Abstract
Objective:
The objective of the study is to validate self-reported cellular phone use information by comparing it with the cumulative emitted power and duration of calls measured by software-modified cellular phones (SMP). The information was obtained using a questionnaire developed for the international case–control study on the risk of the use of mobile phones in tumours of the brain or salivary gland (INTERPHONE-study). Method: The study was conducted in Bielefeld, Germany. Volunteers were asked to use SMPs instead of their own cellular phones for a period of 1 month. The SMP recorded the power emitted by the mobile phone handset during each base station contact. Information on cellular phone use for the same time period from traffic records of the network providers and from face-to-face interviews with the participants 3 months after the SMP use was assessed. Pearson's correlation coefficients and linear regression models were used to analyse the association between information from the interview and from the SMP. Results: In total, 1757 personal mobile phone calls were recorded for 45 persons by SMP and traffic records. The correlation between the self-reported information about the number and the duration of calls with the cumulative power of calls was 0.50 (P<0.01) and 0.48 (P<0.01), respectively. Almost 23% of the variance of the cumulative power was explained by either the number or the cumulative duration of calls. After inclusion of possible confounding factors in the regression model, the variance increased to 26%. Minor confounding factors were “network provider”, “contract form”, and “cellular phone model”. Discussion: The number of calls alone is a sufficient parameter to estimate the cumulative power emitted by the handset of a cellular telephone. The cumulative power emitted by these phones is only associated with number of calls but not with possible confounding factors. Using the mobile phone while driving, mainly in cities, or mainly in rural areas is not associated with the recorded cumulative power in the SMP.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 6 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $43.17 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernhardt J.H. Gesundheitliche Aspekte des Mobilfunks. Dtsch Ärzteblatt 1999: 96: C592–C597.
Boice J.D., and McLaughlin J.K. Epidemiologic studies of cellular telephones and cancer risk — a review. SSI Rapport 2002: 16.
Cardis E., and Kilkenny M. International case-control study of adult brain, head and neck tumours: results of the feasibility study. Radiat Prot Dosim 1999: 83: 179–183.
Feinstein A.R., and Cicchetti D.V. High agreement but low Kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epdemiol 1990: 46: 543–549.
Funch D.P., Rothman K.J., Loughlin J.E., and Dreyer N.A. Utility of telephone company records for epidemiologic studies of cellular telephones [see comments]. Epidemiology 1996: 7: 299–302.
Muscat J.E., Malkin M.G., and Shore R.E., et al. Handheld cellular telephones and risk of acoustic neuroma. Neurology 2002: 58: 1304–1306.
Parslow R.C., Hepworth S.J., and McKinney P.A. Recall of past use of mobile phone handsets. Radiat Prot Dosim 2003: 106: 233–240.
Samkange-Zeeb F., Berg G., and Blettner M. Validation of self-reported cellular phone use. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 2004: 14: 245–248.
Stewart W., and the independent Expert group on mobile phones National Radiological Protection board. Mobile phones and health. Chilton Didcot Oxon 2000, pp. 33–38.
Wiart J., Dale C., Bosisio A.V., and Cornec A.L. Analysis of the influence of the power control and discontinuous transmission on RF exposure with GSM mobile phones. IEEE Transact. Electromagn Comp 2000: 42 (43): 374–385.
Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press: New York, 1998, pp. 101–147.
Acknowledgements
We thank the two network operators, Vodafone and T mobile for the technical assistance during data acquisition. We also thank the international Interphone team at the IARC for the support in data processing and for the continual advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berg, G., Schüz, J., Samkange-Zeeb, F. et al. Assessment of radiofrequency exposure from cellular telephone daily use in an epidemiological study: German Validation study of the international case–control study of cancers of the brain—INTERPHONE-Study. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 15, 217–224 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500390
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500390
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Mapping of radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure levels in outdoor environment and comparing with reference levels for general public health
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2018)
-
Long-term recall accuracy for mobile phone calls in young Japanese people: A follow-up validation study using software-modified phones
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2018)
-
Recall accuracy of mobile phone calls among Japanese young people
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2016)
-
Instruments to assess and measure personal and environmental radiofrequency-electromagnetic field exposures
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine (2016)
-
Validation of self-reported start year of mobile phone use in a Swedish case–control study on radiofrequency fields and acoustic neuroma risk
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2015)