Research Article

Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology (2005) 15, 500–508. doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500428; published online 20 April 2005

Urinary and hand wipe pesticide levels among farmers and nonfarmers in Iowa

Brian D Curwina, Misty J Heina, Wayne T Sandersonb, Dana B Barrc, Dick Heederikd, Stephen J Reynoldse, Elizabeth M Wardf and Michael C Alavanjag

  1. aDivision of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
  2. bDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
  3. cCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  4. dInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
  5. eDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colarado, USA
  6. fDepartment of Epidemiology and Surveillance Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  7. gNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Correspondence: Brian Curwin, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS R-14, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA. Tel: +1 513 841 4432; Fax: +1 513 841 4486; E-mail: bcurwin@cdc.gov

Received 7 October 2004; Accepted 8 March 2005; Published online 20 April 2005.

Top

Abstract

In the spring and summer of 2001, as part of a larger study investigating farm family pesticide exposure and home contamination in Iowa, urine and hand wipe samples were collected from 24 male farmers and 23 male nonfarmer controls. On two occasions approximately 1 month apart, one hand wipe sample and an evening and morning urine sample were collected from each participant. The samples were analyzed for the parent compound or metabolites of six commonly used agricultural pesticides: alachlor, atrazine, acetochlor, metolachlor, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and chlorpyrifos. For atrazine, acetochlor, metolachlor and 2,4-D, farmers who reported applying the pesticide had significantly higher urinary metabolite levels than nonfarmers, farmers who did not apply the pesticide, and farmers who had the pesticide commercially applied (P-value <0.05). Generally, there were no differences in urinary pesticide metabolite levels between nonfarmers, farmers who did not apply the pesticide, and farmers who had the pesticide commercially applied. Among farmers who reported applying 2,4-D themselves, time since application, amount of pesticide applied, and the number of acres to which the pesticide was applied were marginally associated with 2,4-D urine levels. Among farmers who reported applying atrazine themselves, time since application and farm size were marginally associated with atrazine mercapturate urine levels. Farmers who reported using a closed cab to apply these pesticides had higher urinary pesticide metabolite levels, although the difference was not statistically significant. Farmers who reported using closed cabs tended to use more pesticides. The majority of the hand wipe samples were nondetectable. However, detection of atrazine in the hand wipes was significantly associated with urinary levels of atrazine above the median (P-value <0.01).

Keywords:

pesticides, exposure, biomonitoring, urine, hand wipe, herbicides, insecticides, farmer.

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated

Extra navigation

.
ADVERTISEMENT