Original Article

Journal of Human Hypertension (2004) 18, 193–200. doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.1001649

Office blood pressure underestimates ambulatory blood pressure in peripheral arterial disease in comparison to healthy controls

P Svensson1, U de Faire1,2, U Niklasson3 and J Östergren4

  1. 1Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Hospital, Sweden
  2. 2Division of Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  3. 3Department of Clinical Physiology, Karolinska Hospital, Sweden
  4. 4Department of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska Hospital, Sweden

Correspondence: Dr P Svensson, Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, S-171 76, Sweden. E-mail: per.svensson@ks.se

Received 29 April 2003; Revised 14 July 2003; Accepted 24 August 2003.

Top

Abstract

Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) constitute a subgroup of high-risk hypertensives, but controlled studies on 24-h blood pressure (BP) and diurnal variation of BP are lacking. This study was performed in order to test the hypothesis that office BP (OBP) may underestimate 24-h BP in PAD patients in comparison to a matched control group. In all, 98 male patients (mean age 68 years) with a history of intermittent claudication and an ankle/brachial index less than 0.9, and 94 controls matched for age but without PAD or ischaemic heart disease performed 24-h recordings of ambulatory BP. A total of 59 patients had a history of hypertension and 69 were on treatment with BP-lowering drugs as compared to 17 and 23 of the control subjects, respectively. Office as well as 24-h systolic BP (SBP) were higher in patients as compared to controls (151plusminus22 vs 140plusminus20 mmHg, P<0.001 and 142plusminus14 vs 133plusminus15 mmHg, P<0.001, respectively), but did not differ with regard to diastolic BP. In an analysis of covariance with the continuous factors age, office SBP and the categorical factor antihypertensive treatment, 24-h SBP was higher in PAD patients compared to controls (P<0.05). The difference between office and night SBP was lower in PAD patients with antihypertensive treatment compared to controls (P=0.01). In conclusion, Male patients with PAD had higher systolic but not diastolic BP than age-matched control subjects. In PAD patients, 24-h SBP was higher than expected from OBP compared to controls. Night SBP was higher only in patients with antihypertensive treatment. In PAD patients, especially when on antihypertensive treatment, the severity of hypertension may be underestimated when based on OBP only.

Keywords:

peripheral vascular disease, blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory, blood pressure determination, circadian rhythm, antihypertensive therapy

Extra navigation

.
ADVERTISEMENT