Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Validation of continuous particle monitors for personal, indoor, and outdoor exposures

Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology volume 21, pages 49–64 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Continuous monitors can be used to supplement traditional filter-based methods of determining personal exposure to air pollutants. They have the advantages of being able to identify nearby sources and detect temporal changes on a time scale of a few minutes. The Windsor Ontario Exposure Assessment Study (WOEAS) adopted an approach of using multiple continuous monitors to measure indoor, outdoor (near-residential) and personal exposures to PM2.5, ultrafine particles and black carbon. About 48 adults and households were sampled for five consecutive 24-h periods in summer and winter 2005, and another 48 asthmatic children for five consecutive 24-h periods in summer and winter 2006. This article addresses the laboratory and field validation of these continuous monitors. A companion article (Wheeler et al., 2010) provides similar analyses for the 24-h integrated methods, as well as providing an overview of the objectives and study design. The four continuous monitors were the DustTrak (Model 8520, TSI, St. Paul, MN, USA) and personal DataRAM (pDR) (ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for PM2.5; the P-Trak (Model 8525, TSI) for ultrafine particles; and the Aethalometer (AE-42, Magee Scientific, Berkeley, CA, USA) for black carbon (BC). All monitors were tested in multiple co-location studies involving as many as 16 monitors of a given type to determine their limits of detection as well as bias and precision. The effect of concentration and electronic drift on bias and precision were determined from both the collocated studies and the full field study. The effect of rapid changes in environmental conditions on switching an instrument from indoor to outdoor sampling was also studied. The use of multiple instruments for outdoor sampling was valuable in identifying occasional poor performance by one instrument and in better determining local contributions to the spatial variation of particulate pollution. Both the DustTrak and pDR were shown to be in reasonable agreement (R2 of 90 and 70%, respectively) with the gravimetric PM2.5 method. Both instruments had limits of detection of about 5 μg/m3. The DustTrak and pDR had multiplicative biases of about 2.5 and 1.6, respectively, compared with the gravimetric samplers. However, their average bias-corrected precisions were <10%, indicating that a proper correction for bias would bring them into very good agreement with standard methods. Although no standard methods exist to establish the bias of the Aethalometer and P-Trak, the precision was within 20% for the Aethalometer and within 10% for the P-Trak. These findings suggest that all four instruments can supply useful information in environmental studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen R., Larson T., Sheppard L., Wallace L., and Liu L.-J. Use of real-time light scattering data to estimate the contribution of infiltrated and indoor-generated particles to indoor air. Environ Sci Tech 2003: 37: 3484–3492.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allen R., Larson T., Sheppard L., Wallace L., and Liu L-J Estimated hourly personal exposures to ambient and non-ambient particulate matter among sensitive populations in Seattle, Washington. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2004: 54: 1197–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen R., Wallace L.A., Larson T., Sheppard L., and Liu L.-J. Evaluation of the recursive model approach for estimating particulate matter infiltration efficiencies using continuous light scattering data. J Exposure Sci Environ Epidem 2007: 17: 468–477.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arnott W.P., Hamasha K., Moosmuller H., Sheridan P.J., and Ogren J.A. Towards aerosol light-absorption measurements with a 7-wavelength Aethalometer: evaluation with a photoacoustic instrument 3-wavelength nephelometer. AerSciTechnol 2005: 39: 17–29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers G.P. Comment on regression analysis of air quality data. Atmos Environ 2001: 35: 2423–2425.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bräuner E.V., Forchhammer L., Møller P., Barregard L., Gunnarsen L., and Afshari A., et al. Indoor particles affect vascular function in the aged: an air filtration-based intervention study. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2007b: 177: 419–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bräuner E.V., Forchhammer L., Møller P., Simonsen J., Glasius M., and Wåhlin P., et al. Exposure to ultrafine particles from ambient air oxidative stress-induced DNA damage. Environ Health Perspect 2007a: 115: 1177–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti B., Fine P.M., Delfino R., and Sioutas C. Performance evaluation of the active-flow personal DataRAM PM2.5 mass monitor (Thermo Anderson pDR-1200) designed for continuous personal exposure measurements. Atmospheric Environ 2004: 38: 3329–3340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan C.-C., Chuang K.-J., Shiao G.-M., and Lin L.-Y. Personal exposure to submicrometer articles and heart rate variability in human subjects. Environ Health Perspectives 2004: 112: 1063–1067.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang L-T., Suh H.H., Wolfson J.M., Misra K., Allen G.A., Catalano P.J., and Koutrakis P Laboratory and field evaluation of measurement methods for one-hour exposures to O3, PM2.5, and CO. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2001: 51: 1414–1422.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chow J.C., Watson J.G., Doraiswamy P., Chen L.-W.A., Sodeman D.A., and Lowenthal DH, et al. Aerosol light absorption, black carbon and elemental carbon at the Fresno Supersite, California. Atmos Res 2009: 93: 874–887.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dales R., Wheeler A.J., Mahmud M., Frescura A.-M., and Liu L. The influence of neighborhood roadways on respiratory symptoms among elementary schoolchildren. J Occup Environ Med 2009: 51: 654–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demokritou P., Kavouras I., Ferguson S., and Koutrakis P. Development and laboratory performance evaluation of a multipollutant sampler for simultaneous measurements for particulate and gaseous pollutants. Aerosol Sci Technol 2001: 35: 741–752.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Draper N.R., and Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis, (2nd edn.) Wiley, New York, NY, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebelt S.E., Coull B.A., Ruiz P.A., Koutrakis P., and Suh H.H. The influences of ambient particle composition and size on particle infiltration in Los Angeles, CA, residences. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2006: 56: 186–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC. Demonstration of equivalence of ambient air monitoring methods, 2005: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pdf/equivalence_report2.pdf Accessed 9/12/09.

  • Fischer S.L., and Koshland CP Field performance of a nephelometer in rural kitchens: effects of high humidity excursions and correlations to gravimetric analyses. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007: 17: 141–150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • HEI. Diesel Emissions and Lung Cancer: Epidemiology and Quantitative Risk Assessment. Health Effects Institute, Boston, MA, 1999.

  • Howard-Reed C., Rea A.W., Zufall M.J., Burke J.M., Williams R.W., and Suggs J/C, et al. Use of a continuous nephelometer to measure personal exposure to particles during the US Environmental Protection Agency Baltimore and Fresno panel studies. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2000: 50: 1125–1132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isobe T., Feigelson E.D., Akritas M.G., and Babu G.J. Linear regression in astronomy. I. Astrophys J 1990: 364: 104–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez J., Claiborn C., Larson T., Gould T., Kirchstetter T.W., and Gundel L. Loading effect correction for real-time Aethalometer measurements of fresh diesel soot. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2007: 57: 868–873.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchstetter T.W., and Novakov T. Controlled generation of black carbon particles from a diffusion flame and applications in evaluating black carbon measurement methods. Atmos Environ 2007: 41: 1874–1888.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krewski D., Jerrett M., Burnett RT., Ma R., Hughes E., and Shi Y, et al. Extended Analysis of the American Cancer Society Study of Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality. Health Effects Institute Boston, MA, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaRosa L.E., Buckley T.J., and Wallace L.A. Real-Time indoor and outdoor measurements of black carbon in an occupied house: an examination of sources. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2002: 52: 174–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavanchy V.M.H., Gaggeler H.W., Nyeki S., and Baltensperger U Elemental carbon (EC) and black carbon (BC) measurements with a thermal method and an Aethalometer at the high-alpine research station Jungfraujoch. Atmos Environ 1999: 33: 2759–2769.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L.J., Box M., Kalman D., Kaufman J., Koenig J., and Larson T, et al. Exposure assessment of particulate matter for susceptible populations in Seattle. Environ Health Perspect 2003: 111: 909–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu LJ., Slaughter JC., and Larson T.V. Comparison of light scattering devices and impactors for particulate measurements in indoor, outdoor, and personal environments. Environ Sci Technol 2002: 36: 2977–2986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L., Poon R., Chen L., Frescura A.-M., Montuschi P., and Ciabattoni G., et al. Acute effects of air pollution on pulmonary function, airway inflammation, and oxidative stress in asthmatic children. Environ Health Perspect 2009: 117: 668–674.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marsik T., and Johnson R. HVAC air-quality model and its use to test a PM2.5 control strategy. Building Environ 2008: 43: 1850–1857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matson U., Ekberg L.E., and Afshari A. Measurement of ultrafine particles: a comparison of two handheld condensation particle counters. Aerosol Sci Technol 2004: 38: 487–495.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McMurry P.H., and Stolzenburg M.R. On the sensitivity of particle size to relative humidity for Los Angeles aerosols. Atmos Environ 1989: 23: 497–507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morawska L., He C., Hitchins J., Mengersen K., and Gilbert D. Characteristics of particle number and mass concentrations in residential houses in Brisbane, Australia. Atmos Environ 2003: 37: 4195–4203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council-National Academy of Science. Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter I: Immediate Priorities and a Long-Range Research Portfolio. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1998.

  • Niu J., Rasmussen P.E., Wheeler A., Williams R., and Chenier M Evaluation of airborne particulate matter and metals data in personal, indoor and outdoor environments using ED-XRF and ICP-MS and co-located duplicate samples. Atmos Environ 2010: 44: 235–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osman L.M., Douglas J.G., Garden C., Reglitz K., Lyon J., Gordon S., and Ayres JG Indoor air quality in homes of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007: 176: 465–472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park K., Chow J.C., Watson J.G., Trimble D.L., Doraiswamy P., and Arnott WP, et al. Comparison of continuous and filter-based carbon measurements at the Fresno Supersite. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2006: 56: 474–491.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quintana P.J.E., Samimi B.S., Kleinman M.T., Liu L.-J., Soto K., and Bufalino C., et al. Evaluation of a real-time passive personal particle monitor in fixed site residential indoor and ambient measurements. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2000: 10: 437–445.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen P.E., MacIntyre D.J., and Guenette J. Buoyancy-Corrected Gravimetric Analysis System. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Number 7357045 2008: http://patft.uspto.gov/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen P.E., Wheeler A., Hassan N., Filiatreault A., and Lanouette M. Monitoring personal, indoor, and outdoor exposures to metals in airborne particulate matter: risk of contamination during sampling, handling and analysis. Atmos Environ 2007: 41: 5897–5907.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz J. Air pollution and daily mortality: a review and meta analysis. Environ Res 1994: 64: 36–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon P.A., Hopke P.K., Froines J., and Scheffe R. Key scientific findings and policy and health-relevant insights from the US Environmental Protection Agency's Particulate Matter Supersites Program and related studies: an integration and synthesis of results. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2008: 58 (13 Suppl): S–3–S-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuch T., Mirme A., Tamm E., Heinrich J., Heyder J., and Brand P., et al. Comparison of two particle-size spectrometers for ambient aerosol measurements. Atmos Environ 1999: 34: 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virkkula A., Mäkelä T., and Hillamo R. A simple procedure for correcting loading effects of Aethalometer data. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2007: 57: 1214–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace L.A., Mitchell H., O’Connor G.T., Liu L.-J., Neas L., and Lippmann M., et al. Particle concentrations in inner-city homes of children with asthma: the effect of smoking, cooking, and outdoor pollution. Environ Health Perspect 2003: 111: 1265–1272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace L.A. Real-time measurements of black carbon indoors and outdoors: a comparison of the photoelectric aerosol sensor and the Aethalometer. Aerosol Sci Technol 2005: 39: 1015–1025.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace L.A., Williams R., Rea A., and Croghan C. Continuous weeklong measurements of personal exposures and indoor concentrations of fine particles for 37 health-impaired North Carolina residents for up to four seasons. Atmos Environ 2006a: 40: 399–414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace L., Williams R., Suggs J., and Jones P. Estimating Contributions of Outdoor Fine Particles to Indoor Concentrations and Personal Exposures: Effects of Household and Personal Activities. US EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA/600/R-06/023. 2006b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingartner E., Saathoff H., Schnaiter M., Streit N., Bitnar B., and Baltensperger U. Absorption of light by soot particles: determination of the absorption coefficient by means of Aethalometers. J Aerosol Sci 2003: 34: 1445–1463.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler A.J., Wallace L.A., Rasmussen P., Kearney J., Van Ryswyk K., You H., Kulka R., Brook J.R., and Xu X. Personal exposures and indoor-outdoor concentrations of fine and ultrafine particles in multiple residences. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2010 (accepted for publication).

  • Wu C.-F., Delfino R.J., Floro J.N., Samimi B.S., Quintana P.J.E., Kleinman M.T., and Liu L.-J.S. Evaluation and quality control of personal nephelometers in indoor, outdoor and personal environments. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2005: 15: 99–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yanosky J.D., Williams P.L., and MacIntosh D.L. A comparison of two direct-reading aerosol monitors with the federal reference method for PM2.5 and indoor air. Atmos Environ 2002: 36: 107–113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zanobetti A., Stone P.H., Speizer F.E., Schwartz J.D., Coull B.A., and Suh H.H., et al. T-wave alternans, air pollution, and traffic in high-risk subjects. Am J Cardiol 2009: 104 (5): 665–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y., Yu N., Kuhn T., and Hinds W.C. Field comparison of P-Trak and condensation particle counters. Aerosol Sci Technol 2006: 40: 422–430.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 11568 Woodhollow Ct, Reston, 20191, Virginia, USA

    Lance A Wallace

  2. Air Health Science Division, Health Canada, 269 Laurier Avenue West,, Ottawa, K1A 0K9, Ontario, Canada

    Amanda J Wheeler, Jill Kearney, Keith Van Ryswyk, Hongyu You & Ryan H Kulka

  3. Exposures and Biomonitoring Division, Health Canada, 50 Colombine Driveway, Ottawa, K1A 0K9, Ontario, Canada

    Pat E Rasmussen

  4. Process Research, Environment Canada, 4905 Dufferin Street, Downsview, M3H RT4, Ontario, Canada

    Jeff R Brook

  5. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, N9B 3P4, Windsor, Ontario, Canada

    Xiaohong Xu

Authors
  1. Lance A Wallace
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amanda J Wheeler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jill Kearney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Keith Van Ryswyk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hongyu You
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ryan H Kulka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Pat E Rasmussen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jeff R Brook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xiaohong Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lance A Wallace.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallace, L., Wheeler, A., Kearney, J. et al. Validation of continuous particle monitors for personal, indoor, and outdoor exposures. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 21, 49–64 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2010.15

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2010.15

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links