Original Article

Journal of Human Hypertension (2004) 18, 397–402. doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.1001709 Published online 8 April 2004

Association of left bundle branch block with left ventricular structure and function in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study

This study was supported by Grant COZ 368 from Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA, USA. Drs. Devereux and Dahlöf receive occasional honoraria from Merck.

Z B Li1, K Wachtell2, P M Okin1, E Gerdts3, J E Liu1, M S Nieminen4, S Jern5, B Dahlöf5 and R B Devereux1

  1. 1Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
  2. 2Department of Medicine, Glostrup University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark
  3. 3Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
  4. 4Department of Cardiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  5. 5Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden

Correspondence: Dr RB Devereux, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Division of Cardiology, Box 222, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA. E-mail: rbdevere@med.cornell.edu

Top

Abstract

Electrocardiographic (ECG) left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), but its relation to left ventricular (LV) geometry and function in hypertensive patients with ECG LVH is unknown. Echocardiograms were performed in 933 patients (548 women, mean age 66plusminus7 years) with essential hypertension and LVH by baseline ECG in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study. LBBB, defined by Minnesota code 7.1, was present in 47 patients and absent in 886 patients. Patients with and without LBBB were similar in age, gender, body mass index, blood pressure, prevalence of diabetes, and history of myocardial infarction. Despite similarly elevated mean LV mass (126plusminus25 vs 124plusminus26 g/m2) and relative wall thickness (0.41plusminus0.07 vs 0.41plusminus0.07, P=NS), patients with LBBB had lower LV fractional shortening (30plusminus6 vs 34plusminus6%), ejection fraction (56plusminus10 vs 61plusminus8%), midwall shortening (14plusminus2 vs 16plusminus2%), stress-corrected midwall shortening (90plusminus13 vs 97plusminus13%) (all P<0.001), and lower LV stroke index (38plusminus7 vs 42plusminus9 ml/m2) (P<0.05). Patients with LBBB also had reduced LV inferior wall and lower mitral E/A ratio (0.75plusminus0.18 vs 0.87plusminus0.38) (all P<0.05). The above univariate results were confirmed by multivariate analyses adjusted for gender, age, blood pressures, height, weight, body mass index, heart rate, and LV mass index. Among hypertensive patients at high risk because of ECG LVH, the presence of LBBB identifies individuals with worse global and regional LV systolic function and impaired LV relaxation without more severe LVH by echocardiography.

Keywords:

echocardiography, electrocardiogram, hypertrophy, left bundle branch block, left ventricle

Extra navigation

.
ADVERTISEMENT