Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Tools available to communities for conducting cumulative exposure and risk assessments

Abstract

This paper summarizes and assesses over 70 tools that could aid with gathering information and taking action on environmental issues related to community-based cumulative risk assessments (CBCRA). Information on tool use, development and research needs, was gathered from websites, documents, and CBCRA program participants and researchers, including 25 project officers who work directly with community groups. The tools were assessed on the basis of information provided by project officers, community members, CBCRA researchers, and by case study applications. Tables summarize key environmental issues and tool features: (1) a listing of CBCRA-related environmental issues of concern to communities; (2) web-based tools that map environmental information; (3) step-by-step guidance documents; (4) databases of environmental information; and (5) computer models that simulate human exposure to chemical stressors. All tools described here are publicly available, with the focus being on tools developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency. These tables provide sources of information to promote risk identification and prioritization beyond risk perception approaches, and could be used by CBCRA participants and researchers. The purpose of this overview is twofold: (1) To present a comprehensive, though not exhaustive, summary of numerous tools that could aid with performing CBCRAs; and (2) To use this toolset as a sample of the current state of CBCRA tools to critically examine their utility and guide research for the development of new and improved tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arquette M., Cole M., Cook K., LaFrance B., Peters M., and Ransom J., et al. Holistic risk-based environmental decision making: a native perspective. Environ Health Perspect 2002: 110 (supp 2): 259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzyk T.M., Conlon K.C., Zartarian V., Lakin M., and Schultz B. Research initiatives to reduce community-level exposures: CARE and the Communities Project. In: Abstract Book of the 17th Annual Conference of the International Society of Exposure Analysis, 14–18 October 2007, Durham/Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer R., Akter S., Brander L., and Haque E. Socioeconomic vulnerability and adaptation to environmental risk: a case study of climate change and flooding in Bangladesh. Risk Anal 2007: 27 (2): 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Community Action for a Renewed Environment (CARE). The CARE Roadmap: 10-Step Plan to Improve Community Environment and Health. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2008 Available: www.epa.gov/care/library/20080620roadmap.pdf(accessed 6 August 2008).

  • Clinton W.J. Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, Executive Order 12898: 59 FR 7629 1994.

  • Corburn J. Combining community-based research and local knowledge to confront asthma and subsistence-fishing hazards in Greenpoint/Williamsburg, Brooklyn, New York. Environ Health Perspect 2002a: 110 (supp 2): 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corburn J. Environmental justice, local knowledge, and risk: the discourse of a community-based cumulative exposure assessment. Environ Manag 2002b: 29 (4): 451–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis R., Cook D., and Cohen L. A community-resilience approach to reducing ethnic and racial disparities in health. Am J of Publ Health 2005: 95 (12): 2168–2173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deFur P.L., Evans G.W., Cohen Hubal E.A., Kyle A.D., Morello-Frosch R.A., and Williams D.R. Vulnerability as a function of individual and group resources in cumulative risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 2007: 115 (5): 817–824.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denholm E.M., and Martin II W.J. Translational research in environmental health sciences. Transl Res 2008: 151 (2): 57–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhang L., Bhatia R., Scully C.C., Corburn J., Gaydos M., and Malekafzali S. Creating tools for healthy development: case study of San Francisco's eastern neighborhoods community health impact assessment. J Publ Health Manag Pract 2008: 14 (3): 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florig H.K., Morgan M.G., Morgan K.M., Jenni K.E., Fischloff B., and Fischbeck P.S., et al. A deliberative method for ranking risks (I): overview and test bed development. Risk Anal 2001: 21 (5): 913–921.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox M.A., Groopman J.D., and Burke T.A. Evaluating cumulative risk assessment for environmental justice: a community case study. Environ Health Perspect 2002: 110 (supp 2): 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung A., and O’Rourke D. Reinventing environmental regulation from the grassroots up: explaining and expanding the success of the Toxics Release Inventory. Environ Manag 2000: 25 (2): 115–127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick R.F., McClean M.D., Meeker J.D., Baxter L.K., and Weymouth G.A. An unrecognized source of PCB contamination in schools and other buildings. Environ Health Perspect 2004: 112 (10): 1051–1053.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Higman K., Servatius C., Webber W.L., and McDonald T. Using the PACE EH model to mobilize communities to address local environmental health issues – a case study in Island County, Washington. J Environ Health 2007: 70 (1): 37–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hood E. Dwelling disparities: how poor housing leads to poor health. Environ Health Perspect 2005: 113 (5): A310–A317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard H. Working to build healthy communities: community environmental health assessments using PACE EH. J Environ Health 2006: 69 (3): 32–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keeler G.J., Dvonch J.T., Yip F.Y., Parker E.A., Israel B.A., and Marsik F.J., et al. Assessment of personal and community-level exposures to particulate matter among children with asthma in Detroit, Michigan, as part of Community Action Against Asthma (CAAA). Environ Health Perspect 2002: 110 (supp 2): 173–181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinney P.L., Aggarwal M., Northridge M.E., Janssen N.A.H., and Shepard P. Airborne concentrations of PM2.5 and diesel exhaust particles on Harlem sidewalks: a community-based pilot study. Environ Health Perspect 2000: 108 (3): 213–218.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McCurdy T., Glen G., Smith L., and Lakkadi Y. The National Exposure Research Laboratory's Consolidated Human Activity Database. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2000: 10: 566–578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Medina-Vera M., Van Emon J.M., Melnyk L., Bradham K., Harper S., and Morgan J. An overview of measurement method tools available to communities for conducting exposure and cumulative risk assessments. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2009 (in press).

  • Menzie C.A., MacDonell M.M., and Mumtaz M. A phased approach for assessing combined effects from multiple stressors. Environ Health Perspect 2007: 115 (5): 807–816.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minkler M., Vásquez V.B., Tajik M., and Petersen D. Promoting environmental justice through community-based participatory research: the role of community and partnership capacity. Health Educ Behav 2008: 35 (1): 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences (NAS). Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment. National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC, 2008.

  • National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA). Setting Priorities, Getting Results: A New Direction for EPA. Washington, DC. LCCN 95-68048, 1995.

  • National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment (NATA). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1999 Available: www.epa.gov/nata(accessed 11 September 2008).

  • National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA). Methods and Data Sources for Cumulative Health Risk Assessment of Multiple Chemicals, Exposures and Effects: A Resource Document. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-06/013F. 2007.

  • National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH). Protocol for Assessing Community Excellence in Environmental Health 2008 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available: http://pace.naccho.org/DownloadPage.asp(accessed 11 September 2008).

  • National Environmental Justice Advisory Council (NEJAC). Ensuring Risk Reduction in Communities with Multiple Stressors: Environmental Justice and Cumulative Risks/Impacts. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cumulative Risks/Impacts Workgroup, Washington, DC, 2004 Available: www.epa.gov/compliance/environmentaljustice/nejac(accessed: 6 August 2008).

  • New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services (NJDHSS). Updated Lead and Artificial Turf Fact Sheet. Trenton, NJ, 2008 Available: www.state.nj.us/health/artificialturf/index.shtml(accessed: 11 June 2008).

  • National Research Council (NRC). Pesticides in the Diet of Infants and Children. Committee on Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children, Washington, DC. National Academy Press, ISBN 0-309-04875-3 1993.

  • NRC. Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment, Committee on Risk Assessment of Hazardous Air Pollutants, Board on Environmental Sciences and Technology, Commission on Life Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, ISBN 0-309-05396-X. 1994.

  • O’Fallon L.R., and Dearry A. Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences. Environ Health Perspect 2002: 110 (supp 2): 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne-Sturges D.C., Schwab M., and Buckley T.J. Closing the research loop: a risk-based approach for communicating results of air pollution exposure studies. Environ Health Perspect 2004: 112 (1): 28–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management (PCCRARM). Risk Assessment and Risk Management in Regulatory Decision-Making. Washington, DC, 1997.

  • Perera F.P., Illman S.M., Kinney P.L., Whyatt R.M., Kelvin E.A., and Shepard P., et al. The challenge of preventing environmentally related disease in young children: community-based research in New York City. Environ Health Perspect 2002: 110 (2): 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quandt S.A., Doran A.M., Rao P., Hoppin J.A., Snively B.M., and Arcury T.A. Reporting pesticide assessment results to farmworker families: development, implementation, and evaluation of a risk communication strategy. Environ Health Perspect 2004: 112 (5): 636–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan P.B., Burke T.A., Cohen Hubal E.A., Cura J.J., and McKone T.E. Using biomarkers to inform cumulative risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 2007: 115 (5): 833–840.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schell L.M., Ravenscroft J., Cole M., Jacobs A., and Newman J. Akwesasne Task Force on the Environment. Health disparities and toxicant exposure of Akwesasne Mohawk young adults: a partnership approach to research. Environ Health Perspect 2005: 113 (12): 1826–1832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton K., and Hattis D. Assessing cumulative health risks from exposure to environmental mixtures – three fundamental questions. Environ Health Perspect 2007: 115 (5): 825–832.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Community Tool for Health and Resilience in Vulnerable Environments (THRIVE). Prevention Institute, 2004 Available: www.preventioninstitute.org/thrive.html(accessed 11 September 2008).

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems. Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Washington DC, 1987.

  • USEPA. Reducing Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies for Environmental Protection. The report of the Science Advisory Board to William K. Reilly, Administrator, 1990.

  • USEPA. Guidebook to Comparing Risks and Setting Environmental Priorities. Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Washington DC, EPA-230-B-93-003. 1993.

  • USEPA. Toward Integrated Environmental Decision-Making. Science Advisory Board, Washington, DC, EPA-SAB-EC-00-011. 2000.

  • USEPA. Framework for Cumulative Risk Assessment. Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC, EPA-630-P-02-001F. 2003 Available: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/raf/recordisplay.cfm?deid=54944(accessed 11 June 2008).

  • USEPA. Community Air Screening How-To Manual, a Step-by-Step Guide to Using Risk-Based Screening to Identify Priorities for Improving Outdoor Air Quality. Washington, DC, EPA-744-B-04-001. 2004.

  • USEPA. Community Action for a Renewed Environment Brochure. Washington, DC, EPA-400-F-06-003. 2005 Available: www.epa.gov/care/library/care_brochure_2006.pdf(accessed 11 June 2008).

  • USEPA. Memorandum of Understanding between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 2007 Available: www.epa.gov/care/library/mou2007.pdf(accessed 11 June 2008).

  • USEPA. EPA 2008 Report on the Environment (Final Report). Washington D.C., EPA/600/R-07/045F. 2008a.

  • USEPA. The Community CARE Resource Guide. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 2008b Available: www.epa.gov/osp/care/library/CARE_Resource_Guide.pdf(accessed 11 June 2008).

  • Zartarian V., and Schultz B. The EPA's human exposure research program for assessing cumulative risk in communities. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2009 (in press).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the CARE administrators, project officers, and community members, whose input and perspective were an integral part of formulating this research. We also thank all the members of the CCRP team who contributed their feedback during the development of this review. Matt Lakin in Region 9 contributed significant technical direction and information on community needs. Myriam Medina-Vera of ORD NERL provided valuable feedback on myriad issues throughout this process. We would like to thank Stephen Graham and Eric Hall for their contributions to the initial stages of the project. Details about the exposure models were provided by EPA personnel, Conrad Flessner, Christina Cinalli, Jay Jon, Nhan Nyugen, and Lisa Melnyk.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy M Barzyk.

Additional information

Disclaimer

The US EPA through its Office of Research and Development funded and conducted the research described here. It has been subjected to Agency review and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barzyk, T., Conlon, K., Chahine, T. et al. Tools available to communities for conducting cumulative exposure and risk assessments. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 20, 371–384 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2009.25

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2009.25

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links