Review Article
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2000) 20, 423–451; doi:10.1097/00004647-200003000-00001
Imaging Synaptic Neurotransmission With in Vivo Binding Competition Techniques: A Critical Review
Supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (K02 MH01603-01).
Marc Laruelle
*Department of Psychiatry and Radiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Correspondence: Marc Laruelle MD, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 42, New York, NY, 10032, U.S.A.
Received 25 August 1999; Revised 3 December 1999; Accepted 3 December 1999.
Abstract
Several groups have provided evidence that positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) neuroreceptor imaging techniques might be applied to measure acute fluctuations in dopamine (DA) synaptic concentration in the living human brain. Competition between DA and radioligands for binding to D2 receptor is the principle underlying this approach. This new application of neuroreceptor imaging provides a dynamic measurement of neurotransmission that is likely to be informative to our understanding of neuropsychiatric conditions. This article reviews and discusses the body of data supporting the feasibility and potential of this imaging paradigm. Endogenous competition studies performed in rodents, nonhuman primates, and humans are first summarized. After this overview, the validity of the model underlying the interpretation of these imaging data is critically assessed. The current reference model is defined as the occupancy model, since changes in radiotracer binding potential (BP) are assumed to be directly caused by changes in occupancy of D2 receptors by DA. Experimental data supporting this model are presented. The evidence that manipulation of DA synaptic levels induces change in the BP of several D2 radiotracers (catecholamines and benzamides) is unequivocal. The fact that these changes in BP are mediated by changes in DA synaptic concentration is well documented. The relationship between the magnitude of BP changes measured with PET or SPECT and the magnitude of changes in DA concentration measured by microdialysis supports the use of these noninvasive techniques to measure changes in neurotransmission. On the other hand, several observations remain unexplained. First, the amphetamine-induced changes in the BP of D2 receptor antagonists [123I]IBZM and [11C]raclopride last longer than amphetamine-induced changes in DA extracellular concentration. Second, nonbenzamide D2 receptor antagonists, such as spiperone and pimozide, are not affected by changes in DA release, or are affected in a direction opposite to that predicted by the occupancy model. Similar observations are reported with D1 radiotracers. These results suggest that the changes in BP following changes in DA concentration might not be fully accounted by a simple occupancy model. Specifically, the data are reviewed supporting that agonist-mediated receptor internalization might play an important role in characterizing receptor-ligand interactions. Finally, it is proposed that a better understanding of the mechanism underlying the effects observed with benzamides is essential to develop this imaging technique to other receptor systems.
Keywords:
Positron emission tomography, Single-photon emission computed tomography, Dopamine, Raclopride, IBZM, Spiperone, Internalization
Abbreviations:
AMPT, alpha-methyl-para-tyrosine; AO, acridine orange; APO, apomorphine or 5,6,6a,7-tetrahydro-6-methyl-4H-dibenzo[de,g]quinoline-10,11-diol; BBB, blood-brain barrier; Bmax, maximum number of binding sites; BP, binding potential; DA, dopamine; DAT, dopamine transporter; epidepride, (S)-(-)-2,3-dimethoxy-N-[(1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-5-iodobenzamide; fallypride, (S)-(-)-N-[(1-allyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-2,3-dimethoxy-5-fluoropropylbenzamide; fluoroclebopride, 4-amino-5-chloro-N-[1-(4'-fluorophenylmethyl)-4-piperidinyl]-2-methoxybenzamide; 5HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine; IBF, (S)-N-[(1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-2,3-dihydro-5-iodo-7-benzofurancarboxamide; IBZM, (S)-(-)-N-[(1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-2-hydroxy-3-iodo-6-methoxy-benzamide; Kd, dissociation rate constant; NMSP, 8-[4-(4-fluorophenyl)-4-oxobutyl]-3-methyl-1-phenyl-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5] decan-4-one; NNC 112, (+)-5-(7-benzofuranyl)-8-chloro-7-hydroxy-3-methyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; NNC 756, (+)-8-chloro-5-(2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-7-yl)-7-hydroxy-3-methyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine; NPA, propylnorapomorphine or 5,6,6a,7-tetrahydro-6-propyl-4H-dibenzo[de.g]quinoline-10,11-diol; PET, positron emission tomography; pimozide, 1-[1-[4,4-bis(4-fluorophenyl)butyl]-4-piperidinyl]-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one; raclopride, (S)-(-)-3,5-dichloro-N-[(1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-2-hydroxy-6-methoxybenzamide; rCBF, regional CBF; SCH 23390, (+)-8-chloro-7-hydroxy-3-methyl-5-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine; SKF 82957, (
)-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine; SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography; spiperone, 8-[4-(4-fluorophenyl)-4-oxobutyl]-1-phenyl-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decan-4-one; sulpride, 5-(aminosulfonyl)-N-[(1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-2-methoxybenzamide

