Review

Journal of Perinatology (2009) 29, S68–S72; doi:10.1038/jp.2009.28

To tube or not to tube babies with respiratory distress syndrome

K C Sekar1 and K E Corff1

1Department of Pediatrics, Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Infant Breathing Disorders Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA

Correspondence: Dr KC Sekar, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Children's Hospital, 1200 Everett Drive, 7th Floor North Pavilion, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA. E-mail: kris-sekar@ouhsc.edu

Top

Abstract

The use of mechanical ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and respiratory failure often results in barotrauma, volutrauma and chronic lung disease (CLD). Research indicates that early surfactant therapy and initiation of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for these infants significantly reduces the need for mechanical ventilation and the incidence of CLD. Different CPAP delivery systems exist, each with some practical and clinical advantages and disadvantages. Clinical trials indicate that optimal management of neonatal RDS could be improved by early surfactant treatment followed immediately by extubation and stabilization on CPAP. Evidence suggests a synergistic effect between early surfactant administration (within 2 h of birth) and rapid extubation to nasal CPAP with a significant reduction in the need for mechanical ventilation and its associated morbidities.

Keywords:

continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), premature infant, respiratory distress syndrome, surfactant, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, chronic lung disease

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

Extra navigation

.

naturejobs

ADVERTISEMENT