Journal of Perinatology
SEARCH     advanced search my account e-alerts subscribe register
Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Press releases
For authors
For referees
Contact editorial office
About the journal
For librarians
Contact Springer Nature
Customer services
Site features
NPG Subject areas
Access material from all our publications in your subject area:
Biotechnology Biotechnology
Cancer Cancer
Chemistry Chemistry
Dentistry Dentistry
Development Development
Drug Discovery Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology Evolution & Ecology
Genetics Genetics
Immunology Immunology
Materials Materials Science
Medical Research Medical Research
Microbiology Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience Neuroscience
Pharmacology Pharmacology
Physics Physics
Browse all publications

March 2002, Volume 22, Number 2, Pages 165-167

Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Full text  PDF


Effect of Home Monitoring on a High-Risk Population

Gary E Freed DO1, Robert Meny MD2, William Brendle Glomb MD3 and Joseph R Hageman MD4

1Apnea Center and Sleep Laboratory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

2Maryland Sleep Disorders Center, Towson, MD, USA

3Sleep, Pediatric Apnea and Respiratory Control, Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Children's Hospital of Austin, Austin, TX, USA

4Inpatient Pediatrics and Apnea, Evanston Hospital, Northwestern University Medical School, Evanston and Chicago, Il, USA

Correspondence to: Gary R. Freed, DO, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA


A large cohort of infants (8,998) at high risk for sudden and unexpected death was followed with home cardiorespiratory monitoring over a five-year period. These infants included premature infants (23-36 weeks post-conceptual age), SIDS siblings, and infants who experienced an Apparent Life-Threatening Event. The overall SIDS rate in this high-risk population was 0.55/1,000, a rate significantly less than the 0.85 deaths/1,000 reported in the "general population" of Georgia over this same time period. In addition, we report our experience with using home monitors as a diagnostic tool, as well as how monitors can actually be cost-effective.

Editorial opinions, and lay press summaries of the CHIME study (JAMA, May 2, 2001) imply that home cardiorespirtory monitors are of little value. Despite the fact that the study never made this claim, many clinicians are now referring to this study as evidence that home monitoring is ineffective and not needed.

This article disputes those misconceptions about home cardiorespiratory monitors based on our experience with a large high-risk population of infants. Journal of Perinatology (2002) 22, 165-167 DOI: 10.1038/sj/jp/7210662

March 2002, Volume 22, Number 2, Pages 165-167

Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Full text  PDF