Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Obesity Paradox should not interfere with public health efforts

Abstract

The Obesity Paradox could result in confusing messages that derail beneficial environmental changes and lead to reduced efforts by physicians to provide healthy lifestyle treatment plans to their obese patients. The Obesity Paradox applies in the main to individuals who have a disease, and therefore observed associations with mortality illustrating the Paradox may be more susceptible to certain types of bias than would be found in healthy individuals. Although individualization of weight loss advice for patients with serious disease is appropriate in medical settings, this does not supplant the need for general efforts to prevent and treat obesity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Dixon JB, Egger GJ, Finkelstein EA, Kral JG, Lambert GW . ‘Obesity Paradox’ misunderstands the biology of optimal weight throughout the life cycle. Int J Obes (Lond) 2014; e-pub ahead of print 15 April 2014; doi:10.1038/ijo.2014.59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, Ard JD, Comuzzie AG, Donato KA et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. Circulation 2013; e-pub ahead of print 12 November 2013.

  3. Flanders WD, Augestad LB . Adjusting for reverse causality in the relationship between obesity and mortality. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008; 32: S42–S46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hernan MA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Robins JM . A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology 2004; 15: 615–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arthur AE, Peterson KE, Rozek LS, Taylor JM, Light E, Chepeha DB et al. Pretreatment dietary patterns, weight status, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma prognosis. Am J Clin Nutr 2013; 97 360–368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Curtis JP, Selter JG, Wang Y, Rathore SS, Jovin IS, Jadbabaie F et al. The obesity paradox: body mass index and outcomes in patients with heart failure. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Park SM, Lim MK, Shin SA, Yun YH . Impact of prediagnosis smoking, alcohol, obesity, and insulin resistance on survival in male cancer patients: National Health Insurance Corporation Study. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 5017–5024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Uretsky S, Messerli FH, Bangalore S, Champion A, Cooper-Dehoff RM, Zhou Q et al. Obesity paradox in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease. Am J Med 2007; 120: 863–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Abbott KC, Salahudeen AK, Kilpatrick RD, Horwich TB . Survival advantages of obesity in dialysis patients. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 81: 543–554.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lawlor DA, Hart CL, Hole DJ, Davey Smith G . Reverse causality and confounding and the associations of overweight and obesity with mortality. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006; 14: 2294–2304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lajous M, Bijon A, Fagherazzi G, Boutron-Ruault MC, Balkau B, Clavel-Chapelon F et al. Body mass index, diabetes, and mortality in French women: explaining away a ‘paradox’. Epidemiology 2014; 25: 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults−The Evidence Report. National Institutes of Health. Obes Res 1998; 6: 51S–209S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma AM, Kushner RF . A proposed clinical staging system for obesity. Int J Obes (Lond) 2009; 33: 289–295.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bradshaw PT, Monda KL, Stevens J . Metabolic syndrome in healthy obese, overweight, and normal weight individuals: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013; 21: 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Douketis JD, Macie C, Thabane L, Williamson DF . Systematic review of long-term weight loss studies in obese adults: clinical significance and applicability to clinical practice. Int J Obes (Lond) 2005; 29: 1153–1167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pi-Sunyer X, Blackburn G, Brancati FL, Bray GA, Bright R, Clark JM et al. Reduction in weight and cardiovascular disease risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes: one-year results of the look AHEAD trial. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 1374–1383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 393–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Naimark A, Walker AM, Meenan RF . Obesity and knee osteoarthritis. The Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med 1988; 109: 18–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, Amarsi Z, Birmingham CL, Anis AH . The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2009; 9: 88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective. American Institute for Cancer Research: Washington, DC, 2007.

  21. Schwartz AR, Patil SP, Laffan AM, Polotsky V, Schneider H, Smith PL . Obesity and obstructive sleep apnea: pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008; 5: 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Coggon D, Reading I, Croft P, McLaren M, Barrett D, Cooper C . Knee osteoarthritis and obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25: 622–627.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Stevens.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stevens, J., Bradshaw, P., Truesdale, K. et al. Obesity Paradox should not interfere with public health efforts. Int J Obes 39, 80–81 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2014.60

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2014.60

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links