Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works NATURE.COM NATURE NEWS NATUREJOBS NATUREEVENTS ABOUT NPG
Help Nature.com site index  
Journal of Perinatology
SEARCH     advanced search my account e-alerts subscribe register
Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
For authors
For referees
Contact editorial office
About the journal
For librarians
Subscribe
Advertising
naturereprints
Contact NPG
Customer services
Site features
NPG Subject areas
Access material from all our publications in your subject area:
Biotechnology Biotechnology
Cancer Cancer
Chemistry Chemistry
Dentistry Dentistry
Development Development
Drug Discovery Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology Evolution & Ecology
Genetics Genetics
Immunology Immunology
Materials Materials Science
Medical Research Medical Research
Microbiology Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience Neuroscience
Pharmacology Pharmacology
Physics Physics
Browse all publications
 

December 2000, Volume 20, Number 8s, Pages S31-S36

Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Article  PDF

Original Article

The Acoustic Environment and Physiological Responses of the Fetus

Robert M Abrams PhD1,2 and Kenneth J Gerhardt PhD1,3

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

2Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

3Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

Correspondence to: Kenneth J. Gerhardt , University of Florida, 338 Dauer Hall, Box 117420, Gainesville, FL 32611.

Abstract

The acoustic environment of the fetus is composed of continuous cardiovascular, respiratory, and intestinal sounds that are punctuated by isolated, shorter bursts during maternal body movements and vocalizations. The distribution of sounds is confined to frequencies below 300 Hz. Additionally, vibrations on the external surface of the maternal abdomen can induce sounds inside the uterus. The half-round sound pressure contours in the abdomen during vibroacoustic stimulation differ from the circular distribution of contours resulting from airborne sound pressure exposure. The static and dynamic forces of the vibrator and the vibrator distance from the target are also factors in sound transmission. Responses to sound are best described in animals and include changes in behavioral state, brain bloodflow, auditory brainstem response, and local cerebral glucose utilization along the central auditory pathway. Journal of Perinatology 2000; 20:S31-S36.

December 2000, Volume 20, Number 8s, Pages S31-S36

Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Article  PDF

Privacy Policy © 2000 Nature Publishing Group