Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Studying determinants of length of hospital stay

Abstract

Clinicians are accustomed to focusing on individual patients. However, when studying how long their patients stay in the hospital, the focus must widen. Length of stay summarizes the performance of the entire, exceedingly complex, NICU system. Ordinary statistical methods for modeling patient outcomes assume that what happens to one patient is unrelated to what happens to another. However, patients in the same NICU are exposed to similar hospital practices, so patient outcomes may be correlated. Length of stay data must be analyzed by methods that account for possibly correlated outcomes. In addition, to improve patient care and outcomes, predictive models must include determinants clinicians can influence. Such variables describe care process exposures, available beds, demand for beds, and staffing levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Cotten CM, Oh W, McDonald S, Carlo W, Fanaroff AA, Duara S et al. Prolonged hospital stay for extremely premature infants: risk factors, center differemces, and the impact of mortality on selecting a best-performing center. J Perinatol 2005; 25: 650–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Normand S-LT, Glickman ME, Gatsonis CA . Statistical methods for profiling providers of medical care: issues and applications. J Am Statist Assoc 1997; 92: 803–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rothman KJ, Greenland S . Modern Epidemiology. 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schulman J . Managing Your Patients' Data in the Neonatal and Pediatric ICU: an Introduction to Databases and Statistical Analysis. Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Schulman J . Prediction of length of hospital stay in neonatal units for very low birth weight infants (letter). J Perinatol 1999; 19: 613.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hall RW . Queueing Methods For Services and Manufacturing. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reid PP, Compton WD, Grossman JH, Fanjiang G (eds), Committee on Engineering and the Health Care System, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. Building a Better Delivery System: A New Engineering/Health Care Partnership. The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ozcan YA . Quantitative Methods in Health Care Management. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McManus ML, Long MC, Cooper A, Litvak E . Queuing theory accurately models the need for critical care resources. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 1271–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen JM, Six P, Antonioli D, Glemain P, Potel G, Lombrail P et al. A simple method to optimize hospital beds capacity. Int J Med Inform 2005; 74: 39–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schulman J . Evaluating the Processes of Neonatal Intensive Care. BMJ Books: London, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Schulman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schulman, J. Studying determinants of length of hospital stay. J Perinatol 26, 243–245 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211478

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211478

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links