Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Patterns of pregnancy exposure to prescription FDA C, D and X drugs in a Canadian population

Abstract

Objective:

To examine prescription Food and Drug Administration (FDA) C, D and X drugs in general obstetric population.

Study Design:

Historical cohort study.

Result:

A total of 18 575 women who gave a birth in Saskatchewan between January 1997 and December 2000 were included. Among them, 3604 (19.4%) received FDA C, D or X drugs at least once during pregnancy. The pregnancy exposure rates were 15.8, 5.2 and 3.9%, respectively, for category C, D and X drugs, and were 11.2, 7.3 and 8.2%, respectively, in the first, second and third trimesters. Salbutamol (albuterol), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole), ibuprofen, naproxen and oral contraceptives were the most common C, D, X drugs used during pregnancy.

Conclusion:

About one in every five women uses FDA C, D and X drugs at least once during pregnancy, and the most common prescription drugs in pregnancy are antiasthmatic, antibiotics, nonsteroid anti-inflammation drugs, antianxiety or antidepressants and oral contraceptives.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rajkumar SV . Thalidomide: tragic past and promising future. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79: 899–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lagoy CT, Joshi N, Cragan JD, Rasmussen SA . Use during pregnancy and lactation: an urgent call for public health action. J Womens Health 2005; 14: 104–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Food and Drug Administration. Requirements on content and format of labeling for human prescription drug and biological products. Fed Regist 2006; 71: 3921–3997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wen SW, Yang Q, Garner P, Fraser W, Olatunbosun O, Nimrod C et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 961–966.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Von Korff M, Wagner EH, Saunders K . A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 197–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee E, Maneno MK, Smith L, Weiss SR, Zuckerman IH, Wutoh AK et al. National patterns of medication use during pregnancy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2006; 15: 537–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Andrade SE, Gurwitz JH, Davis RL, Chan KA, Finkelstein JA, Fortman K et al. Prescription drug use in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 398–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Andrade SE, Raebel MA, Morse AN, Davis RL, Chan KA, Finkelstein JA et al. Use of prescription medications with a potential for fetal harm among pregnant women. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2006; 15: 546–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper WO, Hickson GB, Ray WA . Prescriptions for contraindicated category X drugs in pregnancy among women enrolled in TennCare. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2004; 18: 106–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Malm H, Martikainen J, Klaukka T, Neuvonen P . Prescription of hazardous drugs during pregnancy. Drug Saf 2004; 27: 899–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lacroix I, Damase-Michel C, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Montastruc JL . Prescription of drugs during pregnancy in France. Lancet 2000; 356: 1735–1736.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bakker MK, Jentink J, Vroom F, Van Den Berg PB, De Walle HE, De Jong-Van Den Berg LT . Drug prescription patterns before, during and after pregnancy for chronic, occasional and pregnancy-related drugs in the Netherlands. BJOG 2006; 113: 559–568.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Riley EH, Fuentes-Afflick E, Jackson RA, Escobar GJ, Brawarsky P, Schreiber M et al. Correlates of prescription drug use during pregnancy. J Womens Health 2005; 14: 401–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hardy JR, Leaderer BP, Holford TR, Hall GC, Bracken MB . Safety of medications prescribed before and during early pregnancy in a cohort of 81975 mothers from the UK General Practice Research Database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2006; 15: 555–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Olesen C, Sprensen HT, de Jong-van-den Berg L, Olsen J, Steffensen FH . Prescribing during pregnancy and lactation with reference to the Swedish classification system. A population-based study among Danish women. The GuromaysEuromap Group. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 686–692.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Garriguet D . Medication use among pregnant women. Health Rep 2006; 17: 9–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams JI, Young W . A summary on the quality of health care administrative databases in Canada. In: Goel V, Williams JI, Anderson GM, Blackstien-Hirsch P, Fooks C, Naylor CD (eds). Patterns of Health Care in Ontario. The ICES Practice Atlas, 2nd edn. Canadian Medical Association: Ottawa, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schieve LA, Handler A, Hershow R, Persky V, Davis F . Urinary tract infection during pregnancy: its association with maternal morbidity and perinatal outcome. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 405–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Masters PA, O'Bryan TA, Zurlo J, Miller D, Joshi N . Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole revisited. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 402–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wen SW, Walker M . Risk of fetal exposure to folic acid antagonists. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2004; 26: 475–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hernández-Díaz S, Werler MM, Walker AM, Mitchell AA . Folic acid antagonists during pregnancy and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1608–1614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wen SW, Demissie KW, Liu S . Adverse outcomes in pregnancies of asthmatic women: results from a Canadian population. Ann Epidemiol 2001; 11: 7–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Demissie K, Breckenridge MB, Rhoads GG . Infant and maternal outcomes in the pregnancies of asthmatic women. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 158: 1091–1095.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Källén B, Otterblad Olausson P . Use of anti-asthmatic drugs during pregnancy 3. Congenital malformations in the infants. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 63: 383–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Henshaw SK . Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plan Perspect 1998; 30: 24–29, 46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Foster DG, Bley J, Mikanda J, Induni M, Arons A, Baumrind N et al. Contraceptive use and risk of unintended pregnancy in California. Contraception 2004; 70: 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Glei DA . Measuring contraceptive use patterns among teenage and adult women. Fam Plan Perspect 1999; 31: 73–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported, in part, by a grant from Physicians Services Incorporated (grant no. PSI 02-23), a Research Allowance from The Canadian Institutes for Health Research (SWW) and Ontario Premier's Award for Research Excellence (SWW). Drs SW Wen and MC Walker are recipients of New Investigator's Award from the Canadian Institute of Health Research. Dr D Krewski is the NSERC/SSHRC/McLaughlin Research Chair in Population Health Risk Assessment. This study was based on nonidentifiable data provided by the Saskatchewan Department of Health. The interpretation and conclusions contained herein do not necessarily represent those of the Government of Saskatchewan or the Saskatchewan Department of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S W Wen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wen, S., Yang, T., Krewski, D. et al. Patterns of pregnancy exposure to prescription FDA C, D and X drugs in a Canadian population. J Perinatol 28, 324–329 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.6

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links