Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Pregnant mothers out of the perinatal regionalization's reach

Journal of Perinatology volume 26, pages 210–214 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction:

Birth of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants outside subspecialty perinatal centers increases risk for death and major morbidities.

Objective:

The purpose of this study is to evaluate barriers to utilizing a regional perinatal center for the birth of VLBW infants to mothers not living in the immediate vicinity of the center.

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of VLBW infants residing in the catchment area of a community level II, Specialty Neonatal Unit (SN) admitted to a Regional Subspecialty Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (RC) between January 1999 and December 31, 2004. Maternal demographics and prenatal care as well as outcomes were compared by place of birth.

Results:

Out of 98 VLBW infants admitted to the RC, 49 (50%) were delivered outside the RC (out-born) and 49 (50%) were born at the RC (in-born). There was no statistical difference in insurance coverage, race, gestational age, severity of illness or maternal demographic factors between out-born and in-born infants. Less than adequate prenatal care rather than distance of maternal residence from the RC was associated with birth outside the RC. Adjusting for prenatal care, distance of residence from the RC increased the risk for delivering outside the center in the subset of mothers insured by Medicaid.

Conclusions:

Mothers of VLBW infants who received less than adequate prenatal care and did not live in the vicinity of a subspecialty center had an increased risk for delivery outside that center compared to those with adequate care. Appropriate place of birth for VLBW infants to low-income mothers may be influenced by the distance of their residence to an RC.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Guidelines for Perinatal Care, 5th edn. American Academy of Pediatrics: Elk Grove Village, IL; American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Washington, DC, 2002.

  2. Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Carpenter JH, Fanaroff AA, Kilpatrick S, LaCorte M et al. Trends in mortality and morbidity for very low birth weight infants, 1991–1999. Pediatrics 2002; 110: 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bode MM, O’Shea TM, Metzguer KR, Stiles AD . Perinatal regionalization and neonatal mortality in North Carolina, 1968–1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 1302–1307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cifuentes J, Bronstein J, Phibbs CS, Phibbs RH, Schmitt SK, Carlo WA . Mortality in low birth weight infants according to level of neonatal care at hospital of birth. Pediatrics 2002; 109: 745–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanderson M, Sappenfield WM, Jespersen KM, Liu Q, Baker SL . Association between level of delivery hospital and neonatal outcomes among South Carolina Medicaid recipients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 1504–1511.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chien LY, Whyte R, Aziz K, Thiessen P, Matthew D, Lee SK . Improved outcome of preterm infants when delivered in tertiary care centers. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 247–252.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Warner B, Musial MJ, Chenier T, Donovan E . The effect of birth hospital type on the outcome of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Menard MK, Liu Q, Holgren EA, Sappenfield WM . Neonatal mortality for very low birth weight deliveries in South Carolina by level of hospital perinatal service. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 374–381.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hogue CJ, Vasquez C . Toward a strategic approach for reducing disparities in infant mortality. Am J Public Health 2002; 92: 552–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Palmer KG, Kronsberg SS, Barton BA, Hobbs CA, Hall RW, Anand KJ . Effect of inborn versus outborn delivery on clinical outcomes in ventilated preterm neonates: secondary results from the NEOPAIN trial. J Perinatol 2005; 25: 270–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Healthy People 2010. US Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, 2000, http://www.healthypeople.gov/document/.

  12. D’Ascoli PT, Alexander GR, Petersen DJ, Kogan MD . Parental factors influencing patterns of prenatal care utilization. J Perinatol 1997; 17: 283–287.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sinkin RA, Fisher SG, Dozier A, Dye TD . Effect of managed care on perinatal transports for the publicly funded in upstate New York. J Perinatol 2005; 25: 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Adams EK, Gavin NI, Benedict MB . Access for pregnant women on Medicaid: variation by race and ethnicity. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2005; 16: 74–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Samuelson JL, Buehler JW, Norris D, Sadek R . Maternal characteristics associated with place of delivery and neonatal mortality rates among very-low-birthweight infants, Georgia. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2002; 16: 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bronstein JM, Capilouto E, Carlo WA, Haywood JL, Goldenberg RL . Access to neonatal intensive care for low-birthweight infants: the role of maternal characteristics. Am J Public Health 1995; 85: 357–361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gould JB, Sarnoff R, Liu H, Bell DR, Chavez G . Very low birth weight births at non-NICU hospitals: the role of sociodemographic, perinatal, and geographic factors. J Perinatol 1999; 19: 197–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carmona R . Access to Quality Health Services. Progress Review. US Department of Health & Human Services, 2002, http://www.healthypeople.gov/data/2010prog/focus01/.

  19. Attar MA, Lang SW, Gates MR, Iatrow AM, Bratton SL . Back transport of neonates: effect on hospital length of stay. J Perinatol 2005; 25: 731–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Richardson DK, Corcoran JD, Escobar GJ, Lee SK . SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II: simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores. J Pediatr 2001; 138: 92–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kessner DM, Kalk CE, Singer J . Assessing health quality — the case for tracers. N Engl J Med 1973; 288: 189–194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S . Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons Inc.: New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Howell EM, Vert P . Neonatal intensive care and birth weight-specific perinatal mortality in Michigan and Lorraine. Pediatrics 1993; 91: 464–469.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dubay L, Joyce T, Kaestner R, Kenney GM . Changes in prenatal care timing and low birth weight by race and socioeconomic status: implications for the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women. Health Serv Res 2001; 36: 373–398.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kogan MD, Martin JA, Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M, Ventura SJ, Frigoletto FD . The changing pattern of prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981–1995, using different prenatal care indices. JAMA 1998; 279: 1623–1628.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Misra DP, Guyer B . Benefits and limitations of prenatal care: from counting visits to measuring content. JAMA 1998; 279: 1661–1662.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. DiGiuseppe DL, Aron DC, Ranbom L, Harper DL, Rosenthal GE . Reliability of birth certificate data: a multi-hospital comparison to medical records information. Matern Child Health J 2002; 6: 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by a grant from Michigan Department of Community Health.

Author information

Author notes

  1. S W Lang

    Present address: Department of Cardiology, Restorative Science & Endodontics, University of Michigan, MI, USA

  2. S L Bratton

    Present address: Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, UT, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    M A Attar, K Hanrahan, S W Lang, M R Gates & S L Bratton

Authors
  1. M A Attar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K Hanrahan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S W Lang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M R Gates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S L Bratton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M A Attar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Attar, M., Hanrahan, K., Lang, S. et al. Pregnant mothers out of the perinatal regionalization's reach. J Perinatol 26, 210–214 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211488

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211488

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links