=0.005) and ELBW infants (11/31, 35% Before vs 2/26, 8% After, P=0.01). Late-onset sepsis decreased significantly in the After group (26/83, 31% Before vs 6/64, 9% After, P=0.001). Excluding those with weight <3rd percentile at birth, the proportion with weight <3rd percentile at discharge decreased significantly after protocol initiation (35% Before vs 17% After, P=0.03).

Conclusion:

These data suggest that implementation of a standardized feeding protocol for VLBW infants results in earlier successful enteral feeding without increased rates of major morbidities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clark RH, Thomas P, Peabody J . Extrauterine growth restriction remains a serious problem in prematurely born neonates. Pediatrics 2003; 111: 986–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lemons J, Bauer C, Oh W, Korones S, Papile L, Stoll B et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1995 through December 1996. NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2001; 107: e1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ehrenkranz RA, Younes N, Lemons JA, Fanaroff AA, Donovan EF, Wright LL et al. Longitudinal growth of hospitalized very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1999; 104: 280–289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lucas A, Morley R, Cole TJ . Randomised trial of early diet in preterm babies and later intelligence quotient. BMJ 1998; 317: 1481–1487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ehrenkranz RA, Dusick AM, Vohr BR, Wright LL, Wrage LA, Poole WK . Growth in the neonatal intensive care unit influences neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 1253–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Franz AR, Pohlandt F, Bode H, Mihatsch WA, Sander S, Kron M et al. Intrauterine, early neonatal, and postdischarge growth and neurodevelopmental outcome at 5.4 years in extremely preterm infants after intensive neonatal nutritional support. Pediatrics 2009; 123: e101–e109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Patole S . Strategies for prevention of feed intolerance in preterm neonates: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 18 (1): 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Flidel-Rimon O, Branski D, Shinwell ES . The fear of necrotizing enterocolitis versus achieving optimal growth in preterm infants—an opinion. Acta Paediatr 2006; 95 (11): 1341–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuzma-O’Reilly B, Duenas ML, Greecher C, Kimberlin L, Mujsce D, Miller D et al. Evaluation, development, and implementation of potentially better practices in neonatal intensive care nutrition. Pediatrics 2003; 111: e461–e470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Street JL, Montgomery D, Alder SC, Lambert DK, Gerstmann DR, Christensen RD . Implementing feeding guidelines for NICU patients &lt;2000 g results in less variability in nutrition outcomes. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2006; 30 (6): 515–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamitsuka MD, Horton MK, Williams MA . The incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis after introducing standardized feeding schedules for infants between 1250 and 2500 grams and less than 35 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 379–384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Patole SK, Kadalraja R, Tuladhar R, Almonte R, Muller R, Whitehall JS . Benefits of a standardised feeding regimen during a clinical trial in preterm neonates. Int J Clin Pract 2000; 54 (7): 429–431.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Premji S, Chessell L, Paes B, Pinelli J, Jacobson K . A matched cohort study of feeding practice guidelines for infants weighing less than 1,500 g. Adv Neonatal Care 2002; 2 (1): 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stark AR . Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 1341–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fenton TR . A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updated with recent data and a new format. BMC Pediatr 2003; 3: 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Walsh MC, Wilson-Costello D, Zadell A, Newman N, Fanaroff A . Safety, reliability, and validity of a physiologic definition of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Perinatol 2003; 23 (6): 451–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD, Keating JP, Marshall R, Barton L et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Ann Surg 1978; 187: 1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel AL, Engstrom JL, Meier PP, Kimura RE . Accuracy of methods for calculating postnatal growth velocity for extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 1466–1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patole SK, de Klerk N . Impact of standardised feeding regimens on incidence of neonatal necrotising enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90 (2): F147–F151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tyson JE, Kennedy KA . Trophic feedings for parenterally fed infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 3: CD000504.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bombell S, McGuire W . Early trophic feeding for very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 3: CD000504.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lucas A, Bloom SR, Aynsley-Green A . Gut hormones and ‘minimal enteral feeding’. Acta Paediatr Scand 1986; 75 (5): 719–723.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Berseth CL, Nordyke CK, Valdes MG, Furlow BL, Go VL . Responses of gastrointestinal peptides and motor activity to milk and water feedings in preterm and term infants. Pediatr Res 1992; 31 (6): 587–590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Meetze WH, Valentine C, McGuigan JE, Conlon M, Sacks N, Neu J . Gastrointestinal priming prior to full enteral nutrition in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1992; 15 (2): 163–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McClure R, Newell S . Randomized controlled study of digestive enzyme activity following trophic feeding. Acta Paediatr 2002; 91 (3): 292–296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McClure RJ, Newell SJ . Randomised controlled trial of trophic feeding and gut motility. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999; 80 (1): F54–F58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schanler RJ, Shulman RJ, Lau C . Feeding strategies for premature infants: beneficial outcomes of feeding fortified human milk versus preterm formula. Pediatrics 1999; 103: 1150–1157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sisk PM, Lovelady CA, Dillard RG, Gruber KJ, O’Shea TM . Early human milk feeding is associated with a lower risk of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 2007; 27 (7): 428–433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Quigley MA, Henderson G, Anthony MY, McGuire W . Formula milk versus donor breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 4: CD002971.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mathur NB, Dwarkadas AM, Sharma VK, Saha K, Jain N . Anti-infective factors in preterm human colostrum. Acta Paediatr Scand 1990; 79 (11): 1039–1044.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rodriguez NA, Meier PP, Groer MW, Zeller JM . Oropharyngeal administration of colostrum to extremely low birth weight infants: theoretical perspectives. J Perinatol 2009; 29 (1): 1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Johansen KL . Value of quality improvement reporting. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2 (6): 1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Berwick DM . The science of improvement. JAMA 2008; 299 (10): 1182–1184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by a Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health Innovations in Patient Care Grant. This project (HCL) was supported by NIH/NCRR/OD UCSF-CTSI Grant Number KL2 RR024130. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. We thank Aimee Ralston, BA, for her assistance in data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K R McCallie.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

SH has received Advisory Board payments from Genentech for the Joint Pregnancy Registry, Raptiva and Xolair.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCallie, K., Lee, H., Mayer, O. et al. Improved outcomes with a standardized feeding protocol for very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 31 (Suppl 1), S61–S67 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.185

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.185

Keywords

Search

Quick links