Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works NATURE.COM NATURE NEWS NATUREJOBS NATUREEVENTS ABOUT NPG
Help Nature.com site index  
Journal of Human Hypertension
SEARCH     advanced search my account e-alerts subscribe register
Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
For authors
For referees
Contact editorial office
About the journal
For librarians
Subscribe
Advertising
naturereprints
Contact NPG
Customer services
Site features
NPG Subject areas
Access material from all our publications in your subject area:
Biotechnology Biotechnology
Cancer Cancer
Chemistry Chemistry
Dentistry Dentistry
Development Development
Drug Discovery Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology Evolution & Ecology
Genetics Genetics
Immunology Immunology
Materials Materials Science
Medical Research Medical Research
Microbiology Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience Neuroscience
Pharmacology Pharmacology
Physics Physics
Browse all publications
 
April 1999, Volume 13, Number 4, Pages 275-281
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Article  PDF
Original article
Dose-response efficacy of valsartan, a new angiotensin II receptor blocker
J L Pool1,a, R Glazer2, Y-T Chiang2 and M Gatlin2

1Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

2Cardiovascular Clinical Development, Novartis, East Hanover, NJ, USA

aCorrespondence: Dr James Pool, Methodist Hospital Research, 6535 Fannin Mail Station, F-504 Room 531, Houston, TX 77030, USA

Abstract

Objective: To study the efficacy and tolerability of a range of valsartan doses in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.Design: 122 adult out-patients were randomised in equal numbers to receive valsartan 10 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, 160 mg or placebo once daily (OD) for 4 weeks in this multicentre, double-blind, fixed-dose, parallel trial. Patients were assessed at 0, 2 and 4 weeks.Main outcome measures: The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in trough mean supine diastolic blood pressure (MSuDBP). Other variables included change from baseline in trough mean supine systolic blood pressure (MSuSBP), responder rates and trough/peak ratio.Results: All treatments significantly reduced MSuDBP and MSuSBP at 4-week end-point compared to baseline (P < 0.001). the magnitude of blood pressure lowering was greater with increasing doses of valsartan (least square mean change from baseline for placebo, valsartan 10 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, 160 mg respectively: msudbp -4.4 mm hg, -4.9 mm hg, -6.5 mm hg, -8.2 mm hg, -9.1 mm hg; msusbp -1.3 mm hg, -3.6 mm hg, -7.0 mm hg, -11.1 mm hg, -11.9 mm hg). a fitted quadratic curve, to predict relationship between dose and change from baseline in trough msudbp, indicated a positive dose response. responder rates were 16%, 24%, 33%, 46%, 54% for placebo, valsartan 10 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, 160 mg respectively, which also indicated a positive dose response in the dose range of 10 mg to 160 mg. greater than 50% of the antihypertensive effect measured at peak persisted at trough for each of the four active treatment groups, confirming efficacy over a 24-h period. no dose-related adverse experiences were observed, with overall incidence (regardless of relationship to trial medication) of 44% with placebo and 44%, 36%, 22%, 21% for valsartan 10 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, 160 mg respectively. the most common adverse experience reported was headache which occurred most frequently with placebo (12%). no trial drug-related cough was observed. treatment with valsartan did not produce clinically significant orthostatic changes in diastolic or systolic blood pressure. one case of symptomatic orthostatic hypotension was observed on placebo.Conclusions: The results of this trial show valsartan to effectively lower blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, and demonstrate that the reduction in blood pressure increases with increasing dose levels.

Keywords

valsartan; angiotensin II receptor antagonist; hypertension

Received 5 August 1998; revised 25 November 1998; accepted 25 November 1998
April 1999, Volume 13, Number 4, Pages 275-281
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Article  PDF
Privacy Policy © 1999 Nature Publishing Group