Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works NATURE.COM NATURE NEWS NATUREJOBS NATUREEVENTS ABOUT NPG
Help Nature.com site index  
Journal of Human Hypertension
SEARCH     advanced search my account e-alerts subscribe register
Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
For authors
For referees
Contact editorial office
About the journal
For librarians
Subscribe
Advertising
naturereprints
Contact NPG
Customer services
Site features
NPG Subject areas
Access material from all our publications in your subject area:
Biotechnology Biotechnology
Cancer Cancer
Chemistry Chemistry
Dentistry Dentistry
Development Development
Drug Discovery Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology Evolution & Ecology
Genetics Genetics
Immunology Immunology
Materials Materials Science
Medical Research Medical Research
Microbiology Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience Neuroscience
Pharmacology Pharmacology
Physics Physics
Browse all publications
 
October 1999, Volume 13, Number 10, Pages 657-664
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Article  PDF
Original article
ABPM comparison of the antihypertensive profiles of the selective angiotensin II receptor antagonists telmisartan and losartan in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension
J M Mallion1, J P Siche1 and Y Lacourcière2 the Telmisartan Blood Pressure Monitoring Group

1A Michallon Hospital, Grenoble, France

2Hypertension Research Unit, Centre Hospitalier Université Laval, Quebec, Canada

Correspondence to: Professor Jean-Michel Mallion, A.Michallon Hospital, 38043 Grenoble, France

Abstract

The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability profiles of the selective AT1 receptor antagonists telmisartan and losartan were compared with placebo in a 6-week, multinational, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study of 223 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, defined as clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95 and 114 mm Hg, clinic systolic blood pressure (SBP) 140 and 200 mm Hg, and 24-h ambulatory DBP 85 mm Hg. After a 4-week single-blind placebo run-in, eligible patients were randomised to receive telmisartan 40 mg, telmisartan 80 mg, losartan 50 mg, or placebo. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) after 6 weeks of double-blind therapy showed that all active treatments produced significant (P < 0.01) reductions from baseline in 24-h mean sbp and dbp compared with placebo. during the 18-to-24 h period after dosing, the reductions in sbp/dbp with telmisartan 40 mg (10.7/6.8 mm hg) and 80 mg (12.2/7.1 mm hg) were each significantly (P <0.05) greater than those observed for losartan 50 mg (6.0/3.7 mm hg), and losartan was no better than placebo. also for the 24-h mean blood pressure, telmisartan 40 mg and 80 mg were significantly (P< 0.05) better than losartan 50 mg. compared with losartan, telmisartan 80 mg produced significantly (P < 0.05) greater reductions in both sbp and dbp during all monitored periods of the 24-h period, while telmisartan 40 mg produced significantly greater reductions in sbp and dbp in the night-time period (10.01 pm to 5.59 am) (P < 0.05) and in dbp in the morning period (6.00 am to 11.59 am) (P < 0.05). all treatments were comparably well tolerated. telmisartan 40 mg and 80 mg once daily were effective and well tolerated in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension, producing sustained 24-h blood pressure control which compared favourably with losartan.

Keywords

telmisartan; losartan; efficacy; ABPM

Received 13 April 1999; revised 2 July 1999; accepted 20 July 1999
October 1999, Volume 13, Number 10, Pages 657-664
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Article  PDF
Privacy Policy © 1999 Nature Publishing Group