Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works NATURE.COM NATURE NEWS NATUREJOBS NATUREEVENTS ABOUT NPG
Help Nature.com site index  
Gene Therapy
SEARCH     advanced search my account e-alerts subscribe register
Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
For authors
For referees
Contact editorial office
About the journal
For librarians
Subscribe
Advertising
naturereprints
Contact NPG
Customer services
Site features
NPG Subject areas
Access material from all our publications in your subject area:
Biotechnology Biotechnology
Cancer Cancer
Chemistry Chemistry
Dentistry Dentistry
Development Development
Drug Discovery Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology Evolution & Ecology
Genetics Genetics
Immunology Immunology
Materials Materials Science
Medical Research Medical Research
Microbiology Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience Neuroscience
Pharmacology Pharmacology
Physics Physics
Browse all publications
 
June 2002, Volume 9, Number 11, Pages 700-702
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Full text  PDF
Optimising gene repair strategies in cell culture
P Thorpe, B J Stevenson and D J Porteous

Medical Genetics Section, Molecular Medicine Centre, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK

Correspondence to: P Thorpe, University of Edinburgh, Medical Genetics Section, Molecular Medicine Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK; E-mail: peter.thorpe@ed.ac.uk

Abstract

Gene repair, the precise modification of the genome, offers a number of advantages over replacement gene therapy. In practice, gene targeting strategies are limited by the inefficiency of homologous recombination in mammalian cells. A number of strategies, including RNA-DNA oligonucleotides (RDOs) and short DNA fragments (SDFs), show promise in improving the efficiency of gene correction. We are using GFP as a reporter for gene repair in living cells. A single base substitution was introduced into GFP to create a nonsense mutation (STOP codon, W399X). RDOs and SDFs are used to repair this mutation episomally in transient transfections and restore green fluorescence. The correction efficiency is determined by FACS analysis. SDFs appear to correct GFP W399X in a number of different cell lines (COS7, A549, HT1080, HuH-7), although all at a similar low frequency (~0.6% of transfected cells). RDOs correct only one of our cell lines significantly (HT1080-RAD51), these cells overexpress the human RAD51 gene; the bacterial RecA homologue. The GFP W399X reporter is a fusion gene with hygromycin (at the 5' end), this has allowed us to make stable cell lines (A549, HT1080) to study genomic correction. Initial studies using our correction molecules show only low efficiencies of genomic repair (∽10-4). Polyethylenimine (PEI) is used to deliver RDOs and SDFs into mammalian cells in culture for our study. We have used fluorescently labelled RDOs and SDFs to study the effectiveness of this process. FACS analysis of transfected nuclei implied efficient delivery (>90%) both with SDFs and RDOs. However, confocal fluorescence microscopy suggests that a large proportion of the complexed RDO/SDF appears to remain outside the nucleus (or attached to the nuclear membrane). On the basis of these data we are assessing new delivery methods and factors that may alter recombination status to optimise gene repair.

Gene Therapy 2002 9, 700-702. DOI: 10.1038/sj/gt/3301750

Keywords

CFTR; SFHR; gene repair; chimeraplast

June 2002, Volume 9, Number 11, Pages 700-702
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Full text  PDF
Privacy Policy © 2002 Nature Publishing Group