Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

How did formative research inform the development of a home-based neonatal care intervention in rural Ghana?

Abstract

Formative research is often used to inform intervention design, but the design process is rarely reported. This study describes how an integrated home visit intervention for newborns in Ghana was designed. As a first step in the design process, the known intervention parameters were listed, information required to refine the intervention was then identified and a formative research strategy designed. The strategy included synthesizing available data, collecting data on newborn care practices in homes and facilities, on barriers and facilitators to adopting desired behaviors and on practical issues such as whom to include in the intervention. The data were used to develop an intervention plan through workshops with national and international stakeholders and experts. The intervention plan was operationalized by district level committees. This included developing work plans, a creative brief for the materials and completing a community volunteer inventory. The intervention was then piloted and the intervention materials were finalized. The design process took over a year and was iterative. Throughout the process, literature was reviewed to identify the best practice. The intervention focuses on birth preparedness, using treated bednets in pregnancy, early and exclusive breastfeeding, thermal care, special care for small babies and prompt care seeking for newborns with danger signs. The need for a problem-solving approach was identified to help ensure behavior change. A subset of behaviors were already being performed adequately, or were the focus of other interventions, but were important to reinforce in the visits. These include attending antenatal care and care seeking for danger signs in pregnancy. On the basis of the intervention content, the timing of newborn deaths and the acceptability of visits, two antenatal and three visits in the first week of life (days 1, 3 and 7) were planned. Several household members were identified to include in the visits as they were involved in newborn care or they made financial decisions. Birth attendants and health workers were often the locus of control for immediate newborn care, and sensitization activities were designed to improve their practices and to help ensure that families received consistent messages. An existing cadre of community volunteers was identified to deliver the intervention—these volunteers were already trusted and accepted by the community, already visited pregnant women at home and had the time and commitment to deliver the intervention. A supervision and remuneration system was developed through discussions with the volunteers and at the planning workshops. The need for community entry activities was identified to garner community support for the intervention, to encourage self-identification of pregnant and delivered women and to motivate the volunteer through community recognition. Formative research is an essential step in helping to ensure the development of an effective, appropriate and sustainable intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA, Cousens S, Adam T, Walker N, de Bernis L, Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? Lancet 2005; 365: 977–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization. Mother-Baby Package: Implementing Safe Motherhood in Countries. WHO: Geneva, 1994, pp 1–15.

  3. World Health Organization. Essential Newborn Care: Report of a Technical Working Group 1994. WHO: Geneva, 1996.

  4. Bang A, Reddy M, Deshmukh M . Child mortality in Maharashtra. Econ Polit Wkly 2002; 37: 4947–4965.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bang AT, Bang RA, Baitule SB, Reddy MH, Deshmukh MD . Effect of home-based neonatal care and management of sepsis on neonatal mortality: field trial in rural India. Lancet 1999; 354: 1955–1961.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baqui AH, El-Arifeen S, Darmstadt GL, Ahmed S, Williams EK, Seraji HR et al. Effect of community-based newborn-care intervention package implemented through two service-delivery strategies in Sylhet district, Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008; 371: 1936–1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. UNICEF. Training of Trainers Course on Community-based Maternal and Newborn Care. UNICEF: Nairobi, 2007.

  8. Knippenberg R, Lawn JE, Darmstadt GL, Begkoyian G, Fogstad H, Walelign N et al. Systematic scaling up of neonatal care in countries. Lancet 2005; 365: 1087–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Sullivan GA, Yonkler JA, Morgan W, Merritt AP . A Field Guide to Designing A Health Communication Strategy. A Resource for Health Communication Professionals. Johns Hopkins: Baltimore, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jimerson A, Rosenbaum J, Middlestadt S, Schneider A, Strand J, Mitchel P et al. Applying the BEHAVE FRamework: A Workshop on Strategic Planning for Behavior Change. CORE: Washington, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. INFO project. Tools for behavior change communication. Info Reports 2008; 16: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. World Health organization. Child Health in the Community: ‘Community IMCI’. Briefing Package for Facilitators. WHO: Geneva, 2004.

  13. Bhutta ZA, Darmstadt GL, Hasan BS, Haws RA . Community-based interventions for improving perinatal and neonatal health outcomes in developing countries: a review of the evidence. Pediatrics 2005; 115 (Suppl): 519–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beck D, Ganges F, Goldman S, Long P . Care of the Newborn, Reference manual. Saving Newborn Lives: New York, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bhattacharyya K, Winch P, LeBan K, Tien M . Community Health Worker Incentives and Disincentives: How They Affect Motivation, Retention, and Sustainability. BASICS II: Virginia, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. IPPF International Planned Parenthood Federation. Training Skills for Health Professionals. IPPF: London, 2006.

  17. Blouse A . Training Works. JHPIEGO: Baltimore, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization. Training Course for the 100% Condom Use Programme. WHO: Geneva, 2002.

  19. World Health Organization. Breastfeeding Counseling: A Training course. WHO: Geneva, 1999.

  20. World Health Organization. Guidelines for Follow-up after Training in the WHO/UNICEF course on Integrated Management of Childhood Illness for First-Level Health Workers: Supervisor's Guide. WHO: Geneva, 1999.

  21. UNICEF. Home Based Care for Mothers and Newborns: A Facilitator's Guide for Training Community Health Workers. UNICEF: New York, 2008.

  22. Armbruster D, Beck D, Goldman S, Long P . Care of the Newborn Training Guide. Save the Children: New York, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mannof. Trials of Improved Practices (TIPs): Giving Participants a Voice in Program Design 2006. Available at: http://www.manoffgroup.com/resources/summaromytips.pdf.

  24. Tawiah-Agyemang C, Kirkwood BR, Edmond K, Bazzano A, Hill Z . Early initiation of breastfeeding in Ghana: barriers and facilitators. 2008; 28 (Suppl 2): S46–S52.

  25. FHI. Behavior Change—A Summary of Four Major Theories. FHI: Arlington, 2002.

  26. Bazzano AN, Kirkwood BR, Tawiah-Agyemang C, Owusu-Agyei S, Adongo PB . Beyond symptom recognition: care-seeking for ill newborns in rural Ghana. Trop Med Int Health 2008; 13: 123–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. UNICEF. Monitoring Progress toward the Goals of the World Summit for Children: End-Decade Multiple Indicator Survey Manual. UNICEF: New York, 2000.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Newhints study is supported by the World Health Organization, Saving Newborn Lives and DFID. We thank all of those who participated in the formative research and all the members of the intervention planning workshop and subsequent workshops. We also thank Drs Rajiv Bahl and Steve Wall for their technical input.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z Hill.

Additional information

Disclosure

Betty R Kirkwood has received grant support from DFID, USAID, Saving Newborn Lives and WHO. Betty R Kirkwood has also participated in the Vikram Patel Welcome Trust Senior Clinical Research Fellowship in Tropical Medicine and the Dominique Behague Welcome Trust Research Development Fellowship. Zelee Hill has received consulting fees from the Gates Foundation. The remaining authors have no financial interests to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, Z., Manu, A., Tawiah-Agyemang, C. et al. How did formative research inform the development of a home-based neonatal care intervention in rural Ghana?. J Perinatol 28 (Suppl 2), S38–S45 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.172

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.172

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links