Commentary

Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2008) 128, 1362–1364. doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5701253

Filaggrin Mutations and Allergic Contact Sensitization

Jon M Hanifin1

1Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Center for Health and Healing, Portland, Oregon, USA

Correspondence: Professor Jon M. Hanifin, Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Center for Health and Healing (CH16D), 3303 SW Bond Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA. E-mail: hanifinj@ohsu.edu

Top

Abstract

In this issue, Novak et al. (2008) provide evidence that filaggrin barrier defects might also predispose to allergic contact dermatitis by allowing greater penetration of chemical haptens. Their report provides a fresh perspective on the issues of contact allergy, nickel sensitization, and stratum corneum defects.

The eczemas comprise a family of inflammatory skin diseases that have as hallmarks itch, epidermal spongiosis, and disruption of the stratum corneum barrier. Atopic dermatitis (AD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) are among the most common and widely studied of the eczemas. In the spring of 2006 a revealing new light focused on AD, firmly associating that disease with ichthyosis vulgaris and loss-of-function mutations in the filaggrin (FLG) gene (Palmer et al., 2006), and subsequent studies have confirmed that finding (Irvine, 2007). This insight gave molecular support to long-standing predictions that AD might be caused by an epidermal barrier defect allowing penetration of irritants, microbes, and protein antigens (Wood et al., 1992).

Those revelations led naturally to the question of whether FLG barrier defects might also predispose to ACD by allowing greater penetration of chemical haptens. In this issue, Novak and collaborators in Germany provide evidence that the answer may be yes (Novak et al., 2008). These investigators looked for two common FLG mutations in a cross-sectional population that had been studied and patch tested with common chemicals in the KORA Allergy Study from 1994 to 1995 (Schäfer et al., 2001). They selected 1,537 subjects equally weighted for the presence of specific IgE and for a history of atopic diseases. Subjects were stratified by age and sex, and the investigators properly distinguished between patch tests showing only contact sensitization and history of actual, relevant allergy with dermatitis caused by nickel or fragrances. Results indicated associations of FLG mutations with nickel sensitization and with reactions to jewelry. Somewhat puzzling was the lack of an association with sensitization to other common haptens. Certainly the frequency of sensitization to preservatives and fragrance chemicals in skin-care products might be expected to be higher in the presence of a diminished barrier. It may be that the sample size in the present study was simply inadequate to provide statistically significant associations with other chemicals. Also, sensitization to such products often occurs through skin areas such as the axilla (e.g., from deodorants) or the face, which can have increased absorption, even with an intact barrier. Oddly, nickel allergy is often associated with skin piercing, which rends even the normal epidermis. Perhaps the simplistic assumption of increased nickel sensitization due to barrier impairment should be questioned and examined further in the future.

It is worth considering that the exclusive FLG association with nickel allergy in this study might reflect mechanisms that are more complex than the simple lack of an adequate physical barrier. Nickel and other metal ions differ from classical haptens in their capacity to activate T cells through a wide range of molecular mechanisms, some of which are dependent on antigen processing and others that are independent (Gamerdinger et al., 2003; Thierse et al., 2005). Nickel may bind to various proteins ranging from serum albumin to enzymes, chaperones, and heat shock proteins (Spiewak et al., 2007). Such complexes not only may ensure transport through epidermal interstices but also may have functional effects on keratinocytes and dendritic cells (Thierse et al., 2005). Protein binding by nickel might be enhanced by a preferential peptide availability caused by FLG mutations. Interestingly, nickel can also bind and activate calcineurin to upregulate nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) in keratinocytes (Al-Daraji et al., 2002), possibly initiating inflammation that enhances allergic sensitization. For many years we have followed the well-defined concept that antigenic messages are transmitted by Langerhans cells, but we have tended to ignore possible contributions from other epidermal cells to contact sensitization until relatively recently. Studies have increasingly focused on the role of the keratinocytes in priming for eczematous inflammation (Li et al., 2006).

Top

FLG mutations are associated with higher frequencies of sensitization to nickel but not to other haptens.

Nickel may have unique antigenic properties through differing associations with a variety of cells during induction of sensitization. Nickel ions, too small for antigenic recognition, are highly reactive in combining with extracellular proteins and altering spatial conformation to become allergenic. The nickel-induced changes in tertiary structure allow for dendritic cell (DC) presentation of haptenic complexes in the context of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules to T-cell receptors (TCRs) on CD4+ lymphocytes (Spiewak et al., 2007). Alternatively, nickel's reactivity with intracellular proteins can provide for processing and presentation, in association with MHC class I molecules, to CD8+ T lymphocytes. A third, metabolism-independent pathway allows direct linkage of nickel to dendritic cell MHC and to TCRs, analogous to superantigen T-cell activation (Gamerdinger et al., 2003). Nickel may also have direct effects on DCs to enhance maturation, trigger signaling pathways, and increase expression of chemokines and costimulatory molecules (Aiba et al., 2003). Hypersensitivity reactions to nickel have been reported to be represented by both T-helper 1 (Th1) and Th2 cells, although results have varied, and this dual profile has been reported for reactions to other antigens as well (Spiewak et al., 2007; Ohmen et al., 1995). Overall, nickel has unique features as a contact allergen, and these may lead to a better understanding of the association with FLG mutations.

Another aspect relates to the complex interaction spectrum of atopy, AD, nickel sensitivity, and allergic contact reactivity. Novak et al. (2008) confirmed previous reports demonstrating associations between FLG mutations and AD and respiratory allergy (Irvine, 2007). Past studies of contact sensitivity have struggled with the paradoxical situation of impaired experimental sensitization in AD, the frequently noted association with nickel allergy (Rajka, 1989), and the higher frequency of positive patch tests in atopy and AD (Klas et al., 1996). Contradictory conclusions are often noted (Spiewak, 2005), and many studies have been compromised by inconsistent definitions of atopy and AD and by concerns about irritant reactions mistaken for contact allergy (Heine et al., 2004). Patients with respiratory allergies or AD have lower thresholds for irritants, possibly reflecting both barrier impairment and greater inflammatory reactivity (Nassif et al., 1994). Novak and colleagues do not present data for nickel allergy in their atopic vs. nonatopic subjects but note that the association of FLG mutations with nickel was not related to greater sensitization in atopic individuals, referencing recent European studies (Spiewak, 2005; Heine et al., 2004). The initial report of contact allergy data in this subject population showed a nonsignificant tendency toward a higher frequency of sensitization in the small subpopulation with AD (Schäfer et al., 2001). It is possible that an increased risk of sensitization occurs only in AD individuals with FLG mutations or coexisting ichthyosis.

The report by Novak et al. provides a fresh perspective on the issues of contact allergy, nickel sensitization, and stratum corneum defects. Individuals with FLG mutations appear to have an increased risk of nickel sensitization. The questions of nickel sensitivity in atopics probably cannot be clarified definitively without large prospective studies of well-characterized subjects with AD, with and without ichthyosis. Most likely, similar associations will eventually be seen for some other contact allergens. Other metal sensitivities will be an interesting area to examine. The clinical implications for ichthyosis and other barrier defects will also warrant our attention as this story unfolds.

Top

Conflict of Interest

The author states no conflict of interest.

Top

References

  1. Aiba S, Manome H, Nakagawa S, Mollah ZU, Mizuashi M, Ohtani T et al. (2003) p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinases play distinct roles in the activation of dendritic cells by two representative haptens, NiCl2 and 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene. J Invest Dermatol 120:390–399 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  2. Al-Daraji WI, Grant KR, Ryan K, Saxton A, Reynolds NJ (2002) Localization of calcineurin/NFAT in human skin and psoriasis and inhibition of calcineurin/NFAT activation in human keratinocytes by cyclosporine A. J Invest Dermatol 118:779–788 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  3. Gamerdinger K, Moulon C, Karp DR, Van Bergen J, Koning F, Wild D et al. (2003) A new type of metal recognition by human T cells: contact residues for peptide-independent bridging of T cell receptor and major histocompatibility complex by nickel. J Exp Med 197:1345–1353 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  4. Heine G, Schnuch A, Uter W, Worm M (2004) Frequency of contact allergy in German children and adolescents patch tested between 1995 and 2002: results from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology and the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Contact Dermatitis 51:111–117 | Article | PubMed |
  5. Irvine AD (2007) Fleshing out filaggrin phenotypes. J Invest Dermatol 127:504–507 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  6. Klas PA, Corey G, Storrs FJ, Chan SC, Hanifin JM (1996) Allergic and irritant patch test reactions and atopic disease. Contact Dermatitis 34:121–124 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  7. Li M, Hener P, Zhang Z, Kato S, Metzger D, Chambon P (2006) Topical vitamin D3 and low-calcemic analogs induce thymic stromal lymphopoietin in mouse keratinocytes and trigger an atopic dermatitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:11736–11741 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  8. Nassif A, Chan SC, Storrs FJ, Hanifin JM (1994) Abnormal skin irritancy in atopic dermatitis and in atopy without dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 130:1402–1407 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  9. Novak N, Baurecht H, Schäfer T, Rodriguez E, Wagenpfeil S, Klopp N et al. (2008) Loss-of-function mutations in the filaggrin gene and allergic contact sensitization to nickel. J Invest Dermatol 128:1430–1435
  10. Ohmen JD, Hanifin JM, Nickoloff BJ, Rea TH, Wyzykowski R, Kim J et al. (1995) Overexpression of IL-10 in atopic dermatitis: contrasting cytokine patterns with delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. J Immunol 154:1956–1963 | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  11. Palmer CN, Irvine AD, Terron-Kwiatkowski A, Zhao Y, Liao H, Lee SP et al. (2006) Common loss-of-function variants of the epidermal barrier protein filaggrin are a major predisposing factor for atopic dermatitis. Nat Genet 38:441–446 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  12. Rajka G (1989) Essential Aspects of Atopic Dermatitis. Springer: Berlin, Germany p 123
  13. Schäfer T, Böhler E, Ruhdorfer S, Weigl L, Wessner D, Filipiak B et al. (2001) Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults. Allergy 56:1192–1196 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  14. Spiewak R (2005) Atopy and contact hypersensitivity: a reassessment of the relationship using objective measures. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 95:61–65 | PubMed |
  15. Spiewak R, Pietowska J, Curzytek K (2007) Nickel: a unique allergen—from molecular structure to European legislation. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 3:851–859 | Article | ChemPort |
  16. Thierse H-J, Gamerdinger K, Junkes C, Guerreiro N, Weltzien HU (2005) T cell receptor (TCR) interaction with haptens: metal ions as non-classical haptens. Toxicology 209:101–107 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  17. Wood LC, Jackson SM, Elias PM, Grunfeld C, Feingold KR (1992) Cutaneous barrier perturbation stimulates cytokine production in the epidermis of mice. J Clin Invest 90:484–487 | Article |

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

Skin barrier function and allergic risk

Nature Genetics News and Views (01 Apr 2006)

Extra navigation

.
ADVERTISEMENT