Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works NATURE.COM NATURE NEWS NATUREJOBS NATUREEVENTS ABOUT NPG
Help Nature.com site index  
Journal of Human Hypertension
SEARCH     advanced search my account e-alerts subscribe register
Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
For authors
For referees
Contact editorial office
About the journal
For librarians
Subscribe
Advertising
naturereprints
Contact NPG
Customer services
Site features
NPG Subject areas
Access material from all our publications in your subject area:
Biotechnology Biotechnology
Cancer Cancer
Chemistry Chemistry
Dentistry Dentistry
Development Development
Drug Discovery Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology Evolution & Ecology
Genetics Genetics
Immunology Immunology
Materials Materials Science
Medical Research Medical Research
Microbiology Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience Neuroscience
Pharmacology Pharmacology
Physics Physics
Browse all publications
 
November 2002, Volume 16, Number 11, Pages 795-803
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Full text  PDF
Original Article
The safety of valsartan: results of a postmarketing surveillance study on 12 881 patients in England
P N Biswas1, L V Wilton1 and S W Shakir1,2

1Drug Safety Research Unit, Bursledon Hall, Southampton SO31 1AA, UK

2London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Correspondence to: Dr PN Biswas, Drug Safety Research Unit, Bursledon Hall, Blundell Lane, Southampton S031 1AA, UK. E-mail: pipasha.biswas@dsru.org

Abstract

Valsartan is a second class of angiotensin II receptor antagonist, indicated for the treatment of hypertension. The objective of the study was to monitor the safety of valsartan using the technique of prescription event monitoring (PEM), in patients who were prescribed this drug by general practitioners (GPs) in England. PEM is a noninterventional observation cohort technique. Exposure data were obtained from dispensed prescriptions issued between December 1996 and November 1998. Outcome data were obtained by sending questionnaires to prescribing GPs. The cohort comprised 12 881 patients. Events most frequently reported as suspected adverse drug reactions were malaise/lassitude (37; 0.3% of total cohort), dizziness (19; 0.1%), and unspecified side effects (57; 0.4%). Events with the highest incidence density (ID1 per 1000 patient-months of treatment) in the first month of treatment were malaise/lassitude (15.6), dizziness (11.8), and headache/migraine (10.9). Most frequent reasons for stopping valsartan were not effective (847; 6.6% of total cohort), malaise/lassitude (265; 21%), and dizziness (146; 1.1%). No unexpected serious adverse events were identified. Other events assessed as possibly related to valsartan use were impotence (37), dizziness (19), cough (9), facial oedema (5), hyperkalaemia (3), and angioneurotic oedema (1). There were four reports of exposure during pregnancy and 203 deaths (1.5%) in this cohort. In conclusion, this study monitored the safety profile of valsartan in a large cohort of patients in general practice in England. No untoward features other than dizziness were identified that were not mentioned in the prescribing guidance.

Journal of Human Hypertension (2002) 16, 795-803. doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.1001490

Keywords

valsartan; prescription event monitoring; safety; adverse drug reactions

Received 29 May 2002; accepted 6 September 2002
November 2002, Volume 16, Number 11, Pages 795-803
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Full text  PDF
Privacy Policy © 2002 Nature Publishing Group