Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Behavior and Psychology

How obesity relates to socio-economic status: identification of eating behavior mediators

Abstract

Background:

Socio-economic status (SES) is a strong determinant of eating behavior and the obesity risk.

Objective:

To determine which eating and lifestyle behaviors mediate the association between SES and obesity.

Methods:

We performed a case–control study of 318 obese people and 371 non-obese people in northern France. Ten eating behavior traits were assessed using the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire Revised 21-Item and an eating attitude questionnaire (on plate size, the number of servings, reasons for stopping eating and the frequency of eating standing up, eating in front of the television set (TV) and eating at night). The SES score (in three categories) was based on occupation, education and income categories. Mediation analysis was performed using the test of joint significance and the difference of coefficients test.

Results:

The age- and gender-adjusted obesity risk was higher for individuals in the low-SES groups (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.82 (1.48–2.24), P<0.0001). Additional servings were associated with a higher obesity risk (OR=3.43, P<0.0001). Cognitive restraint (P<0.0001) and emotional eating (P<0.0001) scores were higher in obese participants than in non-obese participants but did not depend on SES. Of the 10 potential factors tested, eating off a large plate (P=0.01), eating at night (P=0.04) and uncontrolled eating (P=0.03) significantly mediated the relationship between SES and obesity.

Conclusion:

Our results highlighted a number of obesogenic behaviors among socially disadvantaged participants: large plate size, uncontrolled eating and eating at night were significant mediators of the relationship between SES and the obesity risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization Report of a WHO Consultation. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. WHO technical report series 894. World Health Organiztion: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.

  2. Sobal J, Stunkard AJ . Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychol Bull 1989; 105: 260–275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McLaren L, Kuh D . Women's body dissatisfaction, social class, and social mobility. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 1575–1584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Drewnowski A . Obesity, diets, and social inequalities. Nutr Rev 2009; 67: S36–S39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stamatakis E, Coombs N, Rowlands A, Shelton N, Hillsdon M . Objectively-assessed and self-reported sedentary time in relation to multiple socioeconomic status indicators among adults in England: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e006034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thorp AA, Owen N, Neuhaus M, Dunstan DW . Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996-2011. Am J Prev Med 2011; 41: 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pigeyre M, Duhamel A, Poulain JP, Rousseaux J, Barbe P, Jeanneau S et al. Influence of social factors on weight-related behaviors according to gender in the French adult population. Appetite 2012; 58: 703–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blundell JE, Lawton CL, Hill AJ . Mechanisms of appetite control and their abnormalities in obese patients. Horm Res 1993; 39: 72–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ello-Martin JA, Ledikwe JH, Rolls BJ . The influence of food portion size and energy density on energy intake: implications for weight management. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 82: 236S–241S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hays NP, Bathalon GP, McCrory MA, Roubenoff R, Lipman R, Roberts SB . Eating behavior correlates of adult weight gain and obesity in healthy women aged 55-65 y. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 75: 476–483.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson F, Pratt M, Wardle J . Dietary restraint and self-regulation in eating behavior. Int J Obes 2012; 36: 665–674.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lowe MR, Doshi SD, Katterman SN, Feig EH . Dieting and restrained eating as prospective predictors of weight gain. Front Psychol 2013; 4: 577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dykes J, Brunner EJ, Martikainen PT, Wardle J . Socioeconomic gradient in body size and obesity among women: the role of dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger in the Whitehall II study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004; 28: 262–268.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ward H, Tarasuk V, Mendelson R, McKeown-Eyssen G . An exploration of socioeconomic variation in lifestyle factors and adiposity in the Ontario Food Survey through structural equation modeling. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2007; 4: 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Duclos M, Dejager S, Postel-Vinay N, di Nicola S, Quere S, Fiquet B . Physical activity in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension—insights into motivations and barriers from the MOBILE study. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2015; 11: 361–371.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Tholin S, Rasmussen F, Tynelius P, Karlsson J . Genetic and environmental influences on eating behavior: the Swedish Young Male Twins Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 81: 564–569.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Garrow JS . Quetelet index as indicator of obesity. Lancet 1986; 1: 1219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V . A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods 2002; 7: 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fritz MS, Mackinnon DP . Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychol Sci 2007; 18: 233–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rolls BJ . What is the role of portion control in weight management? Int J Obes 2014; 38: S1–S8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Halverson KH, Meengs JS . Using a smaller plate did not reduce energy intake at meals. Appetite 2007; 49: 652–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Robinson E, Nolan S, Tudur-Smith C, Boyland EJ, Harrold JA, Hardman CA et al. Will smaller plates lead to smaller waists? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect that experimental manipulation of dishware size has on energy consumption. Obes Rev 2014; 15: 812–821.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Gerber RA, Leidy NK, Sexton CC, Lowe MR et al. Psychometric analysis of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R21: results from a large diverse sample of obese and non-obese participants. Int J Obes 2009; 33: 611–620.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Provencher V, Drapeau V, Tremblay A, Despres JP, Lemieux S . Eating behaviors and indexes of body composition in men and women from the Quebec family study. Obes Res 2003; 11: 783–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. de Lauzon-Guillain B, Basdevant A, Romon M, Karlsson J, Borys JM, Charles MA . Is restrained eating a risk factor for weight gain in a general population? Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 83: 132–138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Boerner LM, Spillane NS, Anderson KG, Smith GT . Similarities and differences between women and men on eating disorder risk factors and symptom measures. Eat Behav 2004; 5: 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stevenson RJ, Mahmut M, Rooney K . Individual differences in the interoceptive states of hunger, fullness and thirst. Appetite 2015; 95: 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schachter S . Obesity and eating. Internal and external cues differentially affect the eating behavior of obese and normal subjects. Science 1968; 161: 751–756.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stunkard AJ, Fox S . The relationship of gastric motility and hunger. A summary of the evidence. Psychosom Med 1971; 33: 123–134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. De Castro JM, King GA, Duarte-Gardea M, Gonzalez-Ayala S, Kooshian CH . Overweight and obese humans overeat away from home. Appetite 2012; 59: 204–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hetherington MM . Sensory-specific satiety and its importance in meal termination. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1996; 20: 113–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cornier MA, McFadden KL, Thomas EA, Bechtell JL, Eichman LS, Bessesen DH et al. Differences in the neuronal response to food in obesity-resistant as compared to obesity-prone individuals. Physiol Behav 2013; 110: 122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jeffery RW, French SA . Socioeconomic status and weight control practices among 20- to 45-year-old women. Am J Public Health 1996; 86: 1005–1010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The staff of the Centre de Prévention et d'Education pour la Santé is acknowledged for its help in the recruitment of non-obese individuals. This research was funded by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (grant to AM), Institut Pasteur de Lille, INSERM, Lille University, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Lille, Nord-Pas de Calais Regional Council and FEDER.

Author contributions

MP conducted the research, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; JR conducted the research; PT analyzed the data; M-PD helped to recruit participants; AC helped to recruit participants and conducted the research; MR designed and conducted the research, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; JDa conducted the research and analyzed the data; AD analyzed the data; LG analyzed the data; PA conducted the research; JDu analyzed the data; AM designed and conducted the research, analyzed the data, wrote the manuscript and had primary responsibility for final content.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Meirhaeghe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on International Journal of Obesity website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pigeyre, M., Rousseaux, J., Trouiller, P. et al. How obesity relates to socio-economic status: identification of eating behavior mediators. Int J Obes 40, 1794–1801 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.109

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.109

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links