Article
Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology advance online publication 28 October 2009; doi: 10.1038/jes.2009.53
Occupational exposure to benzene at the ExxonMobil Refinery in Baytown, TX (1978–2006)
Shannon H Gaffneya, Julie M Pankob, Ken M Uniceb, Amanda M Burnsb, Marisa L Kreiderb, Richard H Gelattc, Lindsay E Booherd and Dennis J Paustenbacha
- aChemRisk, LLC, 25 Jessie Street, Suite 1800, San Francisco, California, USA
- bChemRisk, LLC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- cExxonMobil Biological Sciences, Annandale, New Jersey, USA
- dExxonMobil Production Company, Houston, Texas, USA
Correspondence: Dr. Shannon H. Gaffney, ChemRisk, LLC, 25 Jessie Street, Suite 1800, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA. Tel.: 415-896-2400. Fax: 415-896-2444. E-mail: sgaffney@chemrisk.com
Received 18 June 2009; Accepted 31 August 2009; Published online 28 October 2009.
Abstract
Although occupational benzene exposure of refinery workers has been studied for decades, no extensive analysis of historical industrial hygiene data has been performed focusing on airborne concentrations at specific refineries and tasks. This study characterizes benzene exposures at the ExxonMobil Baytown, TX, refinery from 1978 to 2006 to understand the variability in workers' exposures over time and during different job tasks. Exposures were grouped by operational status, job title, and tasks. More than 9000 industrial hygiene air samples were evaluated; approximately 4000 non-task (>3 h) and 1000 task-related (<3 h) personal samples were considered. Each sample was assigned to one of 27 job titles, 29 work areas, and 16 task bins (when applicable). Process technicians were sampled most frequently, resulting in the following mean benzene concentrations by area: hydrofiner (n=245, mean=1.3 p.p.m.), oil movements (n=286, mean=0.23 p.p.m.), reformer (n=575, mean=0.10 p.p.m.), tank farm (n=9, mean=0.65 p.p.m.), waste treatment (n=446, mean=0.13 p.p.m.), and other areas (n=460, mean=0.062 p.p.m.). The most frequently sampled task was sample collection (n=218, mean=0.40 p.p.m.). Job title and area did not significantly impact task-related exposures. Airborne concentrations were significantly lower after 1990 than before 1990. Results of this task-focused study may be useful when analyzing benzene exposures at other refineries.
Keywords:
benzene, refineries, exposure assessment, industrial hygiene
