Original Article

Journal of Investigative Dermatology (1983) 81, 409–411; doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12522544

Kathon Biocide: Manifestation of Delayed Contact Dermatitis in Guinea Pigs Is Dependent on the Concentration for Induction and Challenge

Ping Kwong Chan, Robert C Baldwin, Richard D Parsons, Jack N Moss, Robert Stiratelli, Jerry M Smith and A Wallace Hayes

Toxicology Department, Rohm and Haas Company, Spring House, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Received 13 May 1983; Accepted 11 July 1983.

Top

Abstract

The potential of Kathon biocide, an aqueous solution containing, as active ingredients (a.i.), a mixture of 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (14.4% a.i.), to produce delayed contact dermatitis, a sensitization response, was evaluated in outbred Hartley guinea pigs by a modified Buehler's occluded epicutaneous patch technique. The relationship of the response as a function of induction/elicitation concentrations was investigated. Groups of guinea pigs received 9 induction doses of the biocide, 3 times a week, at concentrations ranging from 25–2000 ppm a.i. These guinea pigs were challenged with the biocide at concentrations ranging from 20–2000 ppm a.i., and the application sites were scored for erythema 24 and 48 h after the challenge. The incidence of delayed contact dermatitis in induced guinea pigs was dependent on both the induction and challenge concentrations. The EC50 (concentration at which delayed contact dermatitis was seen in 50% of the population) for induction at a challenge concentration of 2000 ppm a.i., a nonirritating concentration, was estimated to be 88 ppm a.i. with a slope of 3.47 probits/unit log concentration. The EC50 for elicitation at an induction concentration of 1000 ppm a.i. was estimated to be 429 ppm a.i. with a slope of 2.74 probits/unit log concentration. These data demonstrate that for Kathon biocide, there is an induction/elicitation concentration dependency for delayed contact dermatitis response, and there is a "no response concentration" zone where the biocide can be used without concern for clinically significant delayed contact dermatitis. In comparison with a previous study, these data also suggest that the number of induction doses may be an important factor in demonstrating the sensitization potential of a chemical.

Top

References

  1. Fisher, AA: Contact Dermatitis 1973 2d ed. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger,
  2. Andersen, KG, Maibach, HI: Allergic reaction to drugs used topically. Clin Toxicol 1980 16: 415–465,  | PubMed | ChemPort |
  3. Rao, KS, Betso, JE, Olson, KJ: A collection of guinea pig sensitization test results—grouped by chemical class. Drug Chem Toxicol 1981 4: 331–351,  | PubMed | ChemPort |
  4. Rohm and Haas Co. Bulletin: Kathon CG. Cosmetic and Toiletry Preservative 1982
  5. Ritz, HL, Buehler, EV: Planning, conduct, and interpretation of guinea pig sensitization patch test, in Current Concepts in Cutaneous Toxicology 1970 Edited by VA Drill, P Lazar. New York, Academic Press, pp 25–40,
  6. Finney, DJ: Probit Analysis 1971 3d ed. London, Cambridge Univ Press,
  7. Klaassen, CD, Doull, J: Evaluation of safety: toxicologic evaluation, in Casarett and Doull's Toxicology — The Basic Science of Poison 1980 2d ed. Edited by J Doull, CD Klaassen, MO Amdur. New York, Macmillan, p 15,
  8. Marzulli, FN, Maibach, HI: The use of graded concentrations in studying skin sensitizers: experimental contact sensitization in man. Food Cosmet Toxicol 1974 12: 219–227,  | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

Extra navigation

.
ADVERTISEMENT