Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Clinical utility of fetal autopsy and comparison with prenatal ultrasound findings

Abstract

Objectives:

To present a comprehensive analysis of autopsy findings in 206 fetuses referred to our genetic center and to assess the clinical utility of fetal autopsy in reaching a final diagnosis, which is essential for counseling regarding the risk of recurrence. We also compared the autopsy findings with prenatal ultrasound findings to evaluate the potential benefit of fetal autopsy in fetuses terminated after prenatal diagnosis of malformations.

Study design:

Retrospective review of patient records in a tertiary referral genetic center in North India during 5-year period (April 2000–March 2005). This includes 206 fetuses, 138 terminated after detecting an anomaly in ultrasonogram and 68 spontaneous fetal losses. In all cases, fetal autopsy was carried out and complimented by radiography, karyotype wherever possible and histopathological examination wherever necessary. In fetuses with prenatally diagnosed malformations, ultrasound findings were compared with autopsy findings.

Results:

Fetal autopsy was able to provide a definite final diagnosis in 59% (122/206) cases. Fetal autopsy confirmed the ultrasound findings in all cases but two. Moreover, autopsy provided additional findings in 77 cases and of these, 24 cases had a significant change of recurrence risk.

Conclusion:

This study confirms the utility of fetal autopsy in identifying the cause of fetal loss, which will help in the genetic counseling of the couple. In cases with prenatally diagnosed anomalies, the new information from fetal autopsy changes the predicted probability of recurrence in 18% cases. Even though the prenatal ultrasonogram reasonably predicts the malformations, fetal autopsy gives significant additional malformations in one-third of the cases and is essential for genetic counseling.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Purchase on Springer Link

Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rajasekhar S, Vishnu Bhat B, Veliath AJ, Ratnakar C . Perinatal autopsy – a seven year study. Indian J Pediatr 1996; 63: 511–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Joshi VV, Bhakoo ON, Gopalan S, Gupta AN . Primary cause of perinatal mortality – autopsy study of 134 causes. Indian J Med Res 1979; 69: 963–971.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Muller RF, Young ID . Emery's Elements of Medical Genetics. Churchill Livingstone: New York, 2001; 1–193.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pahi J, Phadke SR, Halder A, Gupta A, Pandey R, Agarwal SS . Does autopsy of antenatally diagnosed malformed fetuses aid genetic counselling? Nat Med J India 1998; 11: 169–170.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Phadke SR . Perinatal pathology – a prerequisite for genetic counselling. Asian J Pediatr Pract 2004; 8: 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Curry CJ . Pregnancy loss, stillbirth and neonatal death. A guide for the Pediatrician. Medical Genetics-I. Pediatr Clin North Am 1992; 39: 36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oslen OE, Espeland A, Maartmann-Moe H, Lachman RS, Rosendahl K . Diagnostic value of radiography in cases of perinatal death: a population based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88: F521–F524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharma AK, Phadke SR, Kamboj M, Agarwal SS . The clinical value of a limited fetal autopsy as illustrated by 2 cases. Aus NZ J Obstetr Gynaecol 1994; 34: 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boyd PA, Tondi F, Hicks NR, Chamberlain PF . Autopsy after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2004; 328: 137–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Saller ND, Lesser BK, Harrel U, Rogers BB, Oyer CE . The clinical utility of the perinatal autopsy. JAMA 1995; 273: 663–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Steiner RD . Hydrops fetalis: role of the geneticist. Semin Perinatol 1995; 19: 516–524.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodriguez MM, Bruce JH, Jimenez XF, Romaguera RL, Bancalari E, Garcia OL et al. Nonimmune hydrops fetalis in the live born: series of 32 autopsies. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2005; 8: 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lallemand AV, Doco-Fenzy M, Galliard DA . Investigation of nonimmune hydrops fetalis: multidisciplinary studies are necessary for diagnosis – review of 94 cases. Pediatr Dev Pathol 1999; 2: 432–439.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Suwanrath-Kengpol C, Kor-anantakul O, Suntharasaj T, Leetanaporn R . Etiology and outcome of non-immune hydrops fetalis in southern Thailand. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2005; 59: 134–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burin MG, Scholz AP, Gus R, Sanseverino MT, Fritsh A, Magalhaes JA et al. Investigation of lysosomal storage diseases in nonimmune hydrops fetalis. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24: 653–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaiser L, Vizer M, Arany A, Vezpremi B . Correlation of prenatal clinical findings with those observed in fetal autopsies: pathological approach. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20: 970–975.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Phadke SR, Pahi J, Phadke RV, Pradhan S, agarwal SS . Importance of etiological diagnosis of hydrocephalus as illustrated by a case of Walker Warburg syndrome. Indian Pediatr 1997; 34: 1037–1038.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Johns N, Al-salti W, Cox P, Kilby MD . A comparative study of prenatal ultrasound findings and post-mortem examination in a tertiary referral center. Prenat Diag 2004; 24: 339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wright C, Lee REJ . Investigating perinatal death: a review of the options when autopsy consent is refused. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89: F285–F288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Griffiths PD, Variend D, Evans M, Jones A, Wilkinson ID, Paley MN et al. Postmortem MR imaging of the fetal and stillborn central nervous system. Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 22–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Griffiths PD, Paley MNJ, Whitby EH . Post-mortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal autopsy. Lancet 2005; 365: 1271–1273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S R Phadke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sankar, V., Phadke, S. Clinical utility of fetal autopsy and comparison with prenatal ultrasound findings. J Perinatol 26, 224–229 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211482

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211482

Keywords

Search

Quick links